If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Newbee Question Telephoto Lense
I recently bought a Nikon D70s as my first digital camera. It came with a
18-70 MM lense (3.5-4.5) I'm still in the beginners learning curve. I would like to buy a telephoto lense to expand my photo opportunities but am a little confused over the different lenses. In browsing on the Internet, and this newsgroup, I see 55-200mm, 70-200mm, and 70-300mm, etc. Nikon lenses. I'd appreciate some advise as to which telephoto lense would be most useful/efficient for me. I'm still learning to shoot digital but feel that my 18-70mm lense limits what I can shoot other then close ups (I don't have any specific telephotoshots in mind). Any sugestions would be appreciated. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"Sidney Friedman" wrote in message .. . I recently bought a Nikon D70s as my first digital camera. It came with a 18-70 MM lense (3.5-4.5) I'm still in the beginners learning curve. I would like to buy a telephoto lense to expand my photo opportunities but am a little confused over the different lenses. In browsing on the Internet, and this newsgroup, I see 55-200mm, 70-200mm, and 70-300mm, etc. Nikon lenses. I'd appreciate some advise as to which telephoto lense would be most useful/efficient for me. I'm still learning to shoot digital but feel that my 18-70mm lense limits what I can shoot other then close ups (I don't have any specific telephotoshots in mind). Any sugestions would be appreciated. Those are all common zoom telephotos for beginners. I was in nearly your shoes this spring, and I chose to add a 75-300mm Tamron to my Canon Digital Rebel + 18-55mm kit lens. What will you be shooting, and what is your budget? This lens is a staple for many photographers (the 70-200ish zoom), and buying a good one now may be worthwhile if you can put up $1100. Dave |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"Sidney Friedman" wrote:
I recently bought a Nikon D70s as my first digital camera. It came with a 18-70 MM lense (3.5-4.5) I'm still in the beginners learning curve. I would like to buy a telephoto lense to expand my photo opportunities but am a little confused over the different lenses. In browsing on the Internet, and this newsgroup, I see 55-200mm, 70-200mm, and 70-300mm, etc. Nikon lenses. I'd appreciate some advise as to which telephoto lense would be most useful/efficient for me. I'm still learning to shoot digital but feel that my 18-70mm lense limits what I can shoot other then close ups (I don't have any specific telephotoshots in mind). Any sugestions would be appreciated. It's pretty hard to pick a lense without any idea what you are going to do with it! Of course, when you are learning... that's half the fun too; you go buy a lense and then find out if it is fun for you, or not. With a Nikon you have a huge range of possibilities, because you can go cheap, or you can go professional quality too. For example, if you are willing to invest the necessary coins, lenses that have wider f/stops are more productive, and so are lenses with optics good enough to shoot wide open. The best demonstration of the difference in quality between lower cost and higher cost lenses is perhaps in the 400 to 600mm telephoto range. You can buy any of several brands of 500mm mirror lenses, or a fair number of zooms that range up to 400-500mm, any of which sell new for less than $200. You can even get good pictures with them too! It just requires the right circumstances and knowing what the limitations are. But you can't just go out and shoot the same kind of shots that you see in the magazines... because those lenses are *all* pretty crummy! A good 400-600mm f/4 lense costs real money. But you can use it wide open... in light where the others won't work. That particular focal length is a useful example because the price range is wide and matches the quality of the product, and the feature range is not as significant. Except for the feature range the same is true, but with not quite the same exaggerated results, for shorter focal lengths. In addition to wider apertures and better optics when shooting wide open, another point is the quality of the auto focus mechanism. It may not bother you if it is slow when you are shooting pictures of a landscape. But sporting events, as one example, often involve rapid changes in distances and the (in)ability to follow the action makes or breaks which lense is suitable. Inexpensive lenses limit your photo opportunities. So what you might do depends on which lense you buy. And what you want to do obviously affects which lense you should buy. I would recommend, for example, that quality be a higher priority than features. Wider apertures and better optics trump more zoom range. For example, your current zoom has a very useful focal length range, but won't handle many available light situations well. You might consider pair of fixed focal length lenses, for example a 20mm