If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
OnSafari wrote:
I'd like to follow up on my last email. I did find out that the RB67 takes a Polaroid back, which I like. I did not mention this, but the RB67 has bellows, which I have never used on a camera before. Is there an additional learning curve here? Thank you again, Chris Hi Chris, I use the RB67 a lot and really like it. It is suitable for any job you can imagine. Only drawback is the size and the weight. If you buy, I suggest to leave the original and go for a S or SD. The original has no securities for double exposures etc. The SD has the only advantage of a bigger throat to accommodate the 500 apo and the 75 shift. You can use all accessories and film backs on all the bodies except for the earlier mentioned lenses. The bellows does not need a learning curve. Actually it is very convenient and makes the lenses even cheaper because they don't need a focusing mechanism. It also makes it possible to come much closer without the use of extra rings. Although the early non 'C' lenses are oke, you better buy 'C' lenses. These can still be serviced and have a better coating. I'd say, go for it and never look back. Regards, Michiel Fokkema |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Hello All.
I just wanted to follow up with you all to let you know that I purchased my MF system today. I had been searching on eBay at quite a few auctions and looked on the MF marketplace as well. I had some great suggestions from you all and had some of my own ideas going in to this. In the end I went down to Charlotte Camera, my local camera store to see what they had used. Even though I live in Charlotte, I travel so often that I never actually shopped for cameras in Charlotte, and this was my first introduction to the store. From what I found out, Charlotte Camera ranks quite high in being one of the best known used camera outlets (they also sell new too). I was pleased to see that they had quite a large section of used MF cameras. In fact they had every camera that was suggested to me, so I actually got a chance to hold them all. My salesperson, Lauren was great at walking me through all the models and letting me know the strengths and weaknesses to each. In the end I purchased a Mamiya RZ67 Pro II with a 120 back, a Polaroid back, a waist-level finder and a 180mm lens. I also picked up a new Macro flash and a 300-700mm lens for my Nikon cameras. Lauren made me an excellent package price, and as they had just moved in to their new location, they had a 10% discount on all MF systems. As a result, I wound up getting a near mint (9+) RZ 67 Pro II system for less than used models are selling on eBay for. Needless to say, I am thrilled. So, thank you all again for your advice. I did check out any camera that was suggested to me, but I liked how the Mamiya was layed out, and even though it is quite heavy and large, I kept finding myself drawn to it. I'll start shooting this weekend! I very much appreciate all of you. Chris Jett www.ChrisJett.com ~Stay in Focus~ |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Great decision ! I think the RZ is really a great camera. I prefer the manual
shutters of the RB myself but in all other aspects the RB and RZ are identical. It's also good to hear about Charlotte Camera. JD - www.puresilver.org |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
If "quality" is your main concern, and if by "gallery size" you mean say
16x20 or larger prints, I think you should be looking at 6x7 systems. Unless you're planning to make square prints Hasselblad is really a 645 system (i.e. the smallest of the three "normal" MF sizes) because of the crop needed to get to rectangular prints. In the 6x7 size there's Mamiya RB/RZ which are excellent but both are massive heavy cameras intended more for the studio than the street, then there's one of the discontinued Bronica models, I forget which one but it's discontinued so I'd forget it because of potential parts problems, and Pentax 67/67II which is what I'd recommend for your intended uses - great lenses, closer to what you're used to since the camera is an overgrown 35mm camera, and very low prices to assemble a system. "OnSafari" wrote in message oups.com... Hello All. I am considering a venture in to Medium Format. I currently own a Nikon D100, F100 and N80. There are a few reasons that I want to try out MF, but the top reason is the overall quality of the image. I am looking to shoot artsy black & white street scenes and portraits with the intent of blowing them up to gallery size. That said, I am considering my options. Hasselblad has a phenominal reputation and I have been considering purchasing a used 500CM kit which has a waist-level finder, 80mm lens, 220 and a Polaroid back. I thought this was a great starting point. I do realize the added expense in the future of purchasing additional Hasselblad lenses. My main concern is quality over cost. I also considered a Mamiya 645AF, but am leaning towards the Hasselblad. Any suggestions that you can provide me would be greatly appreciated. Once again the main uses for this camera would be studio portraits, fine art images, street scenes and to a lesser degree landscapes. I would appreciate and emails. You can send these to my email address at: and respond to the group as well. Thank you in advance, Chris Jett www.chrisjett.com ~Stay In Focus~ |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
