If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
Dear Noob (that's funny)
Donald's advice (below mine) & the other posters is great. It's mostly just about what I was going to say. There are a few things I would like to emphase: 1. Buy several rolls of bad film to practice with. 2. If you buy 35mm stainless steel reels, if possible take a vernier caliper & measure the ID between the flanges @ 4 places (90 degs apart). If not equal return to store. If purchased used, try to bend back to equal. I wish I could tell you a + or – tolerance. But try to load any + all reels in the daylight before ever trying in the dark. A bent SS reel has got to be one of the most madding, frustrating, mother f'ing things on earth! If it's hard to load in the light, then it'll be impossible in the dark. Don't try to use it. Take the word of a veteran & save your self this grief. 3. Practice in the light, loading any or all reel(s) many times. 4. Then eyes closed many times. 5. Then blind folded (Well, maybe both #4 or #5 is a bit much. I do get a little carried away sometimes, but it can't hurt) 6. Then run through the entire process of processing useless film w/ lights on, a time or 2. Make sure U do everything: set up all 4 baths (dev. Stop, fixer, & wash); take the temperature of all 4 baths. They should be w/in + or – 3deg F of each other, & be between 65 & 75F. My exact #s may be a little off, so check what Kodak or Ilford say. Finally load the reel(s) & timing each step, process the dummy film. 7. Then # 6 W/ lights out. Can U start or set the timer accurately w/o lights? Will U know when each minute is up to agitate? This is where a darkroom specific timer such as a Gralab is so great. 8. When you are ready to do the deed for real, don't use a roll that has important shots. 9. One very important caution, do not use too much PhotoFlo. PhotoFlo is not one of those things that if a little is good, then a lot is better. Use exactly what Kodak says to use, or a little less. (I was working in a darkroom when a new kid dumped a whole bottle in a tank. What a mess!) 10. If U have problems w/ a particular reel, don't use it. Go back & read #2. #2 also applies to 120 reels, but not as much so. 11. If U drop a reel, no matter how little, go back to #2. 12. If U are a highly allergic person, U will probably become allergic to Metol. I think all Kodak developers use Metol. Or @ least Kodak uses no Phoedone. (I could be wrong on both counts) Many Illford developers use Phoedone (sp?), which causes far less allergic reactions. If U have allergic tendancies, find both a Phoedone based film & paper developer. Beside Illford, UFG film & LPD paper developer are both Phoedone based. They also give the bonus of a much longer life that Metol. 13. I highly recommend that U use a light tight tank for the developer. While developing film, particularly 400 ASA film is very sensitive to any light. It's not in the stop bath very long & it's loosing sensitivity while there. After 30 or so seconds in the fixer, the film has lost almost all sensitivity. So it's not as important to have light tightness in the stop & fix. For the 3 last baths any, old cheap container will do. An ordinary plastic dishpan will work to hold water to bring all the baths to the same temperature & can be used to wash the film. You'll still a 4th container for the PhotoFlo. Or U can use the PhotoFlo tank for the wash. 14. If U live in a hot climate & cannot get tap H2O below 75F or so, U will have to take special precautions. Call back if U do. Actually, I forget what the max temp. is for normal processing. Can someone help? I realize that my recommendations are perhaps a bit anal, (who me? Anal? Never) & U certainly don't have to take them all, but they can save you some grief. With all my & the other posters great advice how can you go wrong? John Donald Qualls wrote in message news:YTHZc.14964$3l3.9424@attbi_s03... EC wrote: G'day all! I am really wanting to develop my own B&W film at home. The 4 big questions I have a What are the basics I should be looking at as far as chemicals, equipment, enlarger, etc.? How much should I be expecting to spend to get started? What film/chemical combo is a good start for a noob? What are some good resources to read to learn the basics? TIA! EC Most basic: a B&W (silver based, not C-41 process) film with a comfortable speed for the type of photography you do (if you don't know, start with ISO 400; you can easily change later), a liquid concentrate developer like HC-110, Ilfotec HC, or Rodinal (for keeping qualities and ease of dilution to use one-shot), and any brand of liquid rapid fixer concentrate. You can use water for stop bath just as readily as an indicator acid stop product (some will say it's better). Strongly preferred is to get a wetting agent (PhotoFlo 200 or other brand equivalent) to prevent water spotting, and buy distilled (or at least filtered) water for mixing chemicals and washing. Measuring equipment can come from the housewares department in a large supermarket -- cups in one cup, two cup, or two quart sizes are cheap and