If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Fuji and the horror of complex lens variation
This thread was (or should be) terrifying for anyone buying
a camera/lens where the price is "artificially low." The 10x+ zooms on these cameras have great complexity. They are asked to zoom to 10x their lowest focal length, act as macro lenses, etc. All in a camera that costs around $700.00. The differences this guy found would be a "deal breaker" for anyone considering the camera who was looking for good performance. The question is, is this a fluke (bad product) or is this the range of variation one can expect with that model's lens?? -Rich http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/re...ssage=16010533 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Fuji and the horror of complex lens variation
The best quality long zoom range lenses right now appear to be the Leica
lenses supplied with the Panasonic FZ5/FZ20 series cameras. But even there, as with any bulk-manufactured product, an odd bad example may slip through. If someone is unhappy with the results they are getting, take the camera back to the shop where you bought it. The Fuji model you mention offers, I believe, a long zoom range lens with no image stabilisation - not a combination I would purchase today. David |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Fuji and the horror of complex lens variation
On $DATE , David J Taylor wrote:
The best quality long zoom range lenses right now appear to be the Leica lenses supplied with the Panasonic FZ5/FZ20 series cameras. But even there, as with any bulk-manufactured product, an odd bad example may slip through. If someone is unhappy with the results they are getting, take the camera back to the shop where you bought it. The Fuji model you mention offers, I believe, a long zoom range lens with no image stabilisation - not a combination I would purchase today. I just bought a Fuji S9000 and I'm delighted with it. There seems to be an "anti-fuji" element on this newsgroup and people need to do their own research to determine which camera is best for them. Talk to many people, face to face where possible, and consider the source for your information. There is a lot of competition in this industry and some company's are not above organizing "trash talk campaigns" to discredit their competitors. -- Regards, Fred. (Please remove FFFf from my email address to reply, if by email) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Fuji and the horror of complex lens variation
Fred Williams wrote:
On $DATE , David J Taylor wrote: snip The Fuji model you mention offers, I believe, a long zoom range lens with no image stabilisation - not a combination I would purchase today. I just bought a Fuji S9000 and I'm delighted with it. There seems to be an "anti-fuji" element on this newsgroup and people need to do their own research to determine which camera is best for them. I'm not convinced about a specific "anti Fuji" bias, just a desire to talk up the latest tech and disparage anything that isn't "leading edge" technology. I had owned a Minolta DiMage 7i for 3 years (until the Sony 5mp sensor died and it was replaced free with an A200 by Konica Minolta) and it was perhaps one of the best digicams that I've owned. No stabilisation and (only!) 5mp, but because of the lack of moving parts (no mirror slap or big shutter to impart shake) I was able to hand-hold to half (or less) the shutter speed suggested by the old 1/(focal length) rule of thumb and still get nice sharp pictures. Assuming that the lens on your digicam has good contrast and sharpness, then it is realy up to "the nut behind the lens" to do their job :-) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Fuji and the horror of complex lens variation
Fred Williams wrote:
On $DATE , David J Taylor wrote: The best quality long zoom range lenses right now appear to be the Leica lenses supplied with the Panasonic FZ5/FZ20 series cameras. But even there, as with any bulk-manufactured product, an odd bad example may slip through. If someone is unhappy with the results they are getting, take the camera back to the shop where you bought it. The Fuji model you mention offers, I believe, a long zoom range lens with no image stabilisation - not a combination I would purchase today. I just bought a Fuji S9000 and I'm delighted with it. There seems to be an "anti-fuji" element on this newsgroup and people need to do their own research to determine which camera is best for them. Talk to many people, face to face where possible, and consider the source for your information. There is a lot of competition in this industry and some company's are not above organizing "trash talk campaigns" to discredit their competitors. Fred, I am sure you are not suggesting that I am in any way part of such a campaign. I would love the lower noise of certain Fuji sensors (if they have made a genuine advance there), but I stick by my views that: - anything mass-produced may have the occasional bad item, which should be replaced immediately by the supplier - a long zoom without image stabilisation is not something I would buy or recommend to others. I'm pleased that your new purchase is doing what /you/ need. David |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Fuji and the horror of complex lens variation
