Don't forget to send your favorites!

On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 20:49:45 -0500, "J. Clarke"
wrote:

tony cooper wrote:
On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 16:22:49 -0800, "Bill Graham"
wrote:

I wouldn't, "Start an argument with a priest".

I would, however, bring to his/her attention that the Bible is very
probably not the, "Word of God".

Only Bill, and perhaps John Navas, would not see the conflict between
those two sentences.

Both of them could benefit from "attitude adjustments".

As the ol' saying goes, "They don't have an attitude problem, you have a
being nothing but assholes problem."

"tony cooper" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 16:22:49 -0800, "Bill Graham"
wrote:

I wouldn't, "Start an argument with a priest".

I would, however, bring to his/her attention that the Bible is very
probably not the, "Word of God".

Only Bill, and perhaps John Navas, would not see the conflict between
those two sentences.


--
Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida

Only Tony can't tell the difference between, "Start an argument with", and
"Bring to the attention of".

"J. Clarke" wrote in message
...
tony cooper wrote:
On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 16:22:49 -0800, "Bill Graham"
wrote:

I wouldn't, "Start an argument with a priest".

I would, however, bring to his/her attention that the Bible is very
probably not the, "Word of God".

Only Bill, and perhaps John Navas, would not see the conflict between
those two sentences.

Both of them could benefit from "attitude adjustments".

Does anyone know the definition of, "Confrontational"?

On Thu, 5 Nov 2009 20:38:42 -0800, "Bill Graham"
wrote:


"tony cooper" wrote in message
.. .
On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 16:22:49 -0800, "Bill Graham"
wrote:

I wouldn't, "Start an argument with a priest".

I would, however, bring to his/her attention that the Bible is very
probably not the, "Word of God".

Only Bill, and perhaps John Navas, would not see the conflict between
those two sentences.


--
Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida

Only Tony can't tell the difference between, "Start an argument with", and
"Bring to the attention of".

Sure I do. "Start an argument with" is a straight-forward and honest
statement of intent. "Bring to the attention of" is a disingenuous
opening that allows the person to feign surprise at ending up in an
argument.



--
Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida

"tony cooper" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 5 Nov 2009 20:38:42 -0800, "Bill Graham"
wrote:


"tony cooper" wrote in message
. ..
On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 16:22:49 -0800, "Bill Graham"
wrote:

I wouldn't, "Start an argument with a priest".

I would, however, bring to his/her attention that the Bible is very
probably not the, "Word of God".

Only Bill, and perhaps John Navas, would not see the conflict between
those two sentences.


--
Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida

Only Tony can't tell the difference between, "Start an argument with", and
"Bring to the attention of".

Sure I do. "Start an argument with" is a straight-forward and honest
statement of intent. "Bring to the attention of" is a disingenuous
opening that allows the person to feign surprise at ending up in an
argument.

You mean, "......that allows Tony Cooper to feign surprise at ending up in
an argument." Speak for yourself, and not for all persons. I have had many
interesting discussions with men of the cloth, which rarely ended up in
arguments.

"Bill Graham" wrote in message

"tony cooper" wrote in message
...

[...]

Sure I do. "Start an argument with" is a straight-forward and honest
statement of intent. "Bring to the attention of" is a disingenuous
opening that allows the person to feign surprise at ending up in an
argument.

You mean, "......that allows Tony Cooper to feign surprise at ending
up in an argument." Speak for yourself, and not for all persons. I
have had many interesting discussions with men of the cloth, which
rarely ended up in arguments.

Only because they're too polite to tell you what a dick you are.

"DRS" wrote in message
...
"Bill Graham" wrote in message

"tony cooper" wrote in message
...

[...]

Sure I do. "Start an argument with" is a straight-forward and honest
statement of intent. "Bring to the attention of" is a disingenuous
opening that allows the person to feign surprise at ending up in an
argument.

You mean, "......that allows Tony Cooper to feign surprise at ending
up in an argument." Speak for yourself, and not for all persons. I
have had many interesting discussions with men of the cloth, which
rarely ended up in arguments.

Only because they're too polite to tell you what a dick you are.
No, it's because, unlike you, they are, for the most part, not dumb
liberals, so I understand where they are coming from.

Bill Graham wrote:

"DRS" wrote in message
...
"Bill Graham" wrote in message

"tony cooper" wrote in message
...

[...]

Sure I do. "Start an argument with" is a straight-forward and honest
statement of intent. "Bring to the attention of" is a disingenuous
opening that allows the person to feign surprise at ending up in an
argument.

You mean, "......that allows Tony Cooper to feign surprise at ending
up in an argument." Speak for yourself, and not for all persons. I
have had many interesting discussions with men of the cloth, which
rarely ended up in arguments.

Only because they're too polite to tell you what a dick you are.
No, it's because, unlike you, they are, for the most part, not dumb
liberals, so I understand where they are coming from.

"Dumb liberals" like, say, Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, Alexander
Hamilton ...

--
Ray Fischer