YOU CAN'T HIDE FROM THE 20D !

On Jan 25, 9:58 am, "mark_digital©" wrote:
Here is an unretouched full-size crop from the original image.
http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/73536978/original

I'll take a look if you promise you stopped imbedding virii in your pics.

? How would one do that?

The only virus in my 20D pics is a love virus. People love them!

On Thu, 25 Jan 2007 03:43:35 GMT, "Doug MacDonald"
wrote:

There's a lot of noise in those wings mate...
When you cut and past you really ought to balance the noise in the
background with the pic you put over it.

I think you are confusing butterfly scales with noise.

Nice pictures, but they seemed to have drawn the pixel peepers and
equipment worshippers out of the closet.

How about showing us what *you* can do rather than what your camera
and pricey L glass can do? :-)


Steve




On 24 Jan 2007 18:23:42 -0800, "Annika1980"
wrote:

http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/73512993/original

On Jan 28, 7:59 am, smb wrote:
Nice pictures, but they seemed to have drawn the pixel peepers and
equipment worshippers out of the closet.

Well that's kind of the point this week since I'm testing the 50 f/
1.2L. It's a new offering from Canon and so most people probably
haven't seen too many examples from it. I was a bit curious myself so
I rented one for a week to put it through it's paces.


How about showing us what *you* can do rather than what your camera
and pricey L glass can do? :-)

I'll leave it to the viewer to figure out how much is me and how much
is the equipment. All that my pics prove is what I can get out of the
equipment I use.
Someone else's results may vary.

"Annika1980" a écrit dans le message de news:
...


On Jan 28, 7:59 am, smb wrote:
Nice pictures, but they seemed to have drawn the pixel peepers and
equipment worshippers out of the closet.

Well that's kind of the point this week since I'm testing the 50 f/
1.2L. It's a new offering from Canon and so most people probably
haven't seen too many examples from it. I was a bit curious myself so
I rented one for a week to put it through it's paces.


How about showing us what *you* can do rather than what your camera
and pricey L glass can do? :-)

I'll leave it to the viewer to figure out how much is me and how much
is the equipment. All that my pics prove is what I can get out of the
equipment I use.
Someone else's results may vary.



Good answer...
Kind of a gentleman's answer.

Anyway, one can appreciate your pics without asking corny questions.

On 28 Jan 2007 09:39:01 -0800, "Annika1980"
wrote:



On Jan 28, 7:59 am, smb wrote:
Nice pictures, but they seemed to have drawn the pixel peepers and
equipment worshippers out of the closet.

Well that's kind of the point this week since I'm testing the 50 f/
1.2L. It's a new offering from Canon and so most people probably
haven't seen too many examples from it. I was a bit curious myself so
I rented one for a week to put it through it's paces.


How about showing us what *you* can do rather than what your camera
and pricey L glass can do? :-)

I'll leave it to the viewer to figure out how much is me and how much
is the equipment. All that my pics prove is what I can get out of the
equipment I use.
Someone else's results may vary.


Don't get me wrong, it's just that there are enough "Camera X
Galleries" out there that it would be refreshing to see examples of
good photography without mention of the gear. Let the pictures speak
for themselves.

Steve

"smb" wrote in message
...
On 28 Jan 2007 09:39:01 -0800, "Annika1980"
wrote:



On Jan 28, 7:59 am, smb wrote:
Nice pictures, but they seemed to have drawn the pixel peepers and
equipment worshippers out of the closet.

Well that's kind of the point this week since I'm testing the 50 f/
1.2L. It's a new offering from Canon and so most people probably
haven't seen too many examples from it. I was a bit curious myself so
I rented one for a week to put it through it's paces.


How about showing us what *you* can do rather than what your camera
and pricey L glass can do? :-)

I'll leave it to the viewer to figure out how much is me and how much
is the equipment. All that my pics prove is what I can get out of the
equipment I use.
Someone else's results may vary.


Don't get me wrong, it's just that there are enough "Camera X
Galleries" out there that it would be refreshing to see examples of
good photography without mention of the gear. Let the pictures speak
for themselves.

Steve

While I can understand your viewpoint, I'm always curious to know what
equipment was used to capture a given image. I watch a DVD, then browse the
"Making of..." section, too.

dwight

On Jan 28, 4:27 pm, smb wrote:

Don't get me wrong, it's just that there are enough "Camera X
Galleries" out there that it would be refreshing to see examples of
good photography without mention of the gear. Let the pictures speak
for themselves.

I would submit that there are plenty of those types of galleries out
there as well.
RPD is about digital photography and the equipment is a large part of
that.
Otherwise, it would just be rec.photo.