A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Digital Photography » Digital Photography
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Flare



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old February 1st 07, 08:08 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
stuseven
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 72
Default Flare

+ Not to start a flare-war here(!)... but, the only reason I
suggested
using a polarizer was the great success I had using one, with film,
taking pictures of lit lightbulbs. I was able to get very detailed
picture of printing on top of lit bulb, instead of the usual flared
light
effect from a bright light in frame.
Frankly, Id have to say, if you meter for the brightest light, the
picture will be fine, polarizer or no.


On Jan 29, 6:04 pm, "Nervous Nick" wrote:

II would expect that, if anything, adding a polarizer would likely
*worsen* any existing flare problem; along the lines of what Bob was
talking about, you would be introducing another glass/air interface
into the equation.


YOP...



  #12  
Old February 1st 07, 09:01 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
Ken Lucke
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 845
Default Flare

In article .com,
stuseven wrote:

+ Not to start a flare-war here(!)... but, the only reason I
suggested
using a polarizer was the great success I had using one, with film,
taking pictures of lit lightbulbs. I was able to get very detailed
picture of printing on top of lit bulb, instead of the usual flared
light
effect from a bright light in frame.


Different kind of "flare" :^)

What you appear to be referring to is overexposure of and around an
intense light source. "Lens Flare" refers to the spots & sundogs that
are created on the sensor/film/image which are a result of light
bouncing around inside the lens (very simplistically), which usually
happens when shooting into, or nearly into, a bright light source.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lens_flare shows some examples.

Frankly, Id have to say, if you meter for the brightest light, the
picture will be fine, polarizer or no.


On Jan 29, 6:04 pm, "Nervous Nick" wrote:

II would expect that, if anything, adding a polarizer would likely
*worsen* any existing flare problem; along the lines of what Bob was
talking about, you would be introducing another glass/air interface
into the equation.


YOP...




--
You need only reflect that one of the best ways to get yourself a
reputation as a dangerous citizen these days is to go about repeating
the very phrases which our founding fathers used in the struggle for
independence.
-- Charles A. Beard
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Lens flare makeup [email protected] Digital Photography 8 December 12th 06 01:10 AM
Flare or CA on the 105mm VR Paul Furman 35mm Photo Equipment 1 June 23rd 06 11:32 PM
Flare or CA on the 105mm VR ColinD 35mm Photo Equipment 0 June 23rd 06 12:29 AM
Flare problem Peter Digital SLR Cameras 6 March 14th 06 11:44 AM
Nikkor 24 f2.8D and Lens Flare [email protected] Digital Photography 6 February 21st 06 05:22 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.