If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Panasonic first pic number
I've just bought a 'new' Panasonic Lumix compact and the index of the first
pic I took was 236 (P1000236). While I am sure some test shots will be taken at the factory I'd expect that last thing done would be to reset the camera to defaults and the pic count to zero. Have I been sold an ex demo shop model as new or am I being too suspicious? If you have a any Panasonic or other compact I'd be interested in your memories of the first picture number. Thanks, -- Peter |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Panasonic first pic number
In article , Peter Burke
wrote: I've just bought a 'new' Panasonic Lumix compact and the index of the first pic I took was 236 (P1000236). While I am sure some test shots will be taken at the factory I'd expect that last thing done would be to reset the camera to defaults and the pic count to zero. Have I been sold an ex demo shop model as new or am I being too suspicious? that's a bit high for routine q/a at the factory. was the box sealed? was there any indication of having been opened at all? also keep in mind that the file name does not necessarily mean shutter count. it can trivially be set to anything. the proper way to find out the shutter count is by looking at the shutter count tag in exif, which most cameras write. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Panasonic first pic number
The first photo out of my G3 was P1000001.
On Fri, 12 Sep 2014 19:00:33 +0000, Peter Burke wrote: I've just bought a 'new' Panasonic Lumix compact and the index of the first pic I took was 236 (P1000236). While I am sure some test shots will be taken at the factory I'd expect that last thing done would be to reset the camera to defaults and the pic count to zero. Have I been sold an ex demo shop model as new or am I being too suspicious? If you have a any Panasonic or other compact I'd be interested in your memories of the first picture number. Thanks, |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Panasonic first pic number
Peter Burke wrote:
I've just bought a 'new' Panasonic Lumix compact and the index of the first pic I took was 236 (P1000236). While I am sure some test shots will be taken at the factory I'd expect that last thing done would be to reset the camera to defaults and the pic count to zero. Have I been sold an ex demo shop model as new or am I being too suspicious? If you have a any Panasonic or other compact I'd be interested in your memories of the first picture number. Thanks, Hi, The first jpeg # on my new Canon S-120 is: 105-0754. I have no idea what the numbers mean, other than the prefix is apparently a folder,and the suffix is a picture in that folder. The folders change every month, automatically. Mort Linder --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Panasonic first pic number
On 12/09/2014 22:45, ray carter wrote:
The first photo out of my G3 was P1000001. First from my GX7 was: P1000001.JPG, and the same for my wife's. -- Cheers, David Web: http://www.satsignal.eu |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Panasonic first pic number
David Taylor wrote in news:lv0pfb
: On 12/09/2014 22:45, ray carter wrote: The first photo out of my G3 was P1000001. First from my GX7 was: P1000001.JPG, and the same for my wife's. Thanks to all who replied. It seems clear that Panasonics are shipped with a zero pic count so I will be taking it up with the online supplier as a misdescribed item. For information, the box was a little tatty and not factory sealed. Certain accessories, the CD and instructions remained in sealed packaging so it suggests to me that it was a shop demo model rather than a customer return although the pic count seems high even for that. I will probably end up keeping the item as it is now a discontinued model and hard to get hold of but reviews place it as significantly better than its relpacement so it is worth keeping. It was also sold at a healthy discount to the price at launch. The seller will not be getting off lightly however for the misdescription. For info, exif info on this model is a little light and does not contain the shutter count. Thanks again. -- Peter |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Panasonic first pic number
In article , Peter Burke says...
I've just bought a 'new' Panasonic Lumix compact and the index of the first pic I took was 236 (P1000236). While I am sure some test shots will be taken at the factory I'd expect that last thing done would be to reset the camera to defaults and the pic count to zero. Have I been sold an ex demo shop model as new or am I being too suspicious? If you have a any Panasonic or other compact I'd be interested in your memories of the first picture number. Was the memory card you put first inside really empty or was there perhaps a P*****235.jpg picture inside it? Sometimes cameras adjust the internal counter according to the content on the memory card. -- Alfred Molon Olympus E-series DSLRs and micro 4/3 forum at http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/MyOlympus/ http://myolympus.org/ photo sharing site |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Panasonic first pic number
Alfred Molon wrote in
: Was the memory card you put first inside really empty or was there perhaps a P*****235.jpg picture inside it? Sometimes cameras adjust the internal counter according to the content on the memory card. No, it was a new card. In common with quite a few manufacturers, Panasonic has the option to: 1. default Remember the picture index and apply it to the filename irrespective of which memory card is fitted. This allows swapping of memory cards at leisure but maintains picture sorting order by filename when the pictures are combined in a folder on a PC. 2. Reset the picture number when the memory card is changed. 3. Reset the remembered picture index so it can all start from 1 again. I don't think I'll be telling the seller that option 3 exists to safeguard their future customers . . . . -- Peter |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Panasonic first pic number
In article , Peter Burke
wrote: For info, exif info on this model is a little light and does not contain the shutter count. what did you use to check the exif? not all exif readers show all tags. the best is phil harvey's exif tool, which will show everything that's there. however, it appears that panasonic might not write the shutter count tag, and going into service mode is required. you didn't say which panasonic camera, but if the following doesn't work with yours then you can probably find the correct buttons with a search: http://pindelski.org/Photography/201...ic-g1-shutter- count/ |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Panasonic first pic number
In article , Peter Burke
wrote: Was the memory card you put first inside really empty or was there perhaps a P*****235.jpg picture inside it? Sometimes cameras adjust the internal counter according to the content on the memory card. No, it was a new card. In common with quite a few manufacturers, Panasonic has the option to: 1. default Remember the picture index and apply it to the filename irrespective of which memory card is fitted. This allows swapping of memory cards at leisure but maintains picture sorting order by filename when the pictures are combined in a folder on a PC. note that someone could have taken one photo with a card that had a higher number, which will update the file name counter from that point forward, even if you use a new card. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
six six six the number of the beast:-) | Tzorzakakis Dimitrios | Digital Photography | 0 | June 20th 09 06:03 PM |
F Number | [email protected] | Digital SLR Cameras | 15 | December 24th 06 04:22 AM |
PSU & number of USB devices | frankg | Digital Photography | 3 | January 5th 06 10:51 AM |
350d serial number - what serial number?!? | GT | Digital Photography | 12 | April 7th 05 08:58 PM |
350d serial number - what serial number?!? | GT | Digital Photography | 0 | April 6th 05 04:02 PM |