"Shelley" wrote in message
news:IbB8e.17899$ox3.15832@trnddc03... If "quality" is your main concern, and if by "gallery size" you mean say 16x20 or larger prints, I think you should be looking at 6x7 systems. Unless you're planning to make square prints Hasselblad is really a 645 system (i.e. the smallest of the three "normal" MF sizes) because of the crop needed to get to rectangular prints. In the 6x7 size there's Mamiya RB/RZ which are excellent but both are massive heavy cameras intended more for the studio than the street, then there's one of the discontinued Bronica models, I forget which one but it's discontinued so I'd forget it because of potential parts problems, and Pentax 67/67II which is what I'd recommend for your intended uses - great lenses, closer to what you're used to since the camera is an overgrown 35mm camera, and very low prices to assemble a system. If it's mostly for the studio, then the Mamiya or the Pentax, if mostly outside, then the Pentax. But if you really want to major on the street photography side, and don't mind a camera that's less versatile in the studio, I'd look at a 6x7 or 6x9 rangefinder. Mamiya 7 is the obvious new choice in that category. Other options include Plaubel Makina and various Fujicas. I have a couple of 6x9 Fujicas, the early ones with the interchangeable lenses - and they are simply superb. Even if you decide on the RB/RZ or the Pentax - both better choices if you want to do a lot in the studio, or if you are serious about landscape, you might still find a 6x7 rangefinder a nice addition for the street photography. I do like the square format too, but I use it to shoot square pictures. If I planned to shoot mostly rectangles, I'd stick to a rectangular camera - I have both, but then I sell a lot of square pictures. Peter |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 20 Apr 2005 19:45:58 +0100, "Bandicoot"
wrote: If it's mostly for the studio, then the Mamiya or the Pentax, if mostly outside, then the Pentax. But if you really want to major on the street photography side, and don't mind a camera that's less versatile in the studio, I'd look at a 6x7 or 6x9 rangefinder. You're a little late. He made his purchase several days ago, and posted about it. -- Larry |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
"pltrgyst" wrote in message
... On Wed, 20 Apr 2005 19:45:58 +0100, "Bandicoot" wrote: If it's mostly for the studio, then the Mamiya or the Pentax, if mostly outside, then the Pentax. But if you really want to major on the street photography side, and don't mind a camera that's less versatile in the studio, I'd look at a 6x7 or 6x9 rangefinder. You're a little late. He made his purchase several days ago, and posted about it. -- Larry Actually, the OP made his purchase before Shelley made the post to which I was replying - since more people than the OP may read this thread, I see no problem with Shelley's post, and hence saw none with mine. If the OP's purchase 'closed the issue' for you, then no need to read the thread any more... ;-) Peter |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
OnSafari wrote:
I do realize the added expense in the future of purchasing additional Hasselblad lenses. My main concern is quality over cost. Right. Lenses are pricey... But do you planed to buy a lot of lenses ??? 1, 2 lenses is a complete combo ! -- Daniel Rocha - Photographie http://www.monochromatique.com |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Focal plane vs. leaf shutters in MF SLRs | KM | Medium Format Photography Equipment | 724 | December 7th 04 09:58 AM |
Medium Format Neg Scanning?? | Mike in Dallas | Digital Photography | 9 | October 21st 04 07:02 PM |
A Fisheye adapter for Medium Format? | Ronin | Medium Format Photography Equipment | 8 | October 13th 04 03:32 AM |
FA: Bronica SQA 6x6 medium format camera plus prism | JCA | General Equipment For Sale | 0 | May 2nd 04 04:23 PM |
FA: Omega Rapid M (medium format camera) | Angelo P. | General Equipment For Sale | 0 | December 31st 03 10:38 PM |