A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » General Photography » In The Darkroom
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

B&W film question



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old October 13th 04, 02:35 PM
Uranium Committee
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Frank Pittel wrote in message ...
Uranium Committee wrote:
: "Reany" wrote in message ...
: My darkroom has been packed away for many years. I'm setting it back up
: again and I want advice on film. I used to use Kodak panatomic-x. What
: film would you recommend as a substitute?
:
: Thanks
: Gary

: Several good choices:

: Ilford Pan-F Plus, ISO 50. Try it in Paterson Acutol 1+19 for 8
: minutes @ 20C/68F.

A very good film but with the financialSP? issues that Ilford is having
it may not last long even if Ilford survives.

: Fotokemika KB 25 (same as the former Adox KB14). Very contrasty. Try
: it in Paterson Acutol 1+22 for 7,5 minutes @ 20C/68F.

I've met people that like it a lot but have never had any luck with it.

: Ilford Delta 100. Try it in Paterson FX-39 1+19 for 7,5 minutes @
: 20C/68F. This would be my choice.

I spent a lot of time using Delta-100 this spring and like it a lot. I
developed it with Iloford's DDX developer diluted 1:9 at 75F. Great tonality
very good shadow detail and highlights that didn't block up.

: Kodak T-Max 100 is also supposed to be good, but I don't like it.

My personal opinion of Tmax-100 is that it's finest B&W film on the market.
For sheet film I develop it with Tmax-RS at 75F diluted 1:9 and for roll
film I develop it with Tmax at 75F diluted 1:9.

I know a couple of people that use Bergger film developed in Pyro. I've seen the
prints they make from it and they're excellent. I've seen 11x14 prints made from
35mm Bergger developed in Pyro and my first thought was that it was grainy 4x5 or
very good 6x4.5.




New photos are up.

http://www.ilford.com/html/us_englis...to.asp?ID=1274

http://www.ilford.com/html/us_englis...to.asp?ID=1273

http://www.ilford.com/html/us_englis...to.asp?ID=1272

http://www.ilford.com/html/us_englis...hael+Scarpitti
  #12  
Old October 13th 04, 04:23 PM
Frank Pittel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Robert Vervoordt wrote:
: I told you I'd be watching you. Couldn't help yourself, could you?

I thank you for it. :-) I've been thinking about what it is that we're trying
to accomplish. I don't believe that the goal is to get rid of him. I think that
it's an attempt to change his behavior. The best way to do that is to reward him
when he behaves himself and to punish him when he misbehaves. I was simply rewarding
him for his good behavior.

Of course he reacts by starting a troll thread about typewriters.


: On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 18:56:55 -0500, Frank Pittel
: wrote:

: Uranium Committee wrote:
: : "Reany" wrote in message ...
: : My darkroom has been packed away for many years. I'm setting it back up
: : again and I want advice on film. I used to use Kodak panatomic-x. What
: : film would you recommend as a substitute?
: :
: : Thanks
: : Gary
:
: : Several good choices:
:
: : Ilford Pan-F Plus, ISO 50. Try it in Paterson Acutol 1+19 for 8
: : minutes @ 20C/68F.
:
: A very good film but with the financialSP? issues that Ilford is having
: it may not last long even if Ilford survives.
:
: : Fotokemika KB 25 (same as the former Adox KB14). Very contrasty. Try
: : it in Paterson Acutol 1+22 for 7,5 minutes @ 20C/68F.
:
: I've met people that like it a lot but have never had any luck with it.
:
: : Ilford Delta 100. Try it in Paterson FX-39 1+19 for 7,5 minutes @
: : 20C/68F. This would be my choice.
:
: I spent a lot of time using Delta-100 this spring and like it a lot. I
: developed it with Iloford's DDX developer diluted 1:9 at 75F. Great tonality
: very good shadow detail and highlights that didn't block up.
:
: : Kodak T-Max 100 is also supposed to be good, but I don't like it.
:
: My personal opinion of Tmax-100 is that it's finest B&W film on the market.
: For sheet film I develop it with Tmax-RS at 75F diluted 1:9 and for roll
: film I develop it with Tmax at 75F diluted 1:9.
:
: I know a couple of people that use Bergger film developed in Pyro. I've seen the
: prints they make from it and they're excellent. I've seen 11x14 prints made from
: 35mm Bergger developed in Pyro and my first thought was that it was grainy 4x5 or
: very good 6x4.5.

: Robert Vervoordt, MFA

--




Keep working millions on welfare depend on you
-------------------

  #13  
Old October 13th 04, 04:23 PM
Frank Pittel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Robert Vervoordt wrote:
: I told you I'd be watching you. Couldn't help yourself, could you?