f/2.8 and a 50mm f/1.8 lense. The 50mm lense is relatively inexpensive, but a 20mm f/2.8 is a bit more costly. The next step up in focal length is a little different. I would recommend you take a long look at finding a used Nikon 80-200mm f/2.8 ED AF lense. There are several different variations, so do some research and figure out which one is the right one. They have a very well deserved reputation. For example, I would take that any day over a Sigma 50-500mm zoom, which is probably the best of the other telephoto zooms. But everyone has different priorities, so the f/2.8 aperture that I find essential may not be as important for you. -- FloydL. Davidson http://www.apaflo.com/floyd_davidson Ukpeagvik (Barrow, Alaska) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks for your replies David and Floyd,
I would prefer not to spend more then $200-$300 for a telephoto lens until I'm more expert. I suppose my main purpose of the lens would be for nature shots where I can't get too close and for shooting objects and scenes from a distance. Another question I have is am I limited to Nikon lenses or would any AF brand do? I would prefer Nikon due to the quality. My wife has telephoto and fisheye lenses on her Nikon 35mm film camera but I don't think they are compatible with my D70s. "David Geesaman" wrote in message ... "Sidney Friedman" wrote in message .. . I recently bought a Nikon D70s as my first digital camera. It came with a 18-70 MM lense (3.5-4.5) I'm still in the beginners learning curve. I would like to buy a telephoto lense to expand my photo opportunities but am a little confused over the different lenses. In browsing on the Internet, and this newsgroup, I see 55-200mm, 70-200mm, and 70-300mm, etc. Nikon lenses. I'd appreciate some advise as to which telephoto lense would be most useful/efficient for me. I'm still learning to shoot digital but feel that my 18-70mm lense limits what I can shoot other then close ups (I don't have any specific telephotoshots in mind). Any sugestions would be appreciated. Those are all common zoom telephotos for beginners. I was in nearly your shoes this spring, and I chose to add a 75-300mm Tamron to my Canon Digital Rebel + 18-55mm kit lens. What will you be shooting, and what is your budget? This lens is a staple for many photographers (the 70-200ish zoom), and buying a good one now may be worthwhile if you can put up $1100. Dave |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"Sidney Friedman" wrote in message ... Thanks for your replies David and Floyd, I would prefer not to spend more then $200-$300 for a telephoto lens until I'm more expert. Been there, done that. But within 3 months I was finding the limitations already. But I shoot a lot of sports, and fast autofocus and wider apertures (reasons I want to upgrade) will mean a lot less for your intended purposes. As well, the cheaper lenses are usually lighter. Not as durable in absorbing abuse, but easier to carry about in the field. Just watch shooting these cheap lenses wide open - if you keep them around f/8 you'll get consistently sharper results than wide open. I suppose my main purpose of the lens would be for nature shots where I can't get too close and for shooting objects and scenes from a distance. Another question I have is am I limited to Nikon lenses or would any AF brand do? Any will do, but Nikons are well regarded, and the only option at the top of the line. The only thing you may find is needing to use a tripod or monopod for longer shots if you're using slower shutter speeds. In sports, I usually have 1/250s or faster, so camera shake is less of an issue. I would prefer Nikon due to the quality. My wife has telephoto and fisheye lenses on her Nikon 35mm film camera but I don't think they are compatible with my D70s. I'm a Canon guy, but I *think* all Nikon AF lenses, film or digital, are compatible. That's one of their selling points over the Canon lenses. By all means, test hers first. I suspect you'll be quite happy with any $200 telephoto zoom combined with a monopod. Light, mobile, fast, and affordable. Of course, that's assuming you don't use your wife's lens. Dave |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
"Sidney Friedman" wrote:
