If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
D70 in today's marketplace?
Since going digital I haven't bought another SLR, since with my kids I
usually have my hands full. My current compact has more or less full manual controls (Canon S80), but the low-light performance is not good, and images are not sharp near the edges at short focal lengths. Also I'd like to be able to bounce the flash. I'm considering an inexpensive dSLR and a fast wide angle prime, to use around the house and other times when the bulk isn't an issue. I have a friend with a disused D70 (upgraded to D200 a couple years ago), who would probably sell it to me at a good price (I haven't asked, but maybe $300 with a kit lens? Probably less if I asked but I don't want to be a jerk.) My question: with the newer options now on the market, is it advisable to get an older midrange camera, or a new budget camera instead? It's hard to find reviews that directly make this comparison. When I look at the market for other used electronics, such as laptops or mp3 players, new ones seem to be the better option. 6.1MP won't allow for a whole lot of cropping, but then at least they'd be high quality pixels. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
D70 in today's marketplace?
Thanks for the tip on the lens kit. I don't know which his is, but I'll
ask. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
D70 in today's marketplace?
flambe wrote:
If the camera is in good condition with the 18-70 lens then he is practically gifting it to you at $300. The only drawback of the D70 is that the viewfinder is a bit small and dim compared with the D80. Sensor size is not an issue in any way shape or form for your uses. Has high-ISO sensor performance improved at all in the last 4 years? Or is it just a function of sensor size and (for still subjects) image stabilization? This is the single biggest factor for me; on my S80, ISO 400 is "emergency use only," and even 200 is noticeably worse than 100. The faster lenses of SLRs will surely help, but high ISO is important too. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
D70 in today's marketplace?
If the camera is in good condition with the 18-70 lens then he is
practically gifting it to you at $300. The only drawback of the D70 is that the viewfinder is a bit small and dim compared with the D80. Sensor size is not an issue in any way shape or form for your uses. While a dSLR can be used in P&S mode with jpeg recording you will not see the full potential of the camera unless you learn to use raw. However dSLR image quality in jpegs, particularly the Nikon dSLRs, should be much better than what you are seeing in your P&S. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
D70 in today's marketplace?
On Dec 24, 4:36 am, timeOday wrote:
Since going digital I haven't bought another SLR, since with my kids I usually have my hands full. My current compact has more or less full manual controls (Canon S80), but the low-light performance is not good, and images are not sharp near the edges at short focal lengths. Also I'd like to be able to bounce the flash. I'm considering an inexpensive dSLR and a fast wide angle prime, to use around the house and other times when the bulk isn't an issue. I have a friend with a disused D70 (upgraded to D200 a couple years ago), who would probably sell it to me at a good price (I haven't asked, but maybe $300 with a kit lens? Probably less if I asked but I don't want to be a jerk.) My question: with the newer options now on the market, is it advisable to get an older midrange camera, or a new budget camera instead? It's hard to find reviews that directly make this comparison. When I look at the market for other used electronics, such as laptops or mp3 players, new ones seem to be the better option. 6.1MP won't allow for a whole lot of cropping, but then at least they'd be high quality pixels. It's a reliable camera and it's output will blow away any P&S. $300 with an 18-55mm kit lens is a good price. Used D70s and 50s routinely go for $400+ on Ebay. Plus, there are no Nikons in the entry level now that offer the control and build quality of the D70, the next up is the D80 and it's $800+ for the body. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
D70 in today's marketplace?
