If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#71
|
|||
|
|||
Nick Zentena wrote:
Lets be honest. Camera companies are spending no R&D dollars on film cameras. Far as I can tell, film makers aren't spending much on R&D either. When's the last time a new B&W (non c-41) film was released? P3200? What's the most recent development in color film? The last thing I can recall is Kodak MAX, but I honestly have never paid much attention to color film. There are developments in disposable cameras, and they will probably be popular until digital is cheap enough to replace them ($3 pricepoint) They sure aren't spending any ad money either. Shutting down those production lines won't do them any good. Shutting down the lines will free up capital (both money and people) that they can use for other (read digital) purposes. Bob |
#72
|
|||
|
|||
bob wrote:
Shutting down the lines will free up capital (both money and people) that they can use for other (read digital) purposes. To lose more money? The low end digital market is basically gone. Watch digital cell phones wipe out that market. Nick |
#73
|
|||
|
|||
Nick Zentena wrote:
bob wrote: Shutting down the lines will free up capital (both money and people) that they can use for other (read digital) purposes. To lose more money? The low end digital market is basically gone. Watch digital cell phones wipe out that market. Nick The plants aren't in Japan. They can layoff the workers, close the plants, and bring the managers home. Even if the managers sit idle they will loose less money than if they continue to pay workers to assemble materials that there are no buyers for. That's doubly true if they can sell the plants and some of the equipment. I'm pretty sure there is plenty of business in producing digital cameras in the future, even if it isn't in the low end. Maybe there's a Nikon brand cell phone in your future ;-) As long as they can keep working on reducing the shutter lag and improving the ISO ratings, there will continue to be an upgrade market in the advanced amateur category. Bob |
#74
|
|||
|
|||
bob wrote: Nick Zentena wrote: Lets be honest. Camera companies are spending no R&D dollars on film cameras. Far as I can tell, film makers aren't spending much on R&D either. When's the last time a new B&W (non c-41) film was released? P3200? What's the most recent development in color film? The last thing I can recall is Kodak MAX, but I honestly have never paid much attention to color film. There are developments in disposable cameras, and they will probably be popular until digital is cheap enough to replace them ($3 pricepoint) They sure aren't spending any ad money either. Shutting down those production lines won't do them any good. Shutting down the lines will free up capital (both money and people) that they can use for other (read digital) purposes. Bob I hope you all don't mind the input from an interloper, I don't do any darkroom work currently but did a fair bit of it in the early 70s. First off let me say that I would be a bit surprise if film disappears within the next 10 years, it might be hard to find places to process it but my guess is that it will be around in some form. Having said that I will also say that I don't know enough about the film business to really know what will happen. These are a few of the questions that I don't know the answers to, how small of an operation can you have and still produce high quality film that is affordable? Is the same equipment that makes print paper also used for making film or is it another whole production line? Since the high quality prints are using photographic print paper for their output it is a pretty good guess that they will be producing print paper for sometime to come. This means that at least someone will be coating paper with photosensitive emulsions in the future, this would seem to give film a good chance of surviving for some time to come. The other thing that will help keep film alive for a while is the disposable cameras, this is the only area of film sales that has not seen large drops in volume. I would expect to see the number of people doing their own photographic printing 10 years from now to be a small fraction of what it is today. Scott |
#75
|
|||
|
|||
bob wrote: Nick Zentena wrote: Lets be honest. Camera companies are spending no R&D dollars on film cameras. Far as I can tell, film makers aren't spending much on R&D either. When's the last time a new B&W (non c-41) film was released? P3200? What's the most recent development in color film? The last thing I can recall is Kodak MAX, but I honestly have never paid much attention to color film. There are developments in disposable cameras, and they will probably be popular until digital is cheap enough to replace them ($3 pricepoint) They sure aren't spending any ad money either. Shutting down those production lines won't do them any good. Shutting down the lines will free up capital (both money and people) that they can use for other (read digital) purposes. Bob I hope you all don't mind the input from an interloper, I don't do any darkroom work currently but did a fair bit of it in the early 70s. First off let me say that I would be a bit surprise if film disappears within the next 10 years, it might be hard to find places to process it but my guess is that it will be around in some form. Having said that I will also say that I don't know enough about the film business to really know what will happen. These are a few of the questions that I don't know the answers to, how small of an operation can you have and still produce high quality film that is affordable? Is the same equipment that makes print paper also used for making film or is it another whole production line? Since the high quality prints are using photographic print paper for their output it is a pretty good guess that they will be producing print paper for sometime to come. This means that at least someone will be coating paper with photosensitive emulsions in the future, this would seem to give film a good chance of surviving for some time to come. The other thing that will help keep film alive for a while is the disposable cameras, this is the only area of film sales that has not seen large drops in volume. I would expect to see the number of people doing their own photographic printing 10 years from now to be a small fraction of what it is today. Scott |
#76
|
|||
|
|||
|
#77
|
|||
|
|||
bob wrote:
.... There is no reason besides economics. My prediction is the transition will go fairly quickly, like DVD. Thom predicts Nikon and Canon will both have discontinued *all* 35mm cameras by the end of the year. If consumers aren't buying film cameras, and professionals have largely abandoned them, that leaves only the relatively low volume of the serious amateur. Will you still be able to get it? Sure. Just like BetaMax tapes. Sony only discontinued production of BetaMax recording gear a year or so ago, but in most people's minds Beta was "dead" around 1980. Bob Why have Nikon recently launched a top end 35mm SLR? How many film SLRs have Canon launched recently? Who is Thom, and why does his prediction carry so much weight? But even if the launch of new film cameras slows down, you appear to be confusing film cameras with film. There are still a lot of film users out there. And economics suggests that whilst there is a market, there will be a supplier. Steve |
#78
|
|||
|
|||
bob wrote:
.... There is no reason besides economics. My prediction is the transition will go fairly quickly, like DVD. Thom predicts Nikon and Canon will both have discontinued *all* 35mm cameras by the end of the year. If consumers aren't buying film cameras, and professionals have largely abandoned them, that leaves only the relatively low volume of the serious amateur. Will you still be able to get it? Sure. Just like BetaMax tapes. Sony only discontinued production of BetaMax recording gear a year or so ago, but in most people's minds Beta was "dead" around 1980. Bob Why have Nikon recently launched a top end 35mm SLR? How many film SLRs have Canon launched recently? Who is Thom, and why does his prediction carry so much weight? But even if the launch of new film cameras slows down, you appear to be confusing film cameras with film. There are still a lot of film users out there. And economics suggests that whilst there is a market, there will be a supplier. Steve |
#79
|
|||
|
|||
Nick Zentena wrote:
.... and falling average selling prices. Lets be honest. Camera companies are spending no R&D dollars on film cameras. They sure aren't spending any ad money either. Shutting down those production lines won't do them any good. .... But they _are_ launching new models, and they _are_ being advertised. You won't see these adverts in the mainstream press, but the specialist photography press. Its the same with B&W, but that has supposedly been dead for years. Steve |
#80
|
|||
|
|||
Nick Zentena wrote:
.... and falling average selling prices. Lets be honest. Camera companies are spending no R&D dollars on film cameras. They sure aren't spending any ad money either. Shutting down those production lines won't do them any good. .... But they _are_ launching new models, and they _are_ being advertised. You won't see these adverts in the mainstream press, but the specialist photography press. Its the same with B&W, but that has supposedly been dead for years. Steve |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
color vision spyder and print fix conclusion | william kossack | Digital Photography | 0 | January 9th 05 04:53 AM |