If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
What comes after Dropbox?
On Mon, 27 Mar 2017 19:42:17 -0700, Bill W
wrote: On Mon, 27 Mar 2017 19:20:49 -0700, Savageduck wrote: On 2017-03-28 01:57:34 +0000, Bill W said: On Mon, 27 Mar 2017 18:32:24 -0700, Savageduck wrote: On 2017-03-28 00:44:16 +0000, Bill W said: On Tue, 28 Mar 2017 11:49:48 +1300, Eric Stevens wrote: I've been using Dropbox quite satisfactorily, for several years, to provide links to photographs I want to post to the Internet. Now they have changed the way they work and I am not atll satisfied with either the way they work or what they seem to do to images. I have one image which I have been trying to post in response to an article by Savageduck in which we were discussing a collection of landscape photographs. All I can manage with Dropbox is coarse fine-detail and obvious color banding in the sky. I know there are various ways in which I can replace Dropbox but it will take me a long time to explore them all. I would be grateful for any suggestions as to the best way I can go about replacing Dropbox. Flickr is really all I've tried, but it seems good to me. I like that a mouse click or two in LR gets the photos onto the site, processed and sized exactly the way I want, and it will put them into the correct, or new, album. The paid version is cheap enough that I can't even remember the cost. There is also Smugmug. They're not in the LR list of publish services, so I would have to put some actual effort into getting the photos to that site. I am lazy. And with Flickr, after I upload, it's also a no-brainer to copy the link to that album so I can share. No-brainers are a very good fit for me... Actually Smugmug is right there, ready to be used. All you have to do is go to the bottom of the "Publishing Services" panel and click on "Find More Services Online". There you will find all sorts of services for fee and free. On page #3 you will find the free "Official Smugmug Publish Plugin". Install it and restart LR and it is as easy to use as the Flickr publish plugin. Another no-brainer. https://www.dropbox.com/s/wcnubdqh1n46kix/screenshot_27.png I see. I looked there once before, but this time I selected LR, and then I typed "publish" into the search box, and that narrowed things down enough to actually find things. OK. That's all very well, but why should I choose one over the other (or not)? -- Regards, Eric Stevens |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
What comes after Dropbox?
On Tue, 28 Mar 2017 19:51:21 +1300, Eric Stevens
wrote: On Mon, 27 Mar 2017 19:42:17 -0700, Bill W wrote: On Mon, 27 Mar 2017 19:20:49 -0700, Savageduck wrote: On 2017-03-28 01:57:34 +0000, Bill W said: On Mon, 27 Mar 2017 18:32:24 -0700, Savageduck wrote: On 2017-03-28 00:44:16 +0000, Bill W said: On Tue, 28 Mar 2017 11:49:48 +1300, Eric Stevens wrote: I've been using Dropbox quite satisfactorily, for several years, to provide links to photographs I want to post to the Internet. Now they have changed the way they work and I am not atll satisfied with either the way they work or what they seem to do to images. I have one image which I have been trying to post in response to an article by Savageduck in which we were discussing a collection of landscape photographs. All I can manage with Dropbox is coarse fine-detail and obvious color banding in the sky. I know there are various ways in which I can replace Dropbox but it will take me a long time to explore them all. I would be grateful for any suggestions as to the best way I can go about replacing Dropbox. Flickr is really all I've tried, but it seems good to me. I like that a mouse click or two in LR gets the photos onto the site, processed and sized exactly the way I want, and it will put them into the correct, or new, album. The paid version is cheap enough that I can't even remember the cost. There is also Smugmug. They're not in the LR list of publish services, so I would have to put some actual effort into getting the photos to that site. I am lazy. And with Flickr, after I upload, it's also a no-brainer to copy the link to that album so I can share. No-brainers are a very good fit for me... Actually Smugmug is right there, ready to be used. All you have to do is go to the bottom of the "Publishing Services" panel and click on "Find More Services Online". There you will find all sorts of services for fee and free. On page #3 you will find the free "Official Smugmug Publish Plugin". Install it and restart LR and it is as easy to use as the Flickr publish plugin. Another no-brainer. https://www.dropbox.com/s/wcnubdqh1n46kix/screenshot_27.png I see. I looked there once before, but this time I selected LR, and then I typed "publish" into the search box, and that narrowed things down enough to actually find things. OK. That's all very well, but why should I choose one over the other (or not)? I know nothing at all about Smugmug. Maybe Duck is familiar with both. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
What comes after Dropbox?