On Mon, 24 Dec 2007 02:36:56 -0700, timeOday wrote:
Since going digital I haven't bought another SLR, since with my kids I usually have my hands full. My current compact has more or less full manual controls (Canon S80), but the low-light performance is not good, and images are not sharp near the edges at short focal lengths. Also I'd like to be able to bounce the flash. I'm considering an inexpensive dSLR and a fast wide angle prime, to use around the house and other times when the bulk isn't an issue. I have a friend with a disused D70 (upgraded to D200 a couple years ago), who would probably sell it to me at a good price (I haven't asked, but maybe $300 with a kit lens? Probably less if I asked but I don't want to be a jerk.) My question: with the newer options now on the market, is it advisable to get an older midrange camera, or a new budget camera instead? It's hard to find reviews that directly make this comparison. When I look at the market for other used electronics, such as laptops or mp3 players, new ones seem to be the better option. 6.1MP won't allow for a whole lot of cropping, but then at least they'd be high quality pixels. That's a very good price, particularly if the kit lens is the 18-70 rather than the 18-55. The prices on new Nikons start at ~$500 for a D40, which has the same 6 MP resolution. If you want 10 MP, that's either a D40X (~$800) or a D80 (~$1000) -dms |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
D70 in today's marketplace?
On Mon, 24 Dec 2007 18:53:22 GMT, Daniel Silevitch wrote:
That's a very good price, particularly if the kit lens is the 18-70 rather than the 18-55. The prices on new Nikons start at ~$500 for a D40, which has the same 6 MP resolution. If you want 10 MP, that's either a D40X (~$800) or a D80 (~$1000) Forgot to mention that the latter two prices are with the 18-135 lens rather than the 18-55. The D40X with an 18-55 is $600. -dms |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
D70 in today's marketplace?
timeOday wrote:
I have a friend with a disused D70 (upgraded to D200 a couple years ago), who would probably sell it to me at a good price (I haven't asked, but maybe $300 with a kit lens? Probably less if I asked but I don't want to be a jerk.) keh.com might give you some used prices to compare. No D70 listed now, although they have a D50 with 18-135 F3.5-5.6 lens for $645. New D40 with 18-55 for $475, refurbs I've seen elsewhere for $400. The EN-EL3 battery used in the D70 had a recall; check the nikonusa.com page. -- Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota * USA |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
D70 in today's marketplace?
On Mon, 24 Dec 2007 06:50:51 -0700, timeOday wrote:
flambe wrote: If the camera is in good condition with the 18-70 lens then he is practically gifting it to you at $300. The only drawback of the D70 is that the viewfinder is a bit small and dim compared with the D80. Sensor size is not an issue in any way shape or form for your uses. Has high-ISO sensor performance improved at all in the last 4 years? Or is it just a function of sensor size and (for still subjects) image stabilization? Pretty much any DSLR will be much much better at high-ISO than most any P&S. There are some distinctions between different DSLR models, but it's relatively minor compared to the big gap between the large-sensor DSLRs and the small-sensor compacts. This is the single biggest factor for me; on my S80, ISO 400 is "emergency use only," and even 200 is noticeably worse than 100. The faster lenses of SLRs will surely help, but high ISO is important too. On my D80, anything up to ISO1600 is reasonable (above 1000, you see noise entering, but it's not too bad), and you can go up to 3200 if you're desperate. The D70 should be able to do at least as well, possibly a bit better due to the smaller number of pixels (which means more light-gathering area per pixel). Pair it with the fast primes you mentioned in your original message, and you'll be in pretty good shape. An example image from a D70 at ISO 1600 is he http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/NikonD70/page23.asp -dms |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
D70 in today's marketplace?
"timeOday" I have a friend with a disused D70 (upgraded to D200 a couple years ago), who would probably sell it to me at a good price (I haven't asked, but maybe $300 with a kit lens? Probably less if I asked but I don't want to be a jerk.) The day after I got my D300, I put my D70 on eBay, body only. It went for $310. If you can get a D70 with lens for $300, take it. The D70 is a fantasic camera. I loved mine, and even though I have the newest and shiniest, I hated to give up the reliable D70. Chris |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Today's Eagle | C J Campbell | Digital SLR Cameras | 4 | June 3rd 07 03:53 AM |
Today's shots | Charles Schuler | Digital SLR Cameras | 7 | March 18th 05 12:05 AM |
Today's shots | Charles Schuler | Digital Photography | 6 | March 16th 05 07:31 PM |
Today's shots | paul | Digital Photography | 1 | March 16th 05 01:51 AM |
Today's last day - Elite Pro 1 GB CF for $44 | Renee | Digital Photography | 4 | March 5th 05 10:32 PM |