If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
ABC ABC asks:
Rough guess: it is plenty far off if you want a real SLR. A good camera otherwise, it does not, and cannot, do what an SLR does for many of us. What about the prosumer grade and amatuers' fun camera? Even for the SLR, we also have Kodak, fuji , Sigma. Yeah, but the two main pro systems for many years have been Canon & Nikon. The competition has always, or nearly always, been between those two. I used Olympus and Minolta (manual focus for both) until recently for all my work, but I originally started with a Canon F1 back around, IIRC, '70 or '71. Lost that in an uninsured fire, so went to Olympus. Anyway, there will be more DSLRs come October...Olympus is already out there, and will have another, I'd guess, as will Pentax, while Minolta may also get its tootsies wet. But I'll guess that once it all settles down, the arguments about which are best will still be mostly based on Canon vs. Nikon. More of them out there, for one thing. If people who use "prosumer" (what a ****ty word) cameras and 'stop and pop' cameras want representation on here, I think they'd better get to it. Post. I doubt much of the point and shoot crowd will, though. Too likely to get buried in the technical detail, which is more likely bore you to death instead of teaching you anything really valuable if all you know about your camera is where the on switch is, and what kind of batteries it takes. Charlie Self "A judge is a law student who marks his own examination papers." H. L. Mencken |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
ABC ABC asks:
Rough guess: it is plenty far off if you want a real SLR. A good camera otherwise, it does not, and cannot, do what an SLR does for many of us. What about the prosumer grade and amatuers' fun camera? Even for the SLR, we also have Kodak, fuji , Sigma. Yeah, but the two main pro systems for many years have been Canon & Nikon. The competition has always, or nearly always, been between those two. I used Olympus and Minolta (manual focus for both) until recently for all my work, but I originally started with a Canon F1 back around, IIRC, '70 or '71. Lost that in an uninsured fire, so went to Olympus. Anyway, there will be more DSLRs come October...Olympus is already out there, and will have another, I'd guess, as will Pentax, while Minolta may also get its tootsies wet. But I'll guess that once it all settles down, the arguments about which are best will still be mostly based on Canon vs. Nikon. More of them out there, for one thing. If people who use "prosumer" (what a ****ty word) cameras and 'stop and pop' cameras want representation on here, I think they'd better get to it. Post. I doubt much of the point and shoot crowd will, though. Too likely to get buried in the technical detail, which is more likely bore you to death instead of teaching you anything really valuable if all you know about your camera is where the on switch is, and what kind of batteries it takes. Charlie Self "A judge is a law student who marks his own examination papers." H. L. Mencken |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Besides what was said I think most people looking to invest in a high-ish
end digital camera want to stick with a company that has a long history of building cameras. That is companies like Nikon and Canon and even Olympus (even though they seem to be falling behind). Panasonic on the other hand is a recent entry in to cameras at least when compared to others. This is just a guess and it is based on how I feel about it as well. John "ABC" wrote in message ... I roughly counted the topic of the threads in the NG. I would say about 95% goes to Nikon and Canon. Just for example, I have been looking at Panasonic. It is not that far off in terms of performance and price. A few other brands seem not bad too. Why is this? Any clue? ABC Do not reply by email. -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Besides what was said I think most people looking to invest in a high-ish
end digital camera want to stick with a company that has a long history of building cameras. That is companies like Nikon and Canon and even Olympus (even though they seem to be falling behind). Panasonic on the other hand is a recent entry in to cameras at least when compared to others. This is just a guess and it is based on how I feel about it as well. John "ABC" wrote in message ... I roughly counted the topic of the threads in the NG. I would say about 95% goes to Nikon and Canon. Just for example, I have been looking at Panasonic. It is not that far off in terms of performance and price. A few other brands seem not bad too. Why is this? Any clue? ABC Do not reply by email. -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
ABC wrote in news:ljaui0p2bpvkv2mbbtap3jmnu0st9vvs8r@
4ax.com: I roughly counted the topic of the threads in the NG. I would say about 95% goes to Nikon and Canon. Just for example, I have been looking at Panasonic. It is not that far off in terms of performance and price. A few other brands seem not bad too. Why is this? Any clue? Most talk here is about DSLR. Panasonic has none. I would guess that Nikon and Canon has a very large percentage of the sales. You forgot Sigma - lots of talk about Sigma here. You could ask why so few Pentax and Fuji. Maybe by far too few users? If you caount the posters her - it is not so many regular posters really. So - maybe it is just a matter of probability. Then - there is also a critical mass. You cannot talk about Panasonic alone, even if you are some few not everyone will respond. Cameras with more users tend to create more replies. So - the more popular cameras will stay and the others go elsewhere - to some Panasonic web forum maybe? Here is one http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/forum.asp?forum=1033 Looks to be quite frequent - 92 posts during the last hour. /Roland |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