accurate enough, and all are marked in milliliters as well as ounces these days. A darkroom type thermometer is good to have, but cheap; mine cost $5 and doubles nicely as a stirring rod. You'll need a daylight film tank and reel that fits the size film you shoot -- new, this will cost between $15 and $60, depending on brand and versatility. It's worth getting the better type (Kindermann or Paterson; look for Hewes stainless reels to make any brand of stainless tank easier) unless you're on a severe budget and have some previous experience. Unless you have previous experience loading reels, you're likely to find the Paterson plastic reels easiest to load, and the Paterson tank is one of the best. You'll need a source of darkness for loading the daylight tank -- I use a changing bag; if you get one, get the larger size (27x27 inches, IIRC), which has three times the internal space of a small bag for a lot less than twice the money. Some folks go into a closet, at night, with the house lights out, and stuff a towel under the door, or do the same with their bathroom (watch out for LED lights on chargers for electric razors, clock displays, night lights, etc., which can fog film from anywhere in the room); if you have fluorescent lights, turn them out for ten minutes before starting to load film to avoid fogging from afterglow of the phosphors. And you'll need detailed instructions and practice, both for loading the tank, for mixing and measuring chemicals, and for the process of filling the tank, timing and agitating, draining and refilling. Sacrifice a roll of film (you can buy expired film, even color, to practice with; you're not going to actually develop it anyway; if it's more than $1 per roll, look some more, but make sure it's 36 exposure if you're shooting 35 mm, because the longer rolls handle differently from the short ones), practice opening the cassette or unrolling the backing paper, starting the film on the reel, and feeding it in; first, in the light. When you get comfortable with it, try it with your eyes closed. When you can do it consistently with eyes closed, try it a few times with the scrap film in the dark before you try it with important images. Developing film is easy; I learned to do it at age 10, and did it successfully unsupervised after doing it once in summer camp. Fine tuning the process so you get negatives that are easy to print and have the qualities you want, to fit the images you want to make, requires practice, study, and sometimes a little luck in finding just the right combination of film, developer, and process details -- and then all of that is further dependent on the enlarger, paper, and paper developer, or scanning and printing system you use to arrive at a final print. If you're willing to take your time and buy used, in the United States, you should be able to get the equipment and chemicals to just develop one size of negatives for under $50 (with luck, you might shave another $10 or $20 off that figure, but $50 is a figure you can be confident of if you don't mind spending a few weeks on eBay looking at used tanks and such); I spent close to $100, but I'm set up to develop film sizes from 16 mm through 4x5 sheets in three different developers. You can do it with new equipment for one size of film for under $100 and have money left to buy a few rolls of Tri-X. -- I may be a scwewy wabbit, but I'm not going to Alcatwaz! -- E. J. Fudd, 1954 Donald Qualls, aka The Silent Observer Lathe Building Pages http://silent1.home.netcom.com/HomebuiltLathe.htm Speedway 7x12 Lathe Pages http://silent1.home.netcom.com/my7x12.htm Opinions expressed are my own -- take them for what they're worth and don't expect them to be perfect. |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
Dear Noob (that's funny)
Donald's advice (below mine) & the other posters is great. It's mostly just about what I was going to say. There are a few things I would like to emphase: 1. Buy several rolls of bad film to practice with. 2. If you buy 35mm stainless steel reels, if possible take a vernier caliper & measure the ID between the flanges @ 4 places (90 degs apart). If not equal return to store. If purchased used, try to bend back to equal. I wish I could tell you a + or – tolerance. But try to load any + all reels in the daylight before ever trying in the dark. A bent SS reel has got to be one of the most madding, frustrating, mother f'ing things on earth! If it's hard to load in the light, then it'll be impossible in the dark. Don't try to use it. Take the word of a veteran & save your self this grief. 3. Practice in the light, loading any or all reel(s) many times. 4. Then eyes closed many times. 5. Then blind folded (Well, maybe both #4 or #5 is a bit much. I do get a little carried away sometimes, but it can't hurt) 6. Then run through the entire process of processing useless film w/ lights on, a time or 2. Make sure U do everything: set up all 4 baths (dev. Stop, fixer, & wash); take the temperature of all 4 baths. They should be w/in + or – 3deg F of each other, & be between 65 & 75F. My exact #s may be a little off, so check what Kodak or Ilford say. Finally load the reel(s) & timing each step, process the dummy film. 7. Then # 6 W/ lights out. Can U start or set the timer accurately w/o lights? Will U know when each minute is up to agitate? This is where a darkroom specific timer such as a Gralab is so great. 