Substitute for Tech Pan?

(Uranium Committee) wrote in message . com...
(Plutonium Committee) wrote in message . com...
(Uranium Committee) wrote in message . com...
Would this work?

http://www.kodak.com/US/en/motion/pr....4.6.6.8&lc=en

Motion Picture film. Are you or are you not the total dumb **** that
spewed mega amounts of **** all over someone else for experimenting
with motion picture film?

Yes, but that was COLOR FILM, you ****wit! Motion Picture color films
take a different process and have incompatible masks and anti-halation
backings, you dumbass. B&W Motion Picture films do not have these
problems, ****face.



And I quote:

"Use conventional film and quite farting around with this ****.
Cimenmatographers are even stupider than still photographers. Moron."

Makes you a moron as well! No wonder your wife left you for that
little spanish girl. ****, you even made her swap over to be a dyke!
I just have two questions for you Asslicker. Was sex with the waffle
boy really the best you ever had, and did you really need to put syrup
on it?

And I repeat, as I am talking to a complete ****ing stupid asshole
moron:

GO THE **** AWAY YOU TOTAL DIP****!!!

You are so ****ing stupid you can't even spell cinematographer. What
you spelled must make hot cross buns at the mall...

Die you scum licking putrid *******. Your mama should let daddy ****
her in the ass the night you were conceived. Oh, sorry, she did...

Plutonium Committee wrote:

snip

Please stop feeding the troll.
--




Keep working millions on welfare depend on you
-------------------

Plutonium Committee wrote:

snip

Please stop feeding the troll.
--




Keep working millions on welfare depend on you
-------------------

On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 13:20:47 -0500, Frank Pittel
wrote:

Please stop feeding the troll.

Yep. http://www.forteinc.com/main/homepage.php

Regards,

John S. Douglas, Photographer - http://www.puresilver.org
Vote "No! for the status quo. Vote 3rd party !!

On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 13:20:47 -0500, Frank Pittel
wrote:

Please stop feeding the troll.

Yep. http://www.forteinc.com/main/homepage.php

Regards,

John S. Douglas, Photographer - http://www.puresilver.org
Vote "No! for the status quo. Vote 3rd party !!

Hemi4268 wrote:

Hi

Originally Tech Pan replaced 5469 High Contrast Copy film sometime in the early
80's. It was really not a replacement since HCC had about 25% more resolution.
Kodak felt that the 100% more speed of TP was more important then 25% less
resolution of HCC.

Anyway, Kodak still made 5460 AHU Microfilm whick was almost identical to 5469
HCC. But unlike HCC, it only came in 100 ft 35mm rolls and 20 rolls was the
minimum order at $8 a roll in 1985.

Not sure if 5460 is still being made. Banks mostly used it to copy checks. It
was also the main film for microfish,

Larry

The only Kodak microfilms I've seen on their site are Imagelink family
-- HQ, high resolution, FS, high speed, and a selection of silver and
azo negative and positive copy films.

However, I did see a High Contrast Copy Film in the movie film section
of their site today, following that link posted by the troll. Don't
recall the emulsion designation, but yet, it looks like it might be a
replacement for TP if Imagelink isn't suitable (and Imagelink doesn't
come in either 35 mm or fiche, AFAIK).

--
The challenge to the photographer is to command the medium, to use
whatever current equipment and technology furthers his creative
objectives, without sacrificing the ability to make his own decisions.
-- Ansel Adams

Donald Qualls, aka The Silent Observer http://silent1.home.netcom.com

Opinions expressed are my own -- take them for what they're worth
and don't expect them to be perfect.

Hemi4268 wrote:

Hi

Originally Tech Pan replaced 5469 High Contrast Copy film sometime in the early
80's. It was really not a replacement since HCC had about 25% more resolution.
Kodak felt that the 100% more speed of TP was more important then 25% less
resolution of HCC.

Anyway, Kodak still made 5460 AHU Microfilm whick was almost identical to 5469
HCC. But unlike HCC, it only came in 100 ft 35mm rolls and 20 rolls was the
minimum order at $8 a roll in 1985.

Not sure if 5460 is still being made. Banks mostly used it to copy checks. It
was also the main film for microfish,

Larry

The only Kodak microfilms I've seen on their site are Imagelink family
-- HQ, high resolution, FS, high speed, and a selection of silver and
azo negative and positive copy films.

However, I did see a High Contrast Copy Film in the movie film section
of their site today, following that link posted by the troll. Don't
recall the emulsion designation, but yet, it looks like it might be a
replacement for TP if Imagelink isn't suitable (and Imagelink doesn't
come in either 35 mm or fiche, AFAIK).

--
The challenge to the photographer is to command the medium, to use
whatever current equipment and technology furthers his creative
objectives, without sacrificing the ability to make his own decisions.
-- Ansel Adams

Donald Qualls, aka The Silent Observer http://silent1.home.netcom.com

Opinions expressed are my own -- take them for what they're worth
and don't expect them to be perfect.

Plutonium Committee wrote:

competition for the other troll

Plonk!

--
The challenge to the photographer is to command the medium, to use
whatever current equipment and technology furthers his creative
objectives, without sacrificing the ability to make his own decisions.
-- Ansel Adams

Donald Qualls, aka The Silent Observer http://silent1.home.netcom.com

Opinions expressed are my own -- take them for what they're worth
and don't expect them to be perfect.

Plutonium Committee wrote:

competition for the other troll

Plonk!

--
The challenge to the photographer is to command the medium, to use
whatever current equipment and technology furthers his creative
objectives, without sacrificing the ability to make his own decisions.
-- Ansel Adams

Donald Qualls, aka The Silent Observer http://silent1.home.netcom.com

Opinions expressed are my own -- take them for what they're worth
and don't expect them to be perfect.

John wrote:

On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 13:20:47 -0500, Frank Pittel
wrote:


Please stop feeding the troll.


Yep. http://www.forteinc.com/main/homepage.php


Actually, John, I like Netscape -- it's had a good kill filter since
1996, about, except for a brief period after the jump to version 6.0.

--
The challenge to the photographer is to command the medium, to use
whatever current equipment and technology furthers his creative
objectives, without sacrificing the ability to make his own decisions.
-- Ansel Adams

Donald Qualls, aka The Silent Observer http://silent1.home.netcom.com

Opinions expressed are my own -- take them for what they're worth
and don't expect them to be perfect.