Pixel 2 dethrones iPhone 8 Plus and Galaxy Note 8 in camera rankings

He who is Snit said on Thu, 05 Oct 2017 08:40:16 -0700:

And keep in mind his own sources refuted his claims.

Why you just make this stuff up is beyond comprehension.

I reported fact and nobody can dispute (because it's fact) that iOS mobile
phones typically fared on the bottom of the top ten to top dozen of all
mobile phones when it came to historic DXOmark scores in the past.

You can dispute that fact, but we published the actual scores multiple
times at the times they were published, and they show exactly what I said
is fact and that which nobody here disputed at the time (because it was
fact). They even discussed the relative rankings in depth.

So only you seem to dispute facts.

In this thread, I reported faithfully what an article says, which, again,
only you seem to dispute as a fact.

It appears that when you don't like the fact that the "Pixel 2 dethroned
iPhone 8 Plus and Galaxy Note 8 in DXOMark's recent camera rankings", you
claim that this fact isn't a fact.

I hope to Dear God that you don't vote because your own words show that you
can't seem to comprehend fact that nobody else disputes (because it is fact
all that I say in this thread).

That you, as an iOS apologist, don't like facts, doesn't change that
they're facts nonetheless.

He who is nospam said on Thu, 05 Oct 2017 09:49:23 -0400:

one of the most comprehensive camera review sites, both for traditional
cameras and now smartphones, is dpreview.com.

some of their reviews are 20-30 *pages* long and take as much as 6-8
weeks to complete.

That trick will easily work on people like Snit who are unable to
comprehend facts; but it won't work on people as intelligent as you are,
and who are on to your tricks.

In fact, we all know enough about you, nospam, to carefully vet what you
actually say versus what you're intending to imply, because you, like James
Comey, always seem to cleverly cloud the truth with duplicitous intent.

Given your well-known mendacity, what's completely different (and more
sinister) about you from the average iOS apologist, nospam, is that you're
actually intelligent, and, as I said many times, you distort truth rather
cleverly (as you did just now) such that your true calling may be that you
should be a lawyer or politician.

Unlike the average iOS apologists who posts drivel to Usenet (e.g., Lewis,
Jolly Roger, , etc.), you can actually handle the nuances of
detail, which is why your clever distortions easily fool the hoi polloi.

While DPReview *does* review smartphones
https://www.dpreview.com/reviews?category=mobilephones

And while you *can* get an order by ranking:
https://www.dpreview.com/reviews?cat...es&sort=rating

Not only is the *best* Apple phone on that list in 11th place, but the
entire list is only of fewer than 50 phones, which doesn't qualify as an
answer to the question, despite your attempt to make it so.

Back to the point, which is that it's a valid concern that the DXOMark
tests scores may not be the best out there to rank all smartphones - but
then - if you want to make that point - you have to find something that we
can all rely upon that is better.

Here are the current rankings, which Snit will likely dispute simply
because he has done so repeatedly in the past, where the best iPhone is
11th on that list (which is historically a typical ranking for iPhones).

89% Nokia 808 Pureview Review (Oct 9, 2012)
88% Nokia Lumia 1020 Review (Aug 30, 2013)
88% Nokia Lumia 1020 Review (Jul 24, 2013)
86% Panasonic Lumix DMC-CM1 Review (May 27, 2015)
85% HTC 10 Review (Jun 17, 2016)
84% Huawei P9 Review (Jul 22, 2016)
84% LG G5 Review (May 6, 2016)
84% Sony Xperia Z5 Review (Feb 9, 2016)
84% Nokia Lumia 1520 Review (Feb 7, 2014)
83% Motorola Droid Turbo 2 / Motorola Moto X Force Review (Jun 2, 2016)
83% Apple iPhone 6s Plus Review (Dec 1, 2015)
83% Motorola Droid Turbo 2 / Motorola Moto X Force Preview (Oct 27, 2015)
83% Samsung Galaxy Note 4 Review (Apr 13, 2015)
82% Motorola Moto X Style / Motorola Moto X Pure Edition Review (Oct 1, 2015)
82% Motorola Moto X Style / Motorola Moto X Pure Edition Review (Jul 28, 2015)
82% Motorola Moto X Style / Motorola Moto X Pure Edition Review (Jul 28, 2015)
82% LG G4 Review (Jul 17, 2015)
82% Google Nexus 6 Review (Jan 27, 2015)
82% Google Nexus 6 Review (Nov 22, 2014)
82% Apple iPhone 6 Plus Review (Oct 21, 2014)
82% Samsung Galaxy S5 Review (Jul 9, 2014)
81% Apple iPhone 5s Review (Oct 3, 2013)
80% Motorola Moto X (2014) Review (Dec 18, 2014)
80% Samsung Galaxy S4 Review (Jul 12, 2013)
80% Samsung Galaxy S4 Review (Mar 15, 2013)
80% Apple iPhone 5 Review (Oct 9, 2012)
79% Amazon Fire Phone Review (Sep 28, 2014)
78% Sony Xperia Z1 Review (Nov 1, 2013)
78% Sony Xperia Z1 Review (Sep 9, 2013)
76% Huawei Mate S Review (Apr 7, 2016)
76% Sony Xperia Z2 Review (Aug 19, 2014)
76% Sony Xperia Z2 Review (Apr 7, 2014)
75% HTC One Review (Jun 4, 2013)
75% HTC One X Review (Oct 22, 2012)
74% LG G2 Review (Nov 15, 2013)
73% Sony Xperia Z3 Review (Feb 24, 2015)
73% Sony Xperia Z3 Review (Sep 21, 2014)
73% Samsung Galaxy S III (Galaxy S3) Review (Nov 1, 2012)
71% HTC One M8 Review (May 27, 2014)
71% Google Nexus 5 Review (Nov 29, 2013)
71% Samsung Galaxy Note II Review (Mar 22, 2013)
69% BlackBerry Z10 Review (Apr 19, 2013)
68% HTC Windows Phone 8X Review (Apr 8, 2013)
66% Motorola Moto X Review (Mar 3, 2014)
66% Sony Xperia Z Review (Jun 12, 2013)
66% Sony Xperia Z Review (Apr 19, 2013)
66% Sony Xperia Z Review (Jan 10, 2013)