Thanks for your replies David and Floyd, I would prefer not to spend more then $200-$300 for a telephoto lens until I'm more expert. Can you learn to be an expert without using the tools of an expert? I suppose my main purpose of the lens would be for nature shots where I can't get too close and for shooting objects and scenes from a distance. For a lot of things a zoom that goes up to 200 or 300mm would be just the ticket. For other things, birds for example, 500-600mm is about the minimum. What kind of nature shots??? Hummingbirds at 100 yards are one thing, and the lady across the street is another. Another question I have is am I limited to Nikon lenses or would any AF brand do? I would prefer Nikon due to the quality. When it comes to telephoto, Nikon's quality is *great*... but you can't buy it for $200-$300. As far as auto focus, just about all of the various manufacturers are selling AF lenses that work with Nikon cameras. As I noted, some of them work better (faster, smoother, less noise) than others. Note that the maximum aperature makes a difference too, because the camera cannot sense proper focus without enough light. My wife has telephoto and fisheye lenses on her Nikon 35mm film camera but I don't think they are compatible with my D70s. I'm not sure about the D70. I would assume that the fisheye is *not* something you want to try. The rear lense element probably sticks back into the camera too far... The telephoto probably does "work". But how well depends. If this is an AF lense, it probably works perfectly! Note the effective focal length on a digital camera is 1.5 times that of what it is on the film camera, because the sensor is smaller than the film image. Hence a 100mm lense gives the same results on a digital Nikon as would a 150mm lense on a film Nikon. If it is an older AI lense, it of course can't auto focus, but metering will work. There are a lot of charts available, which you can find with google. The D70 will not work with pre-AI (manual focus lenses made before 1977) and will not work with F3AF lenses (early 1980's?). It will work with everything else. With AI, AI-S and E lenses the metering will not work. With anything else you get full functionality of the lense, hence a manual focus lense will require manual focusing. What kind of film camera is it, and what is the designation of the lense? (And how precious is it to the boss?) -- FloydL. Davidson http://www.apaflo.com/floyd_davidson Ukpeagvik (Barrow, Alaska) |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Most Nikon lenses are usable in some fashion on the D70s. You do not
get full function usage of autofocus/metering with all. There is a page in the D70s manual that details which are not compatible. Lenses that require that the mirror be locked up (Nikon 21mm/f4 for example) cannot be used. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Floyd Davidson wrote:
Can you learn to be an expert without using the tools of an expert? With all due respect, I don't think one's equipment has much to do with it, as long as you're not using complete trash. Eugene Atget took pictures in the 1920s that are superior to what most of us probably do today, and his tools were much more primitive; he started in 1897 with equipment that was obsolete even then. -- Oh to have a lodge in some vast wilderness. Where rumors of oppression and deceit, of unsuccessful and successful wars may never reach me anymore. -- William Cowper |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Sidney Friedman wrote:
I recently bought a Nikon D70s as my first digital camera. It came with a 18-70 MM lense (3.5-4.5) I'm still in the beginners learning curve. I would like to buy a telephoto lense to expand my photo opportunities but am a little confused over the different lenses. I took some comparison shots with the Nikon 70-300G and the Nikon 70-300D ED and found the ED version to have much better contrast. I was going to buy the ED at AUS$679 when the camera shop lowered the price of the G from AUS$359 to AUS$200. Figured I'd save the money and put it towards a better zoom later. This and several other pictures here were taken with the 70-300G http://web.aanet.com.au/miwa/mike/photos/photo35.html -Mike |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
Floyd Davidson wrote: If it is an older AI lense, it of course can't auto focus, but metering will work. In which universe is that? With AI, AI-S and E lenses the metering will not work. Ah, not in this universe then. With anything else you get full functionality of the lense, hence a manual focus lense will require manual focusing. The simple rule is (but there are exceptions): with manual focus lenses the light meter in the D70 will not work. -- That was it. Done. The faulty Monk was turned out into the desert where it could believe what it liked, including the idea that it had been hard done by. It was allowed to keep its horse, since horses were so cheap to make. -- Douglas Adams in Dirk Gently's Holistic Detective Agency |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Sony V3, telephoto accessory lense? | [email protected] | Digital Photography | 1 | March 20th 05 05:37 PM |
Nikon D70 and Nikkor 28-200 3.5-5.6D lense | Maintane | Digital SLR Cameras | 7 | February 20th 05 12:46 AM |
"telephoto" - another definition problem | RolandRB | Medium Format Photography Equipment | 36 | February 14th 05 01:25 PM |
"telephoto" - another definition problem | RolandRB | Medium Format Photography Equipment | 0 | February 3rd 05 07:42 AM |
FA: Genuine Canon wide angle and Telephoto lenses for A80 A95 digital cameras ------ UK ONLY | Ian | Digital Photo Equipment For Sale | 0 | November 8th 04 06:38 AM |