A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Digital Photography » Digital Photography
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Rich's reviews "Highly Questionable" is highly questionable



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 30th 09, 02:22 PM posted to rec.photo.digital.slr-systems,rec.photo.digital
Pete Stavrakoglou
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 498
Default Rich's reviews "Highly Questionable" is highly questionable

...."relative to others." What "others" are there? You can't compare the
D300 to the EP-1. Compare the EP-1 to other like cameras.

"Rich" wrote in message
...
On Jul 29, 11:05 pm, (Ray Fischer) wrote:
RichA wrote:
Both cameras got "highly recommended." Evidently, it's a highly
flexible attribution.


We'll be looking forward to your detailed review that justifies your
slander.

--
Ray Fischer


IQ letting you down again? The problem wasn't the review, it was the
scoring of the review relative to others. Try to keep up.


  #2  
Old July 30th 09, 03:12 PM posted to rec.photo.digital.slr-systems,rec.photo.digital
George Kerby
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,798
Default Rich's reviews "Highly Questionable" is highly questionable




On 7/30/09 8:22 AM, in article ,
"Pete Stavrakoglou" wrote:

..."relative to others." What "others" are there? You can't compare the

D300 to the EP-1. Compare the EP-1 to other like cameras.

"Rich" wrote in message
...
On Jul 29, 11:05 pm, (Ray Fischer) wrote:
RichA wrote:
Both cameras got "highly recommended." Evidently, it's a highly
flexible attribution.


We'll be looking forward to your detailed review that justifies your
slander.

--
Ray Fischer


IQ letting you down again? The problem wasn't the review, it was the
scoring of the review relative to others. Try to keep up.


Tough to do when one has a double digit IQ...

  #3  
Old July 30th 09, 06:27 PM posted to rec.photo.digital.slr-systems,rec.photo.digital
Ray Fischer
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5,136
Default Rich's reviews "Highly Questionable" is highly questionable

Pete Stavrakoglou wrote:
"Rich" wrote in message
On Jul 29, 11:05 pm, (Ray Fischer) wrote:
RichA wrote:
Both cameras got "highly recommended." Evidently, it's a highly
flexible attribution.


We'll be looking forward to your detailed review that justifies your
slander.


IQ letting you down again? The problem wasn't the review, it was the
scoring of the review relative to others. Try to keep up.


The scoring s part of the review, dimwit.

--
Ray Fischer


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Rich's reviews "Highly Questionable" is highly questionable Ray Fischer Digital SLR Cameras 16 August 14th 09 02:45 AM
Rich's reviews "Highly Questionable" is highly questionable Ray Fischer Digital Photography 10 August 14th 09 02:45 AM
Dpreview's reviews "Highly Recommended" is highly questionable The pixel Bandit Digital Photography 1 July 30th 09 06:24 AM
Dpreview's reviews "Highly Recommended" is highly questionable The pixel Bandit Digital SLR Cameras 2 July 30th 09 06:24 AM
Poor Pentax K10D. Just manages a "highly recommended" on dpreview RichA Digital SLR Cameras 24 December 21st 06 02:34 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.