A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Digital Photography » Digital Photography
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Autostitch question



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 29th 05, 12:35 AM
Bruce W.1
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Autostitch question

I've been reading about Panorama Tools and I decided to give Autostitch
a try:
http://www.autostitch.net/

Rather than working with photographs I scanned a paper map on my
scanner. It consists of 21 JPEG's. Autostitch put them all together
correctly. Amazing! I'm impressed.

Only one thing I can't figure out. The final big JPEG is warped, as if
peeled off of a sphere. I can see where this might be needed with
photographs having lens distortions and all. But I'm working with flat
undistorted scanned images. The end big JPEG should not be warped.

Autostitch has a bunch of stitch option settings, which I don't
understand, settings like Theta, Phi, Psi. Is there a setting that
would prevent or reduce the warping of my flat images?

Thanks for your help.
  #2  
Old March 29th 05, 12:41 AM
Scott W
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I can't speak about autostitch since I don't use it, but many stitching
programs handle the case of scanned images differently then photos and
will give you a very good non-distorted final image. There is a check
box to tell the program that you are stitch from a scanned source.

Scott

  #3  
Old March 29th 05, 12:41 AM
Scott W
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I can't speak about autostitch since I don't use it, but many stitching
programs handle the case of scanned images differently then photos and
will give you a very good non-distorted final image. There is a check
box to tell the program that you are stitch from a scanned source.

Scott

  #4  
Old March 29th 05, 06:00 PM
Bruce W.1
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Scott W wrote:
I can't speak about autostitch since I don't use it, but many stitching
programs handle the case of scanned images differently then photos and
will give you a very good non-distorted final image. There is a check
box to tell the program that you are stitch from a scanned source.

Scott

==========================================

Got any program recommendations?

Every other program I've tried so far barfs. My scanned images are all
different sizes and have different quantities of images in each row. In
other words my source image is not rectangular.

The Panorama Tools can do this, sort of, but with great effort. It's
easier to do it manually in a graphics program:
http://hugin.sourceforge.net/tutorials/scans/en.shtml
  #5  
Old March 29th 05, 06:00 PM
Bruce W.1
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Scott W wrote:
I can't speak about autostitch since I don't use it, but many stitching
programs handle the case of scanned images differently then photos and
will give you a very good non-distorted final image. There is a check
box to tell the program that you are stitch from a scanned source.

Scott

==========================================

Got any program recommendations?

Every other program I've tried so far barfs. My scanned images are all
different sizes and have different quantities of images in each row. In
other words my source image is not rectangular.

The Panorama Tools can do this, sort of, but with great effort. It's
easier to do it manually in a graphics program:
http://hugin.sourceforge.net/tutorials/scans/en.shtml
  #6  
Old March 29th 05, 10:47 PM
meow
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I got photostich with my first Canon digital camera. It comes with all Canon
cameras. However I don't believe you can buy it. You may have to borrow
someone's canon install cd. You don't need a Canon camera to use it.
It has a selection for scanned in objects. I used it to put together a map
also. It was about 16 pieces. Worked great.
http://web.canon.jp/Imaging/SDK/PS-e.html

"Bruce W.1" wrote in message
. com...
Scott W wrote:
I can't speak about autostitch since I don't use it, but many stitching
programs handle the case of scanned images differently then photos and
will give you a very good non-distorted final image. There is a check
box to tell the program that you are stitch from a scanned source.

Scott

==========================================

Got any program recommendations?

Every other program I've tried so far barfs. My scanned images are all
different sizes and have different quantities of images in each row. In
other words my source image is not rectangular.

The Panorama Tools can do this, sort of, but with great effort. It's
easier to do it manually in a graphics program:
http://hugin.sourceforge.net/tutorials/scans/en.shtml



  #7  
Old March 29th 05, 11:10 PM
Paul Mitchum
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Bruce W.1 wrote:

I've been reading about Panorama Tools and I decided to give Autostitch
a try:
http://www.autostitch.net/

Rather than working with photographs I scanned a paper map on my
scanner. It consists of 21 JPEG's. Autostitch put them all together
correctly. Amazing! I'm impressed.

Only one thing I can't figure out. The final big JPEG is warped, as if
peeled off of a sphere. I can see where this might be needed with
photographs having lens distortions and all. But I'm working with flat
undistorted scanned images. The end big JPEG should not be warped.

Autostitch has a bunch of stitch option settings, which I don't
understand, settings like Theta, Phi, Psi. Is there a setting that
would prevent or reduce the warping of my flat images?


You want the planar projection instead of the spherical one.

However, from the web site:

Q: What projection method does AutoStitch use? Does it support full view
panoramas?

A:The demo version of AutoStitch uses sperical projection and is capable
of stitching full view 360 x 180 degree panoramas (everything visible
from a point). Cylindrical and planar projections are not supported in
the demo version.


You might try Hugin:
http://hugin.sourceforge.net/tutorials/scans/en.shtml
  #8  
Old March 29th 05, 11:10 PM
Paul Mitchum
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Bruce W.1 wrote:

I've been reading about Panorama Tools and I decided to give Autostitch
a try:
http://www.autostitch.net/

Rather than working with photographs I scanned a paper map on my
scanner. It consists of 21 JPEG's. Autostitch put them all together
correctly. Amazing! I'm impressed.

Only one thing I can't figure out. The final big JPEG is warped, as if
peeled off of a sphere. I can see where this might be needed with
photographs having lens distortions and all. But I'm working with flat
undistorted scanned images. The end big JPEG should not be warped.

Autostitch has a bunch of stitch option settings, which I don't
understand, settings like Theta, Phi, Psi. Is there a setting that
would prevent or reduce the warping of my flat images?


You want the planar projection instead of the spherical one.

However, from the web site:

Q: What projection method does AutoStitch use? Does it support full view
panoramas?

A:The demo version of AutoStitch uses sperical projection and is capable
of stitching full view 360 x 180 degree panoramas (everything visible
from a point). Cylindrical and planar projections are not supported in
the demo version.


You might try Hugin:
http://hugin.sourceforge.net/tutorials/scans/en.shtml
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AutoStitch Steve Wolfe Digital Photography 8 March 19th 05 11:32 PM
Question about Photo printers John Digital Photography 35 December 24th 04 02:30 AM
Westward Facing Overlook Question Ray Creveling Photographing Nature 7 August 26th 04 04:52 AM
A stupid question MrAVenez Digital Photography 20 August 15th 04 06:21 AM
top posting - a genuine question Orville Wright 35mm Photo Equipment 22 July 25th 04 12:26 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.