8. When you are ready to do the deed for real, don't use a roll that has important shots. 9. One very important caution, do not use too much PhotoFlo. PhotoFlo is not one of those things that if a little is good, then a lot is better. Use exactly what Kodak says to use, or a little less. (I was working in a darkroom when a new kid dumped a whole bottle in a tank. What a mess!) 10. If U have problems w/ a particular reel, don't use it. Go back & read #2. #2 also applies to 120 reels, but not as much so. 11. If U drop a reel, no matter how little, go back to #2. 12. If U are a highly allergic person, U will probably become allergic to Metol. I think all Kodak developers use Metol. Or @ least Kodak uses no Phoedone. (I could be wrong on both counts) Many Illford developers use Phoedone (sp?), which causes far less allergic reactions. If U have allergic tendancies, find both a Phoedone based film & paper developer. Beside Illford, UFG film & LPD paper developer are both Phoedone based. They also give the bonus of a much longer life that Metol. 13. I highly recommend that U use a light tight tank for the developer. While developing film, particularly 400 ASA film is very sensitive to any light. It's not in the stop bath very long & it's loosing sensitivity while there. After 30 or so seconds in the fixer, the film has lost almost all sensitivity. So it's not as important to have light tightness in the stop & fix. For the 3 last baths any, old cheap container will do. An ordinary plastic dishpan will work to hold water to bring all the baths to the same temperature & can be used to wash the film. You'll still a 4th container for the PhotoFlo. Or U can use the PhotoFlo tank for the wash. 14. If U live in a hot climate & cannot get tap H2O below 75F or so, U will have to take special precautions. Call back if U do. Actually, I forget what the max temp. is for normal processing. Can someone help? I realize that my recommendations are perhaps a bit anal, (who me? Anal? Never) & U certainly don't have to take them all, but they can save you some grief. With all my & the other posters great advice how can you go wrong? John Donald Qualls wrote in message news:YTHZc.14964$3l3.9424@attbi_s03... EC wrote: G'day all! I am really wanting to develop my own B&W film at home. The 4 big questions I have a What are the basics I should be looking at as far as chemicals, equipment, enlarger, etc.? How much should I be expecting to spend to get started? What film/chemical combo is a good start for a noob? What are some good resources to read to learn the basics? TIA! EC Most basic: a B&W (silver based, not C-41 process) film with a comfortable speed for the type of photography you do (if you don't know, start with ISO 400; you can easily change later), a liquid concentrate developer like HC-110, Ilfotec HC, or Rodinal (for keeping qualities and ease of dilution to use one-shot), and any brand of liquid rapid fixer concentrate. You can use water for stop bath just as readily as an indicator acid stop product (some will say it's better). Strongly preferred is to get a wetting agent (PhotoFlo 200 or other brand equivalent) to prevent water spotting, and buy distilled (or at least filtered) water for mixing chemicals and washing. Measuring equipment can come from the housewares department in a large supermarket -- cups in one cup, two cup, or two quart sizes are cheap and accurate enough, and all are marked in milliliters as well as ounces these days. A darkroom type thermometer is good to have, but cheap; mine cost $5 and doubles nicely as a stirring rod. You'll need a daylight film tank and reel that fits the size film you shoot -- new, this will cost between $15 and $60, depending on brand and versatility. It's worth getting the better type (Kindermann or Paterson; look for Hewes stainless reels to make any brand of stainless tank easier) unless you're on a severe budget and have some previous experience. Unless you have previous experience loading reels, you're likely to find the Paterson plastic reels easiest to load, and the Paterson tank is one of the best. You'll need a source of darkness for loading the daylight tank -- I use a changing bag; if you get one, get the larger size (27x27 inches, IIRC), which has three times the internal space of a small bag for a lot less than twice the money. Some folks go into a closet, at night, with the house lights out, and stuff a towel under the door, or do the same with their bathroom (watch out for LED lights on chargers for electric razors, clock displays, night lights, etc., which can fog film from anywhere in the room); if you have fluorescent lights, turn them out for ten minutes before starting to load film to avoid fogging from afterglow of the phosphors. And you'll need detailed