Mac users - be aware

On 8/6/2015 8:29 PM, Tony Cooper wrote:
On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 20:09:08 -0400, nospam
wrote:

In article , PeterN
wrote:

selling apps is big business. apps use the cloud. apps are not going
away.

twisting.

there is no twisting.

Cough! cough!

take some medicine.

you said 'many software publishers would like to see that happen'
(quoted above), referring to users not being able to install apps.


Yep!

that is flat out *false*.


How do you KNOW that.

because i'm a software developer and know far more about what goes on
in the industry than you ever will.

One of your biggest problems is your total failure
to distinguish fact from opinion. You have absolutely no proof of what
all software developers

i never said anything about all software developers.

more of your lies and twists.

you said 'many software developers' want it, which is totally false.

it's as simple as that.

The above opinions about what software developers want is based on a
survey of Coach Class passengers taken by nospam during a flight to
the annual Second Tier Software Developers Conference and Job Fair in
Cleveland, Ohio.


Actually he doesn't appear know the difference between a developer and a
publisher.


--
PeterN

On 8/6/2015 8:36 PM, nospam wrote:
In article , Tony Cooper
wrote:

The above opinions about what software developers want is based on a
survey of Coach Class passengers taken by nospam during a flight to
the annual Second Tier Software Developers Conference and Job Fair in
Cleveland, Ohio.

you are truly a moron.


Good answer. It really explains your indefensible position.

--
PeterN

In article , PeterN
wrote:

you said 'many software publishers would like to see that happen'
(quoted above), referring to users not being able to install apps.


Yep!

that is flat out *false*.


How do you KNOW that.

because i'm a software developer and know far more about what goes on
in the industry than you ever will.

One of your biggest problems is your total failure
to distinguish fact from opinion. You have absolutely no proof of what
all software developers

i never said anything about all software developers.

more of your lies and twists.

you said 'many software developers' want it, which is totally false.

I did not say that.

you are a liar.

you absolutely did say that:

In article , PeterN
wrote:
It strikes me as being bad form to let users have physical access to
their computers and even worse form to allow them permissions to
install anything on them. Bring back the mainframe I say.

Many software publishers would like to see that happen. Except, what you
call mainframe, they call the cloud.

Bring back dumb terminals.


and then you confirmed it again (quoted above):
you said 'many software publishers would like to see that happen'
(quoted above), referring to users not being able to install apps.


Yep!


now you are claiming you did not. you are a liar.

Do learn to read.

i learned to read long ago.

i also learned to catch liars long ago.

In article , PeterN
wrote:

Is this the same nospam who, about a few year ago, that OSX was not
subject to hacker attacks.

i never said anything even close to that.

Wrong.

it's not wrong, because i never said anything of the sort.

either link to the actual post or just admit you're babbling.

In article , PeterN
wrote:


Actually he doesn't appear know the difference between a developer and a
publisher.

the difference does not matter and it's usually the same anyway.

you're playing word games because you know you're full of ****.

On 8/7/2015 3:41 AM, Sandman wrote:
In article , PeterN wrote:

AnthonyL:
It strikes me as being bad form to let users have
physical access to their computers and even worse form
to allow them permissions to install anything on them.
Bring back the mainframe I say.

PeterN:
Many software publishers would like to see that happen.
Except, what you call mainframe, they call the cloud.

nospam:
no they wouldn't.

PeterN:
The all knowing speaks again, for all publishers.

nospam:
as if you do?

PeterN:
Never claimed that, you proposed to speak for all.

nospam:
selling apps is big business. apps use the cloud. apps are not
going away.

PeterN:
twisting.

nospam:
there is no twisting.

you said 'many software publishers would like to see that happen'
(quoted above), referring to users not being able to install apps.

Yep!

nospam:
that is flat out *false*.

How do you KNOW that. One of your biggest problems is your total
failure to distinguish fact from opinion. You have absolutely no
proof of what all software developers

This is your claim:

"Many software publishers would like to see that happen."

This is nospam's response:

"no they wouldn't."

So you're making a claim about what "many" wants, and nospam is saying they
don't, yet you are questioning his certainty but not your own. Ironic.



The difference is I am stating an opinion. nospam is claiming his
statement to be a fact.

Ironic that you are ignoring that slight difference. Of course you
wouldn't be trolling again, or would you.

--
PeterN

In article , PeterN
wrote:

This is your claim:

"Many software publishers would like to see that happen."

This is nospam's response:

"no they wouldn't."

So you're making a claim about what "many" wants, and nospam is saying they
don't, yet you are questioning his certainty but not your own. Ironic.


The difference is I am stating an opinion. nospam is claiming his
statement to be a fact.

you're backpedalling.

On 8/7/2015 1:19 PM, nospam wrote:
In article , PeterN
wrote:

you said 'many software publishers would like to see that happen'
(quoted above), referring to users not being able to install apps.


Yep!

that is flat out *false*.


How do you KNOW that.

because i'm a software developer and know far more about what goes on
in the industry than you ever will.

One of your biggest problems is your total failure
to distinguish fact from opinion. You have absolutely no proof of what
all software developers

i never said anything about all software developers.

more of your lies and twists.

you said 'many software developers' want it, which is totally false.

I did not say that.

you are a liar.

you absolutely did say that:

In article , PeterN
wrote:
It strikes me as being bad form to let users have physical access to
their computers and even worse form to allow them permissions to
install anything on them. Bring back the mainframe I say.

Many software publishers would like to see that happen. Except, what you
call mainframe, they call the cloud.

Bring back dumb terminals.


and then you confirmed it again (quoted above):
you said 'many software publishers would like to see that happen'
(quoted above), referring to users not being able to install apps.


Yep!


now you are claiming you did not. you are a liar.

Do learn to read.

i learned to read long ago.

i also learned to catch liars long ago.


It's obvious you do not know the difference between a software publisher
and developer.

Keep ranting though, that's your style.

EOD

--
PeterN

On 8/7/2015 1:19 PM, nospam wrote:
In article , PeterN
wrote:

Is this the same nospam who, about a few year ago, that OSX was not
subject to hacker attacks.

i never said anything even close to that.

Wrong.

it's not wrong, because i never said anything of the sort.

either link to the actual post or just admit you're babbling.


So you now say.

--
PeterN

On 8/7/2015 1:19 PM, nospam wrote:
In article , PeterN
wrote:


Actually he doesn't appear know the difference between a developer and a
publisher.

the difference does not matter and it's usually the same anyway.

you're playing word games because you know you're full of ****.


Something you never do. You tried to twist, got caught, and now you
accuse me of playing word games. You are pathetic

--
PeterN