I thank you for it. :-) I've been thinking about what it is that we're trying
to accomplish. I don't believe that the goal is to get rid of him. I think that
it's an attempt to change his behavior. The best way to do that is to reward him
when he behaves himself and to punish him when he misbehaves. I was simply rewarding
him for his good behavior.

Of course he reacts by starting a troll thread about typewriters.


: On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 18:56:55 -0500, Frank Pittel
: wrote:

: Uranium Committee wrote:
: : "Reany" wrote in message ...
: : My darkroom has been packed away for many years. I'm setting it back up
: : again and I want advice on film. I used to use Kodak panatomic-x. What
: : film would you recommend as a substitute?
: :
: : Thanks
: : Gary
:
: : Several good choices:
:
: : Ilford Pan-F Plus, ISO 50. Try it in Paterson Acutol 1+19 for 8
: : minutes @ 20C/68F.
:
: A very good film but with the financialSP? issues that Ilford is having
: it may not last long even if Ilford survives.
:
: : Fotokemika KB 25 (same as the former Adox KB14). Very contrasty. Try
: : it in Paterson Acutol 1+22 for 7,5 minutes @ 20C/68F.
:
: I've met people that like it a lot but have never had any luck with it.
:
: : Ilford Delta 100. Try it in Paterson FX-39 1+19 for 7,5 minutes @
: : 20C/68F. This would be my choice.
:
: I spent a lot of time using Delta-100 this spring and like it a lot. I
: developed it with Iloford's DDX developer diluted 1:9 at 75F. Great tonality
: very good shadow detail and highlights that didn't block up.
:
: : Kodak T-Max 100 is also supposed to be good, but I don't like it.
:
: My personal opinion of Tmax-100 is that it's finest B&W film on the market.
: For sheet film I develop it with Tmax-RS at 75F diluted 1:9 and for roll
: film I develop it with Tmax at 75F diluted 1:9.
:
: I know a couple of people that use Bergger film developed in Pyro. I've seen the
: prints they make from it and they're excellent. I've seen 11x14 prints made from
: 35mm Bergger developed in Pyro and my first thought was that it was grainy 4x5 or
: very good 6x4.5.

: Robert Vervoordt, MFA

--




Keep working millions on welfare depend on you
-------------------

  #14  
Old October 13th 04, 04:46 PM
The Wogster
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Frank Pittel wrote:
Robert Vervoordt wrote:
: I told you I'd be watching you. Couldn't help yourself, could you?

I thank you for it. :-) I've been thinking about what it is that we're trying
to accomplish. I don't believe that the goal is to get rid of him. I think that
it's an attempt to change his behavior. The best way to do that is to reward him
when he behaves himself and to punish him when he misbehaves. I was simply rewarding
him for his good behavior.

Of course he reacts by starting a troll thread about typewriters.



Oh just killfile the clown already.....

You realize that all the talk about the troll, is just as much crap as
the postings of the troll. The best solution for trolls, is to killfile
them and ignore them. The problem is that posters do not seem to want
to ignore the troll, so we keep getting trolled.

W
  #15  
Old October 13th 04, 04:46 PM
The Wogster
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Frank Pittel wrote:
Robert Vervoordt wrote:
: I told you I'd be watching you. Couldn't help yourself, could you?

I thank you for it. :-) I've been thinking about what it is that we're trying
to accomplish. I don't believe that the goal is to get rid of him. I think that
it's an attempt to change his behavior. The best way to do that is to reward him
when he behaves himself and to punish him when he misbehaves. I was simply rewarding
him for his good behavior.

Of course he reacts by starting a troll thread about typewriters.



Oh just killfile the clown already.....

You realize that all the talk about the troll, is just as much crap as
the postings of the troll. The best solution for trolls, is to killfile
them and ignore them. The problem is that posters do not seem to want
to ignore the troll, so we keep getting trolled.

W
  #16  
Old October 13th 04, 10:11 PM
Gregory W Blank
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
The Wogster wrote:

Oh just killfile the clown already.....

You realize that all the talk about the troll, is just as much crap as
the postings of the troll. The best solution for trolls, is to killfile
them and ignore them. The problem is that posters do not seem to want
to ignore the troll, so we keep getting trolled.


Its like idiots that wave a biscuit in front of a dog,...only to
pull it from the dogs mouth at the last minute.....then they cry
when the dog bites them.
--
LF Website @ http://members.verizon.net/~gregoryblank

"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President,
or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong,
is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable
to the American public."--Theodore Roosevelt, May 7, 1918
  #17  
Old October 13th 04, 10:11 PM
Gregory W Blank
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
The Wogster wrote:

Oh just killfile the clown already.....