On 28/03/2017 02:43, philo wrote:
On 03/27/2017 05:49 PM, Eric Stevens wrote: I've been using Dropbox quite satisfactorily, for several years, to provide links to photographs I want to post to the Internet. Now they have changed the way they work and I am not atll satisfied with either the way they work or what they seem to do to images. I have one image which I have been trying to post in response to an article by Savageduck in which we were discussing a collection of landscape photographs. All I can manage with Dropbox is coarse fine-detail and obvious color banding in the sky. I know there are various ways in which I can replace Dropbox but it will take me a long time to explore them all. I would be grateful for any suggestions as to the best way I can go about replacing Dropbox. Dropbox works fine for me but some folks say it takes a while for the images to load This is one of my favorite images I've saved there! https://www.dropbox.com/s/b55p0t1fio...amock.jpg?dl=0 It looks good on MY machine. What do others think of the quality? -- "Do something wonderful, people may imitate it." (Albert Schweitzer) |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
What comes after Dropbox?
In article ,
"David B." wrote: On 28/03/2017 02:43, philo wrote: On 03/27/2017 05:49 PM, Eric Stevens wrote: I've been using Dropbox quite satisfactorily, for several years, to provide links to photographs I want to post to the Internet. Now they have changed the way they work and I am not atll satisfied with either the way they work or what they seem to do to images. I have one image which I have been trying to post in response to an article by Savageduck in which we were discussing a collection of landscape photographs. All I can manage with Dropbox is coarse fine-detail and obvious color banding in the sky. I know there are various ways in which I can replace Dropbox but it will take me a long time to explore them all. I would be grateful for any suggestions as to the best way I can go about replacing Dropbox. Dropbox works fine for me but some folks say it takes a while for the images to load This is one of my favorite images I've saved there! https://www.dropbox.com/s/b55p0t1fio...amock.jpg?dl=0 It looks good on MY machine. What do others think of the quality? As expected. Marley looks fine and, well the colors of the hammock is your choice... How would DB change the pictures appearance without parsing and altering the file? -- teleportation kills |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
What comes after Dropbox?
On 2017-03-27 18:49, Eric Stevens wrote:
I've been using Dropbox quite satisfactorily, for several years, to provide links to photographs I want to post to the Internet. Now they have changed the way they work and I am not atll satisfied with either the way they work or what they seem to do to images. I have one image which I have been trying to post in response to an article by Savageduck in which we were discussing a collection of landscape photographs. All I can manage with Dropbox is coarse fine-detail and obvious color banding in the sky. I know there are various ways in which I can replace Dropbox but it will take me a long time to explore them all. I would be grateful for any suggestions as to the best way I can go about replacing Dropbox. I use Dropbox for business and it's perfect for that. It was never meant to be a photo sharing site. It is, at heart, a file sharing site. I uploaded some short videos to it and if you play them back from their site the result is horrible. So I have to tell people to DL the file from Dropbox and then play it. But such represents 1% of my Dropbox use. -- "If war is God's way of teaching Americans geography, then recession is His way of teaching everyone a little economics." ..Raj Patel, The Value of Nothing. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
What comes after Dropbox?