On 10/5/17, 8:50 AM, in article , "harry newton"
wrote:

He who is Snit said on Thu, 05 Oct 2017 08:40:16 -0700:

And keep in mind his own sources refuted his claims.

Why you just make this stuff up is beyond comprehension.

You posted a link that showed different iPhones in five of the top 10
spots... directly contradicting your own claim.

But you just lie and lie and lie. It is what you do. Here is another
example, when you claimed that there was no way to record Wi-Fi signals in
real time in iOS, and when you insisted there was nothing one can do with
iOS that cannot be done on Android:

https://youtu.be/7QaABa6DFIo

Where is your video? I keep asking and you keep running. And you always
will. Face it -- you were busted lying.

....

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308

He who is nospam said on Thu, 05 Oct 2017 09:49:22 -0400:

because google paid dxo and shipped them pre-release phones that were
tweaked to do well on their benchmarks.

Did Google also pay DPReview who, not only do you bring up as a *better*
test, but who also show, historically, the best iPhone they've tested at
between 10th and 12th place?

On 10/5/17, 9:07 AM, in article , "harry newton"
wrote:

He who is nospam said on Thu, 05 Oct 2017 09:49:23 -0400:

one of the most comprehensive camera review sites, both for traditional
cameras and now smartphones, is dpreview.com.

some of their reviews are 20-30 *pages* long and take as much as 6-8
weeks to complete.

That trick will easily work on people like Snit who are unable to
comprehend facts;

See how you lash out now that I have proved you wrong:

https://youtu.be/7QaABa6DFIo

It is not like it is hard. And, remember, your own source listed different
iPhones as five of the top 10 cameras. You were wrong about that, too.

but it won't work on people as intelligent as you are,
and who are on to your tricks.

The "trick" is to call out your lying and watch you cry.


....


--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308

harry newton:
"Pixel 2..."

This is a claim you made but never supported -- in fact your own links
refuted this claim

The troll has a serious case of Apple envy. Why not just kill-file him.
Otherwise I'll have to kill-file you so that I don't see his posts.

--
I agree with almost everything that you have said and almost everything that
you will say in your entire life.

usenet *at* davidillig dawt cawm

On Oct 5, 2017, Davoud wrote
(in article ):

harry newton:
"Pixel 2..."

This is a claim you made but never supported -- in fact your own links
refuted this claim

The troll has a serious case of Apple envy. Why not just kill-file him.
Otherwise I'll have to kill-file you so that I don't see his posts.

Just kill the thread. You would be pleasantly surprised at how quickly the
S/N ratio is cleaned up.

--

Regards,
Savageduck

On 10/5/17, 10:27 AM, in article , "Davoud"
wrote:

harry newton:
"Pixel 2..."

This is a claim you made but never supported -- in fact your own links
refuted this claim

The troll has a serious case of Apple envy. Why not just kill-file him.
Otherwise I'll have to kill-file you so that I don't see his posts.

I do openly admit I tend to feed trolls. I will feed this one someone less
but not stop... if you feel you serve yourself best by KFing me I am OK with
that and take no offense.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308

On 2017-10-05, Davoud wrote:
harry newton:

This is a claim you made but never supported -- in fact your own
links refuted this claim

The troll has a serious case of Apple envy. Why not just kill-file
him. Otherwise I'll have to kill-file you so that I don't see his
posts.

It's a good idea to kill them both. Snit and his troll followers add
nothing of substance here, and neither does the Apple-envying troll
currently named "harry newton".

--
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR

On 10/5/17, 12:26 PM, in article , "Jolly
Roger" wrote:

On 2017-10-05, Davoud wrote:
harry newton:

This is a claim you made but never supported -- in fact your own
links refuted this claim

The troll has a serious case of Apple envy. Why not just kill-file
him. Otherwise I'll have to kill-file you so that I don't see his
posts.

It's a good idea to kill them both. Snit and his troll followers add
nothing of substance here, and neither does the Apple-envying troll
currently named "harry newton".

Well, recently the "substance" I have been offering is just to show Harry to
be lying... and it is fun for me.

https://youtu.be/7QaABa6DFIo

And his own link, STILL showing 5 of the 10 top cameras are on iPhones:

https://www.dxomark.com/category/mobile-reviews

But, sure, the point that all he can do is run has been proved a dozen+
times over.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308