"David J Taylor"
wrote in message . uk... Fred Williams wrote: On $DATE , David J Taylor wrote: The best quality long zoom range lenses right now appear to be the Leica lenses supplied with the Panasonic FZ5/FZ20 series cameras. But even there, as with any bulk-manufactured product, an odd bad example may slip through. If someone is unhappy with the results they are getting, take the camera back to the shop where you bought it. The Fuji model you mention offers, I believe, a long zoom range lens with no image stabilisation - not a combination I would purchase today. I just bought a Fuji S9000 and I'm delighted with it. There seems to be an "anti-fuji" element on this newsgroup and people need to do their own research to determine which camera is best for them. Talk to many people, face to face where possible, and consider the source for your information. There is a lot of competition in this industry and some company's are not above organizing "trash talk campaigns" to discredit their competitors. Fred, I am sure you are not suggesting that I am in any way part of such a campaign. I would love the lower noise of certain Fuji sensors (if they have made a genuine advance there), but I stick by my views that: - anything mass-produced may have the occasional bad item, which should be replaced immediately by the supplier - a long zoom without image stabilisation is not something I would buy or recommend to others. I'm pleased that your new purchase is doing what /you/ need. David Hi all. My wife has had a Fuji S5500, with the 10x Zoom, for a year now. She is no "Expert" photographer, but when saving and tweaking her Pics, I can see no signs of "Shake" or any major lens faults. I have printed a number of her pics at 10 x 8, and there is nothing wrong with the quality. I suspect there seems to be certain amount of bias, on this group, not so much against Fuji, but in favour of the Leica badged lenses of another maker. A real Leica lens on a camera costing less than $2000, come on, who is kidding who. Roy G |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Fuji and the horror of complex lens variation
"Fred Williams" wrote in message ... On $DATE , David J Taylor wrote: The best quality long zoom range lenses right now appear to be the Leica lenses supplied with the Panasonic FZ5/FZ20 series cameras. But even there, as with any bulk-manufactured product, an odd bad example may slip through. If someone is unhappy with the results they are getting, take the camera back to the shop where you bought it. The Fuji model you mention offers, I believe, a long zoom range lens with no image stabilisation - not a combination I would purchase today. I just bought a Fuji S9000 and I'm delighted with it. There seems to be an "anti-fuji" element on this newsgroup and people need to do their own research to determine which camera is best for them. Talk to many people, face to face where possible, and consider the source for your information. There is a lot of competition in this industry and some company's are not above organizing "trash talk campaigns" to discredit their competitors. I agree with you. The blurry pictures seemed to be plainly out of focus or shaky. The article is biased. Even a cheap digicam cannot take a photo that bad. It is not the lens's fault if the camera holder uses a long zoom and cannot hold the camera still. Wannabe ======= |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Fuji and the horror of complex lens variation
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Fuji and the horror of complex lens variation
Tesco News wrote:
[] I suspect there seems to be certain amount of bias, on this group, not so much against Fuji, but in favour of the Leica badged lenses of another maker. A real Leica lens on a camera costing less than $2000, come on, who is kidding who. Roy G It's simple. If you compare the images produced, the Leica lens wins. David |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Fuji and the horror of complex lens variation
"Fred Williams" wrote in message ... On $DATE , David J Taylor wrote: The best quality long zoom range lenses right now appear to be the Leica lenses supplied with the Panasonic FZ5/FZ20 series cameras. But even there, as with any bulk-manufactured product, an odd bad example may slip through. If someone is unhappy with the results they are getting, take the camera back to the shop where you bought it. The Fuji model you mention offers, I believe, a long zoom range lens with no image stabilisation - not a combination I would purchase today. I just bought a Fuji S9000 and I'm delighted with it. There seems to be an "anti-fuji" element on this newsgroup and people need to do their own research to determine which camera is best for them. No, it is more likely that Fuji owners are thin skinned. I for one own Nikon gear. They make some great lenses, some very good ones, and a few that are best ignored. Jim |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|