A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Digital Photography » Digital Photography
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Dynamic range of digital and film: new data



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51  
Old November 14th 04, 06:09 AM
Roger N. Clark (change username to rnclark)
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

wrote:
In message ,
"Roger N. Clark (change username to rnclark)"
wrote:


You might take a look at the image processing program ImagesPlus
(
http://www.mlunsold.com/ ) It works in true 16 bit, adds images
together, and can register them before adding. It also has a
lot of interesting filters and is widely used in the astronomy
community. (I have no affiliation or monetary interest with mlunsold.com).
It is what I use for all my camera statistics.
Astronomers commonly add dozens to hundreds of images together
to increase signal to noise. For example, see:
http://clarkvision.com/astro/saturn.03.02.2004
I added 99 frames of Saturn together, taken with a telephoto
lens and applied filters to increase spatial resolution.



I downloaded the demo, but the demo seemed to be restricted from doing
anything I was interested in trying, IIRC.

Does its stacking feature automatically rotate and offset individual
images, and does it use sub-pixel placement, outputting a higher-res
image?


I'm not sure about the sub-pixel placement. You could
always enlarge the image first (it does have batch
resize abilities, which is qhat I do). Send Mike (the author
of the prog) an email. He is usually pretty good about responding.
He adds features based on user requests too. I have done
planet registration as well as astrophoto shift and rotate
registration of star fields. You select one or two
areas for it to match to and it does some sort of autocorrelation
to do the alignment. It can also grade the quality of
multiple images and add them in a weighted average.

Roger

  #52  
Old November 14th 04, 06:09 AM
Roger N. Clark (change username to rnclark)
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

wrote:
In message ,
"Roger N. Clark (change username to rnclark)"
wrote:


You might take a look at the image processing program ImagesPlus
(
http://www.mlunsold.com/ ) It works in true 16 bit, adds images
together, and can register them before adding. It also has a
lot of interesting filters and is widely used in the astronomy
community. (I have no affiliation or monetary interest with mlunsold.com).
It is what I use for all my camera statistics.
Astronomers commonly add dozens to hundreds of images together
to increase signal to noise. For example, see:
http://clarkvision.com/astro/saturn.03.02.2004
I added 99 frames of Saturn together, taken with a telephoto
lens and applied filters to increase spatial resolution.



I downloaded the demo, but the demo seemed to be restricted from doing
anything I was interested in trying, IIRC.

Does its stacking feature automatically rotate and offset individual
images, and does it use sub-pixel placement, outputting a higher-res
image?


I'm not sure about the sub-pixel placement. You could
always enlarge the image first (it does have batch
resize abilities, which is qhat I do). Send Mike (the author
of the prog) an email. He is usually pretty good about responding.
He adds features based on user requests too. I have done
planet registration as well as astrophoto shift and rotate
registration of star fields. You select one or two
areas for it to match to and it does some sort of autocorrelation
to do the alignment. It can also grade the quality of
multiple images and add them in a weighted average.

Roger

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Digital quality (vs 35mm): Any real answers? Toralf 35mm Photo Equipment 274 July 30th 04 12:26 AM
Digital Imaging vs. (Digital and Film) Photography Bob Monaghan Medium Format Photography Equipment 9 June 19th 04 05:48 PM
The first film of the Digital Revolution is here.... Todd Bailey Film & Labs 0 May 27th 04 08:12 AM
Which is better? digital cameras or older crappy cameras thatuse film? Michael Weinstein, M.D. In The Darkroom 13 January 24th 04 09:51 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.