instructions and practice, both for loading the tank, for mixing and measuring chemicals, and for the process of filling the tank, timing and agitating, draining and refilling. Sacrifice a roll of film (you can buy expired film, even color, to practice with; you're not going to actually develop it anyway; if it's more than $1 per roll, look some more, but make sure it's 36 exposure if you're shooting 35 mm, because the longer rolls handle differently from the short ones), practice opening the cassette or unrolling the backing paper, starting the film on the reel, and feeding it in; first, in the light. When you get comfortable with it, try it with your eyes closed. When you can do it consistently with eyes closed, try it a few times with the scrap film in the dark before you try it with important images. Developing film is easy; I learned to do it at age 10, and did it successfully unsupervised after doing it once in summer camp. Fine tuning the process so you get negatives that are easy to print and have the qualities you want, to fit the images you want to make, requires practice, study, and sometimes a little luck in finding just the right combination of film, developer, and process details -- and then all of that is further dependent on the enlarger, paper, and paper developer, or scanning and printing system you use to arrive at a final print. If you're willing to take your time and buy used, in the United States, you should be able to get the equipment and chemicals to just develop one size of negatives for under $50 (with luck, you might shave another $10 or $20 off that figure, but $50 is a figure you can be confident of if you don't mind spending a few weeks on eBay looking at used tanks and such); I spent close to $100, but I'm set up to develop film sizes from 16 mm through 4x5 sheets in three different developers. You can do it with new equipment for one size of film for under $100 and have money left to buy a few rolls of Tri-X. -- I may be a scwewy wabbit, but I'm not going to Alcatwaz! -- E. J. Fudd, 1954 Donald Qualls, aka The Silent Observer Lathe Building Pages http://silent1.home.netcom.com/HomebuiltLathe.htm Speedway 7x12 Lathe Pages http://silent1.home.netcom.com/my7x12.htm Opinions expressed are my own -- take them for what they're worth and don't expect them to be perfect. |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
"Michael R. Lachance" wrote in message ink.net... Ken, I worked in one lab where we used a small table top roller machine for our BW portrait proofs, I forget what make and model it was, but in retrospect (14 years later) it would have made one hell of a great RA4 processor for a home darkroom setup! Check that auction site. I picked up a ThermaPhot 302 VR for less than $500. I had been doing the tube thing for way too many years. Not ever, not even once, going back. The Jobo is relegated to processing film. I also picked up a CAP-40 processor from the same guy for $50.00. Need to be cleaned real good and some wiring fixed (those crimp-on/push-on terminals had all corroded), but it does IlfoChromes wonderfully. The thing's darned huge, however. |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
"Michael R. Lachance" wrote in message ink.net... Ken, I worked in one lab where we used a small table top roller machine for our BW portrait proofs, I forget what make and model it was, but in retrospect (14 years later) it would have made one hell of a great RA4 processor for a home darkroom setup! Check that auction site. I picked up a ThermaPhot 302 VR for less than $500. I had been doing the tube thing for way too many years. Not ever, not even once, going back. The Jobo is relegated to processing film. I also picked up a CAP-40 processor from the same guy for $50.00. Need to be cleaned real good and some wiring fixed (those crimp-on/push-on terminals had all corroded), but it does IlfoChromes wonderfully. The thing's darned huge, however. |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
EC wrote in message ...
There are many books at the library, and of course we need to know what format you plan to use. Are you working with 35mm? If so, be sure to select a book that concentrates on 35mm, because it has its own technique that differs somewhat from that used with large format (sheet film). Wow! Thanks everyone! There are some great suggestions here. Thank you kindly. It seems that this newsgroup is much more useful than some of the other newsgroups in the rec.photo hierarchy! To answer some of the questions asked: I am in Canada and am shooting 35mm negatives. I only shot slides for a little while after taking a very basic course sometime ago. I would love to take a darkroom course but have not yet found any courses locally. Initially I think I do want to print, but may eventually scan the negatives. Thanks, again, EC Scanning is not really equivalent to printing. A negative that makes a good print may not scan well at all. If you're going to develop your own film, you are pretty much committing yourself to an enlarger. |
#56
|
|||
|
|||
EC wrote in message ...