ABC wrote in news:ljaui0p2bpvkv2mbbtap3jmnu0st9vvs8r@
4ax.com: I roughly counted the topic of the threads in the NG. I would say about 95% goes to Nikon and Canon. Just for example, I have been looking at Panasonic. It is not that far off in terms of performance and price. A few other brands seem not bad too. Why is this? Any clue? Most talk here is about DSLR. Panasonic has none. I would guess that Nikon and Canon has a very large percentage of the sales. You forgot Sigma - lots of talk about Sigma here. You could ask why so few Pentax and Fuji. Maybe by far too few users? If you caount the posters her - it is not so many regular posters really. So - maybe it is just a matter of probability. Then - there is also a critical mass. You cannot talk about Panasonic alone, even if you are some few not everyone will respond. Cameras with more users tend to create more replies. So - the more popular cameras will stay and the others go elsewhere - to some Panasonic web forum maybe? Here is one http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/forum.asp?forum=1033 Looks to be quite frequent - 92 posts during the last hour. /Roland |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
ABC wrote in news:ljaui0p2bpvkv2mbbtap3jmnu0st9vvs8r@
4ax.com: I roughly counted the topic of the threads in the NG. I would say about 95% goes to Nikon and Canon. Just for example, I have been looking at Panasonic. It is not that far off in terms of performance and price. A few other brands seem not bad too. Why is this? Any clue? Most talk here is about DSLR. Panasonic has none. I would guess that Nikon and Canon has a very large percentage of the sales. You forgot Sigma - lots of talk about Sigma here. You could ask why so few Pentax and Fuji. Maybe by far too few users? If you caount the posters her - it is not so many regular posters really. So - maybe it is just a matter of probability. Then - there is also a critical mass. You cannot talk about Panasonic alone, even if you are some few not everyone will respond. Cameras with more users tend to create more replies. So - the more popular cameras will stay and the others go elsewhere - to some Panasonic web forum maybe? Here is one http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/forum.asp?forum=1033 Looks to be quite frequent - 92 posts during the last hour. /Roland |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 13:30:37 GMT, "Justin Thyme"
wrote: "Charlie Self" wrote in message ... Maybe I should complain. My Pentax *istD gets very little attention either, even though it is an SLR. Maybe it is because Canon and Nikon owners have to keep reassuring themselves that they did make the right decision, hence they have to keep saying how much better they are than the other. So while all the Canon & Nikon owners are arguing between each other like a couple of schoolkids arguing who has the toughest dad, pentax/minolta/olympus/etc owners can quietly go about our business of taking photographs. Yes, I'm sure that's it. Bill Funk Change "g" to "a" |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 13:30:37 GMT, "Justin Thyme"
wrote: "Charlie Self" wrote in message ... Maybe I should complain. My Pentax *istD gets very little attention either, even though it is an SLR. Maybe it is because Canon and Nikon owners have to keep reassuring themselves that they did make the right decision, hence they have to keep saying how much better they are than the other. So while all the Canon & Nikon owners are arguing between each other like a couple of schoolkids arguing who has the toughest dad, pentax/minolta/olympus/etc owners can quietly go about our business of taking photographs. Yes, I'm sure that's it. Bill Funk Change "g" to "a" |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 13:30:37 GMT, "Justin Thyme"
wrote: "Charlie Self" wrote in message ... Maybe I should complain. My Pentax *istD gets very little attention either, even though it is an SLR. Maybe it is because Canon and Nikon owners have to keep reassuring themselves that they did make the right decision, hence they have to keep saying how much better they are than the other. So while all the Canon & Nikon owners are arguing between each other like a couple of schoolkids arguing who has the toughest dad, pentax/minolta/olympus/etc owners can quietly go about our business of taking photographs. Yes, I'm sure that's it. Bill Funk Change "g" to "a" |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
CANON - The Great Innovator (was: CANON – The Great Pretender) | Steven M. Scharf | Digital Photography | 104 | September 3rd 04 01:01 PM |
CANON - The Great Innovator (was: CANON – The Great Pretender) | Steven M. Scharf | 35mm Photo Equipment | 92 | September 3rd 04 01:01 PM |
Nikon 3700 or Canon A75 | Christopher Muto | Digital Photography | 18 | August 22nd 04 11:56 AM |