Possible to extract high resolution b/w from a raw file?

On 6/2/2011 2:51 PM, Mxsmanic wrote:
Floyd L. Davidson writes:

In order to legally use the trademark an OS has to be
certified to meet the standards set by the Open Group,
which owns the trademark.

The trademark isn't a standard. It's just a word.

A trademark (Service mark) is the right to use a word, symbol or phrase
in a given context. It is intellectual property. The owner of the
property has the right to impose legal conditions on its use by a third
party.



--
Peter

Mxsmanic wrote:
Ray Fischer writes:

Then what is the standard?

There isn't any, at least none that would be accepted by everyone.

You must be blind. (And it appears to be intensional.
Try opening your eyes and reading the writing on the
wall!)

--
Floyd L. Davidson http://www.apaflo.com/floyd_davidson
Ukpeagvik (Barrow, Alaska)

Mxsmanic wrote:
Floyd L. Davidson writes:

In order to legally use the trademark an OS has to be
certified to meet the standards set by the Open Group,
which owns the trademark.

The trademark isn't a standard. It's just a word.

Nobody said a trademark is a standard.

If you don't open your eyes, how do you expect to
see what is right in front of you?

Someone previously posted this, but take a look at

http://www.opengroup.org/platform/si...specification/

The operative specifications a

* ISO/IEC 9945
* IEEE Std 1003.1
* Single UNIX Specification.

You might be silly enough to claim that because the Open
Group owns the trademark that their specification is
arbitrary, but just how do you reconcile the
stardardization by IEEE and ISO/IEC?


--
Floyd L. Davidson http://www.apaflo.com/floyd_davidson
Ukpeagvik (Barrow, Alaska)

Mxsmanic wrote:
Ray Fischer writes:

Then what is the standard?

There isn't any,

Obviously you're wrong. There is a standard. You just don't like it.

--
Ray Fischer | Mendocracy (n.) government by lying
| The new GOP ideal

Mxsmanic wrote:
Andrew Reilly writes:

Wouldn't know. It would almost certainly have to be a version of
Minesweeper that knew how to fork(), and which could distinguish between
different-only-by-case filenames...

Or a version of Minesweeper floating on a boatload of money.

Not everything can be bought.

-Wolfgang

"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
...
[]
Essentially everything worth having can be bought.

Happiness? Good health?

David

On 2011-06-04 23:22:00 -0700, "David J Taylor"
said:

"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
...
[]
Essentially everything worth having can be bought.

Happiness? Good health?

David

I give you Howard Hughes.

--
Regards,

Savageduck

Mxsmanic wrote:
Savageduck writes:

I give you Howard Hughes.

For every Howard Hughes, there are thousands of Paris Hiltons, Donald Trumps,
and others who have lots of money and are happy in consequence. If money
didn't buy happiness, there wouldn't be so many people trying to get more of
it.

The same could be said of alcohol and other recreational drugs.

--
Chris Malcolm

Mxsmanic wrote:
Chris Malcolm writes:

The same could be said of alcohol and other recreational drugs.

Yes, except that money actually works.

If it does ... explain Howard Huges.

-Wolfgang

Mxsmanic wrote:
ASCII writes:

Are those masses trying to facilitate happiness,
or alleviate unhappiness?

Same thing.

Only if you murder your wife AND inherit her fortune.

-Wolfgang