If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Crop vs Converter
What's the best make do if you cant afford proper fullframe glass? A
crop camera or a 1.4 teleconverter. The crop camera gives more speed but a fullframe sensor should give you less noise to compensate for that. I think that a lot people deep into telephoto are interested in that! -- teleportation kills http://tinyurl.com/androidphotography |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Crop vs Converter
On 2014-08-13 12:37:01 +0000, android said:
What's the best make do if you cant afford proper fullframe glass? A crop camera or a 1.4 teleconverter. The crop camera gives more speed but a fullframe sensor should give you less noise to compensate for that. I think that a lot people deep into telephoto are interested in that! The 24MP DX sensor on the D7100 @ $1,099 and with 6fps, and reasonable low light performance probably gives you the best value these days. I am not a great proponent of TCs. Add a Nikkor 70-300mm VRII to the 24MP D7100 and you will have plenty of crop room. Add the new Tamron 150-600mm VC and you have more reach than you could possibly need. Hell! with my measly 12MP D300S + the 70-300mm I can still get shots like this: https://db.tt/HrtYe2HG -- Regards, Savageduck |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Crop vs Converter
android wrote:
What's the best make do if you cant afford proper fullframe glass? A crop camera or a 1.4 teleconverter. The crop camera gives more speed but a fullframe sensor should give you less noise to compensate for that. I think that a lot people deep into telephoto are interested in that! Use of a 1.4x TC does make a FF lens out of one with only cropped frame coverage. Unfortunately, while that is pretty reasonable for longer lenses, it isn't nearly as viable for shorter focal lengths. Regardless of that, how many long focal length lenses are there that don't cover a full frame sensor? -- Floyd L. Davidson http://www.apaflo.com/ Ukpeagvik (Barrow, Alaska) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Crop vs Converter
"android" wrote in message ... What's the best make do if you cant afford proper fullframe glass? A crop camera or a 1.4 teleconverter. The crop camera gives more speed but a fullframe sensor should give you less noise to compensate for that. I think that a lot people deep into telephoto are interested in that! If the converter I have is anything to go by, don't waste your money. It's not aftermarket either. -- teleportation kills http://tinyurl.com/androidphotography |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Crop vs Converter
In article ,
"R. Mark Clayton" wrote: "android" wrote in message ... What's the best make do if you cant afford proper fullframe glass? A crop camera or a 1.4 teleconverter. The crop camera gives more speed but a fullframe sensor should give you less noise to compensate for that. I think that a lot people deep into telephoto are interested in that! If the converter I have is anything to go by, don't waste your money. It's not aftermarket either. Good to know... :-) -- teleportation kills http://tinyurl.com/androidphotography |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Crop vs Converter
On 2014-08-13 14:00:22 +0000, android said:
In article , (Floyd L. Davidson) wrote: android wrote: What's the best make do if you cant afford proper fullframe glass? A crop camera or a 1.4 teleconverter. The crop camera gives more speed but a fullframe sensor should give you less noise to compensate for that. I think that a lot people deep into telephoto are interested in that! Use of a 1.4x TC does make a FF lens out of one with only cropped frame coverage. Unfortunately, while that is pretty reasonable for longer lenses, it isn't nearly as viable for shorter focal lengths. No, but alot crop people seem to crave that extra reach. The crop folks already have that reach, by going DX they have an effective x1.5. In this group it seems to be a few FF folks (one I can think of) who want that extra reach by compromising with a TC. Regardless of that, how many long focal length lenses are there that don't cover a full frame sensor? Don't know but SD would be able to keep he's reach. That aside: They might have a circle of confusion thats covers FF but they are not designed to take advantage of that. I E be sharp in the corners of a fullframe sensor. If they a Then it's luck! That would be using a DX lens on a FF body, not a FF lens on a DX body. -- Regards, Savageduck |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Crop vs Converter
In article 2014081307235064561-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom,