You realize that all the talk about the troll, is just as much crap as
the postings of the troll. The best solution for trolls, is to killfile
them and ignore them. The problem is that posters do not seem to want
to ignore the troll, so we keep getting trolled.


Its like idiots that wave a biscuit in front of a dog,...only to
pull it from the dogs mouth at the last minute.....then they cry
when the dog bites them.
--
LF Website @ http://members.verizon.net/~gregoryblank

"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President,
or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong,
is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable
to the American public."--Theodore Roosevelt, May 7, 1918
  #18  
Old October 13th 04, 10:11 PM
Gregory W Blank
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
The Wogster wrote:

Oh just killfile the clown already.....

You realize that all the talk about the troll, is just as much crap as
the postings of the troll. The best solution for trolls, is to killfile
them and ignore them. The problem is that posters do not seem to want
to ignore the troll, so we keep getting trolled.


Its like idiots that wave a biscuit in front of a dog,...only to
pull it from the dogs mouth at the last minute.....then they cry
when the dog bites them.
--
LF Website @ http://members.verizon.net/~gregoryblank

"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President,
or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong,
is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable
to the American public."--Theodore Roosevelt, May 7, 1918
  #19  
Old October 14th 04, 06:21 AM
John
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 21:11:26 GMT, Gregory W Blank
wrote:

Its like idiots that wave a biscuit in front of a dog,...only to
pull it from the dogs mouth at the last minute.....then they cry
when the dog bites them.


Best way to teach a dog not to bite is to bite them first.


Regards,

John S. Douglas, Photographer - http://www.puresilver.org
Please remove the "_" when replying via email
  #20  
Old October 14th 04, 10:09 AM
Robert Vervoordt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 10:23:04 -0500, Frank Pittel
wrote:

Robert Vervoordt wrote:
: I told you I'd be watching you. Couldn't help yourself, could you?

I thank you for it. :-) I've been thinking about what it is that we're trying
to accomplish. I don't believe that the goal is to get rid of him.


Perhaps not, but I'd take that if I couldn't get anything better.
Hmm, is there anything better?

I think that
it's an attempt to change his behavior. The best way to do that is to reward him
when he behaves himself and to punish him when he misbehaves. I was simply rewarding
him for his good behavior.


That's noble of you. Nobility should be recognized and rewarded.

Of course he reacts by starting a troll thread about typewriters.


Some reward! Consistent, to say the least; I just did.


: On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 18:56:55 -0500, Frank Pittel
: wrote:

: Uranium Committee wrote:
: : "Reany" wrote in message ...
: : My darkroom has been packed away for many years. I'm setting it back up
: : again and I want advice on film. I used to use Kodak panatomic-x. What
: : film would you recommend as a substitute?
: :
: : Thanks
: : Gary
:
: : Several good choices:
:
: : Ilford Pan-F Plus, ISO 50. Try it in Paterson Acutol 1+19 for 8
: : minutes @ 20C/68F.
:
: A very good film but with the financialSP? issues that Ilford is having
: it may not last long even if Ilford survives.
:
: : Fotokemika KB 25 (same as the former Adox KB14). Very contrasty. Try
: : it in Paterson Acutol 1+22 for 7,5 minutes @ 20C/68F.
:
: I've met people that like it a lot but have never had any luck with it.
:
: : Ilford Delta 100. Try it in Paterson FX-39 1+19 for 7,5 minutes @
: : 20C/68F. This would be my choice.
:
: I spent a lot of time using Delta-100 this spring and like it a lot. I
: developed it with Iloford's DDX developer diluted 1:9 at 75F. Great tonality
: very good shadow detail and highlights that didn't block up.
:
: : Kodak T-Max 100 is also supposed to be good, but I don't like it.
:
: My personal opinion of Tmax-100 is that it's finest B&W film on the market.
: For sheet film I develop it with Tmax-RS at 75F diluted 1:9 and for roll
: film I develop it with Tmax at 75F diluted 1:9.
:
: I know a couple of people that use Bergger film developed in Pyro. I've seen the
: prints they make from it and they're excellent. I've seen 11x14 prints made from
: 35mm Bergger developed in Pyro and my first thought was that it was grainy 4x5 or
: very good 6x4.5.


Robert Vervoordt, MFA
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Focal plane vs. leaf shutters in MF SLRs KM Medium Format Photography Equipment 724 December 7th 04 09:58 AM
Question on Polaroid 35mm Film Made by Agfa eb Film & Labs 2 August 3rd 04 11:02 PM
below $1000 film vs digital Mike Henley Medium Format Photography Equipment 182 June 25th 04 03:37 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.