On 28/03/2017 13:57, android wrote:
In article , "David B." wrote: On 28/03/2017 02:43, philo wrote: On 03/27/2017 05:49 PM, Eric Stevens wrote: I've been using Dropbox quite satisfactorily, for several years, to provide links to photographs I want to post to the Internet. Now they have changed the way they work and I am not atll satisfied with either the way they work or what they seem to do to images. I have one image which I have been trying to post in response to an article by Savageduck in which we were discussing a collection of landscape photographs. All I can manage with Dropbox is coarse fine-detail and obvious color banding in the sky. I know there are various ways in which I can replace Dropbox but it will take me a long time to explore them all. I would be grateful for any suggestions as to the best way I can go about replacing Dropbox. Dropbox works fine for me but some folks say it takes a while for the images to load This is one of my favorite images I've saved there! https://www.dropbox.com/s/b55p0t1fio...amock.jpg?dl=0 It looks good on MY machine. What do others think of the quality? As expected. Marley looks fine and, well the colors of the hammock is your choice... That's good to learn ..... yet Marley is my son's dog, as is the hammock! I suspect the latter was bought in the USA when my son was serving there! How would DB change the pictures appearance without parsing and altering the file? I might have a play with GIMP https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GIMP Is there a better way? -- "Do something wonderful, people may imitate it." (Albert Schweitzer) |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
What comes after Dropbox?
On 2017-03-28 13:37:40 +0000, "David B." said:
On 28/03/2017 13:57, android wrote: In article , "David B." wrote: On 28/03/2017 02:43, philo wrote: On 03/27/2017 05:49 PM, Eric Stevens wrote: I've been using Dropbox quite satisfactorily, for several years, to provide links to photographs I want to post to the Internet. Now they have changed the way they work and I am not atll satisfied with either the way they work or what they seem to do to images. I have one image which I have been trying to post in response to an article by Savageduck in which we were discussing a collection of landscape photographs. All I can manage with Dropbox is coarse fine-detail and obvious color banding in the sky. I know there are various ways in which I can replace Dropbox but it will take me a long time to explore them all. I would be grateful for any suggestions as to the best way I can go about replacing Dropbox. Dropbox works fine for me but some folks say it takes a while for the images to load This is one of my favorite images I've saved there! https://www.dropbox.com/s/b55p0t1fio...amock.jpg?dl=0 It looks good on MY machine. What do others think of the quality? As expected. Marley looks fine and, well the colors of the hammock is your choice... That's good to learn ..... yet Marley is my son's dog, as is the hammock! I suspect the latter was bought in the USA when my son was serving there! How would DB change the pictures appearance without parsing and altering the file? I might have a play with GIMP https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GIMP Is there a better way? It looks as though you are using a Mac, so my suggestion is to take a look at either Luminar or Affinity Photo. Either one is less of a headache than GIMP and both work very well on a Mac without going to the Adobe subscription model. There is also Pixelmator to consider. https://macphun.com/luminar https://affinity.serif.com/en-us/photo/ http://www.pixelmator.com -- Regards, Savageduck |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
What comes after Dropbox?
In article ,
"David B." wrote: On 28/03/2017 13:57, android wrote: In article , "David B." wrote: On 28/03/2017 02:43, philo wrote: On 03/27/2017 05:49 PM, Eric Stevens wrote: I've been using Dropbox quite satisfactorily, for several years, to provide links to photographs I want to post to the Internet. Now they have changed the way they work and I am not atll satisfied with either the way they work or what they seem to do to images. I have one image which I have been trying to post in response to an article by Savageduck in which we were discussing a collection of landscape photographs. All I can manage with Dropbox is coarse fine-detail and obvious color banding in the sky. I know there are various ways in which I can replace Dropbox but it will take me a long time to explore them all. I would be grateful for any suggestions as to the best way I can go about replacing Dropbox. Dropbox works fine for me but some folks say it takes a while for the images to load This is one of my favorite images I've saved there! https://www.dropbox.com/s/b55p0t1fio...amock.jpg?dl=0 It looks good on MY machine. What do others think of the quality? As expected. Marley looks fine and, well the colors of the hammock is your choice... That's good to learn ..... yet Marley is my son's dog, as is the hammock! I suspect the latter was bought in the USA when my son was serving there! How would DB change the pictures appearance without parsing and altering the file? ^^^Retorical question!^^^ http://www.dictionary.com/browse/rhetorical I might have a play with GIMP https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GIMP Is there a better way? Why are you asking for a bitmap editor recommendation? Dropbox won't alter your files. -- teleportation kills |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
What comes after Dropbox?
