Mountain Fun-Guy

"DanP" wrote in message
...
On Aug 2, 1:51 pm, "N" wrote:
"LOL!" wrote in message

...





On Mon, 2 Aug 2010 22:19:27 +1000, "N" wrote:

"Ofnuts" wrote in message
...
On 02/08/2010 12:17, N wrote:

"Ofnuts" wrote in message
. ..
On 01/08/2010 19:16, LOL! wrote:

Of course not... they are posted so that we can't identify the
owning
flickr account. You post the URL, but nothing says the URL belongs
to
any of your multiple noms de trolling.

You don't know much about Flickr.

... but I'm willling to learn. How do you do it?

--
Bertrand

Do you really want a lesson on Flickr embedded in this thread?

Why not?

You lousy, useless, desperate for attention, pretend-photographer
trolls
have already hijacked this thread about photographic practices for
nature
photography with every other useless non-photography topic under the
sun.
Why not another topic?

It's far too late to back-peddle now to try to make yourselves out to
be
anything less than useless thread-hijacking trolls.

Do continue.

LOL!

I'm not sure if ofnuts wants a lesson the Flickr generally, or a lesson
on
using the API. Both are easily found with a search engine.

--
N

There is a way to put a photo on Flickr anonymously.
Upload it, have it private, view it, click on "Share this", "Grab
HTML" and copy the address.

Try find who posted this:
http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4114/...331a26c1_b.jpg

This is what the troll does and after a while he deletes it. Genius.
I feel guilty for wasting my wasting time with this.


DanP

You don't know much about the Flickr API.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/danpetre/4854148426/


--
N

On Mon, 2 Aug 2010 16:28:34 -0700 (PDT), DanP wrote:

On Aug 2, 10:10*pm, "N" wrote:
"DanP" wrote in message

...





On Aug 2, 1:51 pm, "N" wrote:
"LOL!" wrote in message

. ..

On Mon, 2 Aug 2010 22:19:27 +1000, "N" wrote:

"Ofnuts" wrote in message
...
On 02/08/2010 12:17, N wrote:

"Ofnuts" wrote in message
. ..
On 01/08/2010 19:16, LOL! wrote:

Of course not... they are posted so that we can't identify the
owning
flickr account. You post the URL, but nothing says the URL belongs
to
any of your multiple noms de trolling.

You don't know much about Flickr.

... but I'm willling to learn. How do you do it?

--
Bertrand

Do you really want a lesson on Flickr embedded in this thread?

Why not?

You lousy, useless, desperate for attention, pretend-photographer
trolls
have already hijacked this thread about photographic practices for
nature
photography with every other useless non-photography topic under the
sun.
Why not another topic?

It's far too late to back-peddle now to try to make yourselves out to
be
anything less than useless thread-hijacking trolls.

Do continue.

LOL!

I'm not sure if ofnuts wants a lesson the Flickr generally, or a lesson
on
using the API. *Both are easily found with a search engine.

--
N

There is a way to put a photo on Flickr anonymously.
Upload it, have it private, view it, click on "Share this", "Grab
HTML" and copy the address.

Try find who posted this:
http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4114/...331a26c1_b.jpg

This is what the troll does and after a while he deletes it. Genius.
I feel guilty for wasting my wasting time with this.

DanP

You don't know much about the Flickr API.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/danpetre/4854148426/


No.

DanP

You don't know much about cameras and photography either. You still can't
even figure out what an aperture setting is for yet nor why they do what
they do. Photography-101.

LOL!

"Bruce" wrote in message
...
[]
I'll tell you what's laughable, David. It's you trying to sound
authoritative about equipment you know less than nothing about.

Nonsense.

Now that's really funny. ;-)

But what is funnier is you accusing others of trolling, especially
when they are merely questioning your choice of equipment. In other
words, according to you, anyone who questions your choices is a troll.
Now that's just hilarious! LOL!

More nonsense.

Anyone who reads my posts will know what you say is completely untrue.

David

"Bruce" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 2 Aug 2010 19:14:45 +0100, "David J Taylor"
wrote:

"Bruce" wrote in message
. ..
[]
No David, like so many others on here, you are here to justify your
own buying decisions, and to seek entertainment by participating in
discussions about equipment you have never used, and most probably
never will.

That's a factual comment based on your postings. If you choose to
take it as a personal insult, that is entirely up to you. If it
upsets you, there is always your kill file.

So no-one is allowed to discuss or ask questions about equipment they
don't own? Laughable!


I'll tell you what's laughable, David. It's you trying to sound
authoritative about equipment you know less than nothing about.

Now that's really funny. ;-)

But what is funnier is you accusing others of trolling, especially
when they are merely questioning your choice of equipment. In other
words, according to you, anyone who questions your choices is a troll.
Now that's just hilarious! LOL!




What is really strange is you complaining about someone posting without
knowing hat they are talking about.
Pots & kettles.
--
Peter

Bruce wrote:


So no-one is allowed to discuss or ask questions about equipment they
don't own? Laughable!


I'll tell you what's laughable, David. It's you trying to sound
authoritative about equipment you know less than nothing about.

Now that's really funny. ;-)

What is even funnier still is seeing you Bruce/Tony jump into bed with the
real troll. Though it all makes perfect sense as you've never posted any
proof of your supposed talent either.

But what is funnier is you accusing others of trolling, especially
when they are merely questioning your choice of equipment. In other
words, according to you, anyone who questions your choices is a troll.
Now that's just hilarious! LOL!

There you are see, you even sound just like him too.

--
sid