Savageduck wrote: On 2014-08-13 14:00:22 +0000, android said: In article , (Floyd L. Davidson) wrote: android wrote: What's the best make do if you cant afford proper fullframe glass? A crop camera or a 1.4 teleconverter. The crop camera gives more speed but a fullframe sensor should give you less noise to compensate for that. I think that a lot people deep into telephoto are interested in that! Use of a 1.4x TC does make a FF lens out of one with only cropped frame coverage. Unfortunately, while that is pretty reasonable for longer lenses, it isn't nearly as viable for shorter focal lengths. No, but alot crop people seem to crave that extra reach. The crop folks already have that reach, by going DX they have an effective x1.5. In this group it seems to be a few FF folks (one I can think of) who want that extra reach by compromising with a TC. The TC would reproduce the effect of a crop sensor on a FF camera. Hence: Crop vs Converter Regardless of that, how many long focal length lenses are there that don't cover a full frame sensor? Don't know but SD would be able to keep he's reach. That aside: They might have a circle of confusion thats covers FF but they are not designed to take advantage of that. I E be sharp in the corners of a fullframe sensor. If they a Then it's luck! That would be using a DX lens on a FF body, not a FF lens on a DX body. Yes, and that was the prerequisite. -- teleportation kills http://tinyurl.com/androidphotography |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Crop vs Converter
On Wed, 13 Aug 2014 06:07:40 -0700, Savageduck
wrote: On 2014-08-13 12:37:01 +0000, android said: What's the best make do if you cant afford proper fullframe glass? A crop camera or a 1.4 teleconverter. The crop camera gives more speed but a fullframe sensor should give you less noise to compensate for that. I think that a lot people deep into telephoto are interested in that! The 24MP DX sensor on the D7100 @ $1,099 and with 6fps, and reasonable low light performance probably gives you the best value these days. 6fps only for jpg. Shooting raw you fill the buffer after ~3shots and then you're stuck with how fast your card is and it still is the crucial factor even with an Extreme Pro 95MB/sec SD card. Also feels like I went back in time to my D70 as most of the controls are concerned. I am not a great proponent of TCs. Add a Nikkor 70-300mm VRII to the 24MP D7100 and you will have plenty of crop room. Add the new Tamron 150-600mm VC and you have more reach than you could possibly need. One has to evaluate specific TC/lens pairs.I find the TC-14EII behind a first gen 200-400mm f/4 VR to be fine. Depends what type of birds you want to shoot as to how much is enough reach. Hell! with my measly 12MP D300S + the 70-300mm I can still get shots like this: https://db.tt/HrtYe2HG Now try something with about 1/10th or smaller of that wingspan in flight. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Crop vs Converter
me wrote:
On Wed, 13 Aug 2014 06:07:40 -0700, Savageduck wrote: On 2014-08-13 12:37:01 +0000, android said: What's the best make do if you cant afford proper fullframe glass? A crop camera or a 1.4 teleconverter. The crop camera gives more speed but a fullframe sensor should give you less noise to compensate for that. I think that a lot people deep into telephoto are interested in that! The 24MP DX sensor on the D7100 @ $1,099 and with 6fps, and reasonable low light performance probably gives you the best value these days. 6fps only for jpg. Shooting raw you fill the buffer after ~3shots and then you're stuck with how fast your card is and it still is the crucial factor even with an Extreme Pro 95MB/sec SD card. The User Manual says otherwise. For 12-bit NEF and JPEG, 6 frames per second. It slows to only 5 fps with 14-bit NEF. The memory buffer is specified for 6 lossless compressed 14 bit NEF files and 7 lossless compressed 12 bit NEF files. It's pretty hard to argue with that for a 24 MP DX sensor at that price. Also feels like I went back in time to my D70 as most of the controls are concerned. Yes, Nikon always has done a good job on controls. I am not a great proponent of TCs. Add a Nikkor 70-300mm VRII to the 24MP D7100 and you will have plenty of crop room. Add the new Tamron 150-600mm VC and you have more reach than you could possibly need. One has to evaluate specific TC/lens pairs.I find the TC-14EII behind a first gen 200-400mm f/4 VR to be fine. Depends what type of birds you want to shoot as to how much is enough reach. Hell! with my measly 12MP D300S + the 70-300mm I can still get shots like this: https://db.tt/HrtYe2HG Now try something with about 1/10th or smaller of that wingspan in flight. Well, of course that is a different problem. Still, a D7100 will be about the best buy in a camera for that too. -- Floyd L. Davidson http://www.apaflo.com/ Ukpeagvik (Barrow, Alaska) |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Why don't crop sensor cameras have crop weight bodies? | Wally | Digital SLR Cameras | 59 | February 13th 11 12:52 AM |
Why don't crop sensor cameras have crop weight bodies? | Ray Fischer | Digital Photography | 12 | February 12th 11 12:12 AM |
How to crop this photo? | Andrew Koenig | Digital Photography | 2 | December 2nd 08 01:23 AM |
Cut vs crop. | irwell | Digital Photography | 8 | March 24th 07 03:17 PM |
How would you crop this? | 223rem | Digital Photography | 30 | November 5th 06 12:11 AM |