There are many books at the library, and of course we need to know what format you plan to use. Are you working with 35mm? If so, be sure to select a book that concentrates on 35mm, because it has its own technique that differs somewhat from that used with large format (sheet film). Wow! Thanks everyone! There are some great suggestions here. Thank you kindly. It seems that this newsgroup is much more useful than some of the other newsgroups in the rec.photo hierarchy! To answer some of the questions asked: I am in Canada and am shooting 35mm negatives. I only shot slides for a little while after taking a very basic course sometime ago. I would love to take a darkroom course but have not yet found any courses locally. Initially I think I do want to print, but may eventually scan the negatives. Thanks, again, EC Scanning is not really equivalent to printing. A negative that makes a good print may not scan well at all. If you're going to develop your own film, you are pretty much committing yourself to an enlarger. |
#57
|
|||
|
|||
EC wrote:
G'day all! I am really wanting to develop my own B&W film at home. The 4 big questions I have a What are the basics I should be looking at as far as chemicals, equipment, enlarger, etc.? How much should I be expecting to spend to get started? What film/chemical combo is a good start for a noob? What are some good resources to read to learn the basics? A quick search using Google for "developing your own black and white film" brings back a ton of great results. One that I have read through and can recommend is this: http://photography.about.com/library.../aa051401a.htm I would really suggest contacting your local colleges to see if they run photography courses. I paid 25UKP to go on a 16 week one earlier this year and I had full use of a huge 9 workstation dark room for 3 hours every Wednesday night, with tuition! I also got the 25UKP back (actually, much much more!) through student discount at the cinema and when purchasing photography equipment from Jessops! You don't say if you want to develop film and print too, but if your only interested in developing film it should cost you less than 40UKP from eBay.co.uk for equipment and Jessops for chemicals. If you also want to print your own pictures, this will cost significantly more, but less than 350UKP for good equipment. I hope that helps. Thanks, Andrew McCall |
#58
|
|||
|
|||
EC wrote:
G'day all! I am really wanting to develop my own B&W film at home. The 4 big questions I have a What are the basics I should be looking at as far as chemicals, equipment, enlarger, etc.? How much should I be expecting to spend to get started? What film/chemical combo is a good start for a noob? What are some good resources to read to learn the basics? A quick search using Google for "developing your own black and white film" brings back a ton of great results. One that I have read through and can recommend is this: http://photography.about.com/library.../aa051401a.htm I would really suggest contacting your local colleges to see if they run photography courses. I paid 25UKP to go on a 16 week one earlier this year and I had full use of a huge 9 workstation dark room for 3 hours every Wednesday night, with tuition! I also got the 25UKP back (actually, much much more!) through student discount at the cinema and when purchasing photography equipment from Jessops! You don't say if you want to develop film and print too, but if your only interested in developing film it should cost you less than 40UKP from eBay.co.uk for equipment and Jessops for chemicals. If you also want to print your own pictures, this will cost significantly more, but less than 350UKP for good equipment. I hope that helps. Thanks, Andrew McCall |
#59
|
|||
|
|||
EC wrote:
G'day mates . . . . What film/chemical combo is a good start for a noob? ... 'Antipodean Noob', eh? Have to look that one up .. . . . here it is. Well, that certainly puts a different spin on it: For film it says 'sweat' For chemical it says 'beer' -- Nicholas O. Lindan, Cleveland, Ohio Consulting Engineer: Electronics; Informatics; Photonics. |
#60
|
|||
|
|||
EC wrote:
G'day mates . . . . What film/chemical combo is a good start for a noob? ... 'Antipodean Noob', eh? Have to look that one up .. . . . here it is. Well, that certainly puts a different spin on it: For film it says 'sweat' For chemical it says 'beer' -- Nicholas O. Lindan, Cleveland, Ohio Consulting Engineer: Electronics; Informatics; Photonics. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Develper for Delta-100 | Frank Pittel | In The Darkroom | 8 | March 1st 04 04:36 PM |
Darkroom rental on SF peninsula? | Steve Gilbert | In The Darkroom | 2 | February 26th 04 05:00 AM |
New darkroom, first batch of many questions. | Tom Gardner | In The Darkroom | 15 | February 22nd 04 01:05 PM |
Ventilation of New Darkroom Question | SofaKing | In The Darkroom | 17 | February 15th 04 06:05 PM |
Darkroom or Scanner? | Mike King | In The Darkroom | 0 | January 30th 04 03:34 PM |