If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Will the frame buffer on Rebel XT 'speed up' slow CF memory?
I scraped to get a Rebel XT. As a consequence, I can't really cough up
the $200 for a fast CF card. It means older, cheaper CF memory for me. It got me thinking- will I ever notice? Now that the Rebel XT can buffer up 14 frames, I wondering how often I would shoot more then 14 before the camera had a chance to write them to CF. Is this logic right? Shooting video sounds like it might be a problem. DV video is something like 720k, 30 times a second. Depending on what it compresses to, it might be a problem. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
http://www.robgalbraith.com/bins/mul...?cid=6007-7699
"Lee" wrote in message m... I scraped to get a Rebel XT. As a consequence, I can't really cough up the $200 for a fast CF card. It means older, cheaper CF memory for me. It got me thinking- will I ever notice? Now that the Rebel XT can buffer up 14 frames, I wondering how often I would shoot more then 14 before the camera had a chance to write them to CF. Is this logic right? Shooting video sounds like it might be a problem. DV video is something like 720k, 30 times a second. Depending on what it compresses to, it might be a problem. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"Lee" wrote in message m... I scraped to get a Rebel XT. As a consequence, I can't really cough up the $200 for a fast CF card. It means older, cheaper CF memory for me. It got me thinking- will I ever notice? Now that the Rebel XT can buffer up 14 frames, I wondering how often I would shoot more then 14 before the camera had a chance to write them to CF. Is this logic right? I would highly recommend a SanDisk Ultra II but to answer your question you get 14 shots and then it just slows down. It will keep shooting at around 1.5 fps after the buffer fills. Greg |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 10 Jun 2005 18:08:26 -0700, "G.T."
wrote: "Lee" wrote in message om... I scraped to get a Rebel XT. As a consequence, I can't really cough up the $200 for a fast CF card. It means older, cheaper CF memory for me. It got me thinking- will I ever notice? Now that the Rebel XT can buffer up 14 frames, I wondering how often I would shoot more then 14 before the camera had a chance to write them to CF. Is this logic right? I would highly recommend a SanDisk Ultra II but to answer your question you get 14 shots and then it just slows down. It will keep shooting at around 1.5 fps after the buffer fills. Greg For my XT I purchased a pair of 256MB Kingston Pro CF cards. I've had absolutely no problems with multiple bursts of 3-5 frames but have not tried the full loan of 14. Just my $.02 worth. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Lee wrote:
I scraped to get a Rebel XT. As a consequence, I can't really cough up the $200 for a fast CF card. It means older, cheaper CF memory for me. It got me thinking- will I ever notice? Now that the Rebel XT can buffer up 14 frames, I wondering how often I would shoot more then 14 before the camera had a chance to write them to CF. Is this logic right? The shooting style and subjects matter. If you shoot eg. action photos you'll need probably all the speed you can get. If you're into landscapes I doupt you'll ever have the buffer full situation. The speed shows up in how quickly the pictures are stored once the buffer is full. Faster with a faster card. It shows up in how quickly you can copy the card to a computer too (a minor advantage I think). For most situations it won't show up for me. I've got a Kingston Elite Pro (1Gb around $100 or so). It is fast enough that the buffer never fills up if I'm shooting jpegs, once tried about 50 shots and thought that's enough for most situations It does fill up with raw but very rarely for me. I think buffer is capable of about 9 raw pictures and in action shooting (taking multiple frames 3 per sec) the buffer fills up easily. For occational burst here and there it won't fill up even with raw. Buffer helps a lot and if you shoot at more than about 1,5 frames/sec (for average 14 shots) it will get full, if not it won't and you'll gain nothing with a faster card. -- Harri |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
In article , Harri
Suomalainen wrote: Lee wrote: I scraped to get a Rebel XT. As a consequence, I can't really cough up the $200 for a fast CF card. It means older, cheaper CF memory for me. It got me thinking- will I ever notice? Now that the Rebel XT can buffer up 14 frames, I wondering how often I would shoot more then 14 before the camera had a chance to write them to CF. Is this logic right? The shooting style and subjects matter. If you shoot eg. action photos you'll need probably all the speed you can get. If you're into landscapes I doupt you'll ever have the buffer full situation. The speed shows up in how quickly the pictures are stored once the buffer is full. Faster with a faster card. It shows up in how quickly you can copy the card to a computer too (a minor advantage I think). For most situations it won't show up for me. I've got a Kingston Elite Pro (1Gb around $100 or so). It is fast enough that the buffer never fills up if I'm shooting jpegs, once tried about 50 shots and thought that's enough for most situations I have that card as well. I was surprised to see it was middle of the pack as far as speed in a 300D is concerned. http://www.robgalbraith.com/bins/mul...?cid=6007-7699 |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Harri Suomalainen wrote:
The speed shows up in how quickly the pictures are stored once the buffer is full. Faster with a faster card. It shows up in how quickly you can copy the card to a computer too (a minor advantage I think). For most situations it won't show up for me. I've got a Kingston Elite Pro (1Gb around $100 or so). It is fast enough that the buffer never fills up if I'm shooting jpegs, once tried about 50 shots and thought that's enough for most situations I just got a Sandisk 40x card for my D70. My old microdrive only allowed a three frame burst with raw + jpeg, now I can do 4 frames. I use it when trying to catch a bee in flight (for instance). Check you camera's write speed & get something that matches that. Anything more helps with downloading to the computer which took about 20 minutes for my 2GB microdrive. The new 40x card downloaded 100MB in 2 minutes. I haven't figured what those work out to in MB/second but at least I'm meeting the camera's specs now. It does fill up with raw but very rarely for me. I think buffer is capable of about 9 raw pictures and in action shooting (taking multiple frames 3 per sec) the buffer fills up easily. For occational burst here and there it won't fill up even with raw. Buffer helps a lot and if you shoot at more than about 1,5 frames/sec (for average 14 shots) it will get full, if not it won't and you'll gain nothing with a faster card. -- Harri -- Paul Furman http://www.edgehill.net/1 san francisco native plants |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
5 Things You Need to Know About Shutter Speed | [email protected] | Digital Photography | 0 | December 26th 04 04:25 PM |
Slow Speed Film Review ( from CTEIN 2001 ) | DColucci | 35mm Photo Equipment | 1 | December 9th 04 06:24 PM |
Toe speed of TMAX 400 (was fridge and heat problems) | Richard Knoppow | In The Darkroom | 192 | September 14th 04 01:59 AM |
Name of photographer who used slow slit shutter? | Daniel Kelly \(AKA Jack\) | Other Photographic Equipment | 12 | April 10th 04 05:08 AM |
Name of photographer who used slow slit shutter? | Daniel Kelly \(AKA Jack\) | General Photography Techniques | 6 | April 6th 04 01:55 PM |