If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
RemJet (was Q: processing Kodachrome 25 color slide to get B&W?)
I'm puzzled. Again, I'm away from my bookshelf and can't provide a
reference, but I believe it is discussed L.F.A. Mason, "Photographic Processing Chemistry." Mason was Ilford's chief scientist and published his book in about 1960. Focal Press, of course. According to Mason, these backings are added to films meant to be processed on long-roll processors which have a large number of spools ("bobbins") over which the film must pass. Complex processes like Kodachrome and early movie films involve many immersions and the film has to be carried through a relatively large number of tanks. The backing's main function appears to be protecting the film from abrasion. Anti-static and anti-halation properties are bonuses. I believe the original backing of the type was a layer of colloidal silver, which was probably long ago replaced with something cheaper. So this raises a question: is the water jet situated somewhere far downstream in the process? Does it achieve its purpose by washing off a backing which has already been loosened by contact with alkaline developers? If the backing is washed off at the outset, then Mason's explanation is nonsense. David Foy "Richard Knoppow" wrote in message nk.net... wrote in message ... I've heard that Kodachrome has a "backing" that has to be removed in the processing. Is this what you are talking about below and is this "backing" light tight? In other words could you run 35mm Kodachrome through a red window Bantam camera without paper backing? Michael Scarpitti wrote: Kodachrome films have a special anti-halation backing that is NOT water-soluble (E-6 and C-41 have water-soluble antihalation layers). Kodachrome has a backing of a material called Remjet. This is a combination anti-halation and anti-static layer. Its used on several types of motion picture film although Kodak seems to be getting away from it in its newer MP films. Remjet, as the name suggests, is removed by a high pressure water jet at the entrance to the processing machine. It can be removed manually by treating the film in a mild carbonate solution and swabbing it off. If allowed to go through a processing machine which does not have means for removing it it becomes a sort of tar which is hard to get out. I don't know why this backing was used on Kodachrome. I think Kodak would like to discontinue Kodachrome but it has unique qualities which have kept it around for nearly seventy years. Home processing is not impossible but is impractical. The Kodachrome process is very complex and some of the solutions are very toxic. I have posted details of the process to the group a couple of times in the past. I don't know if the formulas for the current K-14 process are available anywhere (I suspect they are) but the preceding K-12 formulas are available in _Modern Photographic Processing_ Grant Haist for those who are curious about it. -- --- Richard Knoppow Los Angeles, CA, USA |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Kodachrome 120? | Lunaray | Medium Format Photography Equipment | 5 | February 24th 04 12:13 AM |
I'm guessing that Kodak will kill Kodachrome within the next 24 months | John Horner | Film & Labs | 17 | December 22nd 03 02:59 PM |
Q: processing Kodachrome 25 color slide to get B&W? | David Foy | Film & Labs | 10 | October 26th 03 01:56 AM |
Processing Kodachrome 64 | Larry R Harrison Jr | Film & Labs | 15 | October 26th 03 01:55 AM |
RemJet (was Q: processing Kodachrome 25 color slide to get B&W?) | David Foy | Film & Labs | 4 | September 30th 03 05:15 AM |