A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Digital Photography » Digital SLR Cameras
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Will the frame buffer on Rebel XT 'speed up' slow CF memory?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 10th 05, 08:51 PM
Lee
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Will the frame buffer on Rebel XT 'speed up' slow CF memory?

I scraped to get a Rebel XT. As a consequence, I can't really cough up
the $200 for a fast CF card. It means older, cheaper CF memory for me.

It got me thinking- will I ever notice? Now that the Rebel XT can
buffer up 14 frames, I wondering how often I would shoot more then 14
before the camera had a chance to write them to CF. Is this logic right?

Shooting video sounds like it might be a problem. DV video is something
like 720k, 30 times a second. Depending on what it compresses to, it
might be a problem.
  #2  
Old June 10th 05, 09:13 PM
David Geesaman
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

http://www.robgalbraith.com/bins/mul...?cid=6007-7699

"Lee" wrote in message
m...
I scraped to get a Rebel XT. As a consequence, I can't really cough up the
$200 for a fast CF card. It means older, cheaper CF memory for me.

It got me thinking- will I ever notice? Now that the Rebel XT can buffer
up 14 frames, I wondering how often I would shoot more then 14 before the
camera had a chance to write them to CF. Is this logic right?

Shooting video sounds like it might be a problem. DV video is something
like 720k, 30 times a second. Depending on what it compresses to, it
might be a problem.



  #3  
Old June 11th 05, 02:08 AM
G.T.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Lee" wrote in message
m...
I scraped to get a Rebel XT. As a consequence, I can't really cough up
the $200 for a fast CF card. It means older, cheaper CF memory for me.

It got me thinking- will I ever notice? Now that the Rebel XT can
buffer up 14 frames, I wondering how often I would shoot more then 14
before the camera had a chance to write them to CF. Is this logic right?


I would highly recommend a SanDisk Ultra II but to answer your question you
get 14 shots and then it just slows down. It will keep shooting at around
1.5 fps after the buffer fills.

Greg


  #4  
Old June 11th 05, 03:45 AM
Bob_M
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Fri, 10 Jun 2005 18:08:26 -0700, "G.T."
wrote:


"Lee" wrote in message
om...
I scraped to get a Rebel XT. As a consequence, I can't really cough up
the $200 for a fast CF card. It means older, cheaper CF memory for me.

It got me thinking- will I ever notice? Now that the Rebel XT can
buffer up 14 frames, I wondering how often I would shoot more then 14
before the camera had a chance to write them to CF. Is this logic right?


I would highly recommend a SanDisk Ultra II but to answer your question you
get 14 shots and then it just slows down. It will keep shooting at around
1.5 fps after the buffer fills.

Greg


For my XT I purchased a pair of 256MB Kingston Pro CF cards. I've had
absolutely no problems with multiple bursts of 3-5 frames but have not
tried the full loan of 14. Just my $.02 worth.

  #5  
Old June 13th 05, 08:03 AM
Harri Suomalainen
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Lee wrote:
I scraped to get a Rebel XT. As a consequence, I can't really cough up
the $200 for a fast CF card. It means older, cheaper CF memory for me.

It got me thinking- will I ever notice? Now that the Rebel XT can
buffer up 14 frames, I wondering how often I would shoot more then 14
before the camera had a chance to write them to CF. Is this logic right?


The shooting style and subjects matter. If you shoot eg. action photos
you'll need probably all the speed you can get. If you're into
landscapes I doupt you'll ever have the buffer full situation.

The speed shows up in how quickly the pictures are stored once the
buffer is full. Faster with a faster card. It shows up in how quickly
you can copy the card to a computer too (a minor advantage I think). For
most situations it won't show up for me.

I've got a Kingston Elite Pro (1Gb around $100 or so). It is fast enough
that the buffer never fills up if I'm shooting jpegs, once tried about
50 shots and thought that's enough for most situations

It does fill up with raw but very rarely for me. I think buffer is
capable of about 9 raw pictures and in action shooting (taking multiple
frames 3 per sec) the buffer fills up easily. For occational burst here
and there it won't fill up even with raw.

Buffer helps a lot and if you shoot at more than about 1,5 frames/sec
(for average 14 shots) it will get full, if not it won't and you'll gain
nothing with a faster card.
--
Harri
  #6  
Old June 13th 05, 01:17 PM
Steve Cutchen
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , Harri
Suomalainen wrote:

Lee wrote:
I scraped to get a Rebel XT. As a consequence, I can't really cough up
the $200 for a fast CF card. It means older, cheaper CF memory for me.

It got me thinking- will I ever notice? Now that the Rebel XT can
buffer up 14 frames, I wondering how often I would shoot more then 14
before the camera had a chance to write them to CF. Is this logic right?


The shooting style and subjects matter. If you shoot eg. action photos
you'll need probably all the speed you can get. If you're into
landscapes I doupt you'll ever have the buffer full situation.

The speed shows up in how quickly the pictures are stored once the
buffer is full. Faster with a faster card. It shows up in how quickly
you can copy the card to a computer too (a minor advantage I think). For
most situations it won't show up for me.

I've got a Kingston Elite Pro (1Gb around $100 or so). It is fast enough
that the buffer never fills up if I'm shooting jpegs, once tried about
50 shots and thought that's enough for most situations


I have that card as well. I was surprised to see it was middle of the
pack as far as speed in a 300D is concerned.

http://www.robgalbraith.com/bins/mul...?cid=6007-7699
  #7  
Old June 13th 05, 06:51 PM
Paul Furman
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Harri Suomalainen wrote:

The speed shows up in how quickly the pictures are stored once the
buffer is full. Faster with a faster card. It shows up in how quickly
you can copy the card to a computer too (a minor advantage I think). For
most situations it won't show up for me.

I've got a Kingston Elite Pro (1Gb around $100 or so). It is fast enough
that the buffer never fills up if I'm shooting jpegs, once tried about
50 shots and thought that's enough for most situations


I just got a Sandisk 40x card for my D70. My old microdrive only allowed
a three frame burst with raw + jpeg, now I can do 4 frames. I use it
when trying to catch a bee in flight (for instance). Check you camera's
write speed & get something that matches that. Anything more helps with
downloading to the computer which took about 20 minutes for my 2GB
microdrive. The new 40x card downloaded 100MB in 2 minutes. I haven't
figured what those work out to in MB/second but at least I'm meeting the
camera's specs now.



It does fill up with raw but very rarely for me. I think buffer is
capable of about 9 raw pictures and in action shooting (taking multiple
frames 3 per sec) the buffer fills up easily. For occational burst here
and there it won't fill up even with raw.

Buffer helps a lot and if you shoot at more than about 1,5 frames/sec
(for average 14 shots) it will get full, if not it won't and you'll gain
nothing with a faster card.
--
Harri


--
Paul Furman
http://www.edgehill.net/1
san francisco native plants
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
5 Things You Need to Know About Shutter Speed [email protected] Digital Photography 0 December 26th 04 04:25 PM
Slow Speed Film Review ( from CTEIN 2001 ) DColucci 35mm Photo Equipment 1 December 9th 04 06:24 PM
Toe speed of TMAX 400 (was fridge and heat problems) Richard Knoppow In The Darkroom 192 September 14th 04 01:59 AM
Name of photographer who used slow slit shutter? Daniel Kelly \(AKA Jack\) Other Photographic Equipment 12 April 10th 04 05:08 AM
Name of photographer who used slow slit shutter? Daniel Kelly \(AKA Jack\) General Photography Techniques 6 April 6th 04 01:55 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.