On Tue, 28 Mar 2017 13:50:29 +0100, "David B."
wrote: On 28/03/2017 02:43, philo wrote: On 03/27/2017 05:49 PM, Eric Stevens wrote: I've been using Dropbox quite satisfactorily, for several years, to provide links to photographs I want to post to the Internet. Now they have changed the way they work and I am not atll satisfied with either the way they work or what they seem to do to images. I have one image which I have been trying to post in response to an article by Savageduck in which we were discussing a collection of landscape photographs. All I can manage with Dropbox is coarse fine-detail and obvious color banding in the sky. I know there are various ways in which I can replace Dropbox but it will take me a long time to explore them all. I would be grateful for any suggestions as to the best way I can go about replacing Dropbox. Dropbox works fine for me but some folks say it takes a while for the images to load This is one of my favorite images I've saved there! https://www.dropbox.com/s/b55p0t1fio...amock.jpg?dl=0 It looks good on MY machine. What do others think of the quality? It looks good on mine too. When did you send it to Dropbox? -- Regards, Eric Stevens |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
What comes after Dropbox?
On Tue, 28 Mar 2017 18:03:04 +0200, android wrote:
In article , "David B." wrote: On 28/03/2017 13:57, android wrote: In article , "David B." wrote: On 28/03/2017 02:43, philo wrote: On 03/27/2017 05:49 PM, Eric Stevens wrote: I've been using Dropbox quite satisfactorily, for several years, to provide links to photographs I want to post to the Internet. Now they have changed the way they work and I am not atll satisfied with either the way they work or what they seem to do to images. I have one image which I have been trying to post in response to an article by Savageduck in which we were discussing a collection of landscape photographs. All I can manage with Dropbox is coarse fine-detail and obvious color banding in the sky. I know there are various ways in which I can replace Dropbox but it will take me a long time to explore them all. I would be grateful for any suggestions as to the best way I can go about replacing Dropbox. Dropbox works fine for me but some folks say it takes a while for the images to load This is one of my favorite images I've saved there! https://www.dropbox.com/s/b55p0t1fio...amock.jpg?dl=0 It looks good on MY machine. What do others think of the quality? As expected. Marley looks fine and, well the colors of the hammock is your choice... That's good to learn ..... yet Marley is my son's dog, as is the hammock! I suspect the latter was bought in the USA when my son was serving there! How would DB change the pictures appearance without parsing and altering the file? ^^^Retorical question!^^^ http://www.dictionary.com/browse/rhetorical I might have a play with GIMP https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GIMP Is there a better way? Why are you asking for a bitmap editor recommendation? Dropbox won't alter your files. That's exactly what I am complaining about. Of recent days it does seem to be altering my image files. I suspect they will remain intact on the Dropbox server for downloading as a file but they are definitely downgraded when they open in the Dropbox application which displays them to you. -- Regards, Eric Stevens |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Dropbox Traffic Limits | Savageduck[_3_] | Digital Photography | 1 | April 25th 15 10:05 PM |
Dropbox issue | PeterN[_4_] | Digital Photography | 3 | July 23rd 13 03:10 AM |
Curious - who uses Dropbox? | Alan Browne | Digital SLR Cameras | 42 | February 27th 12 09:31 AM |
Curious - who uses Dropbox? | Dennis Boone | 35mm Photo Equipment | 2 | February 25th 12 07:18 PM |