If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#71
|
|||
|
|||
Mac users - be aware
On 8/6/2015 8:29 PM, Tony Cooper wrote:
On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 20:09:08 -0400, nospam wrote: In article , PeterN wrote: selling apps is big business. apps use the cloud. apps are not going away. twisting. there is no twisting. Cough! cough! take some medicine. you said 'many software publishers would like to see that happen' (quoted above), referring to users not being able to install apps. Yep! that is flat out *false*. How do you KNOW that. because i'm a software developer and know far more about what goes on in the industry than you ever will. One of your biggest problems is your total failure to distinguish fact from opinion. You have absolutely no proof of what all software developers i never said anything about all software developers. more of your lies and twists. you said 'many software developers' want it, which is totally false. it's as simple as that. The above opinions about what software developers want is based on a survey of Coach Class passengers taken by nospam during a flight to the annual Second Tier Software Developers Conference and Job Fair in Cleveland, Ohio. Actually he doesn't appear know the difference between a developer and a publisher. -- PeterN |
#72
|
|||
|
|||
Mac users - be aware
On 8/6/2015 8:36 PM, nospam wrote:
In article , Tony Cooper wrote: The above opinions about what software developers want is based on a survey of Coach Class passengers taken by nospam during a flight to the annual Second Tier Software Developers Conference and Job Fair in Cleveland, Ohio. you are truly a moron. Good answer. It really explains your indefensible position. -- PeterN |
#73
|
|||
|
|||
Mac users - be aware
In article , PeterN
wrote: you said 'many software publishers would like to see that happen' (quoted above), referring to users not being able to install apps. Yep! that is flat out *false*. How do you KNOW that. because i'm a software developer and know far more about what goes on in the industry than you ever will. One of your biggest problems is your total failure to distinguish fact from opinion. You have absolutely no proof of what all software developers i never said anything about all software developers. more of your lies and twists. you said 'many software developers' want it, which is totally false. I did not say that. you are a liar. you absolutely did say that: In article , PeterN wrote: It strikes me as being bad form to let users have physical access to their computers and even worse form to allow them permissions to install anything on them. Bring back the mainframe I say. Many software publishers would like to see that happen. Except, what you call mainframe, they call the cloud. Bring back dumb terminals. and then you confirmed it again (quoted above): you said 'many software publishers would like to see that happen' (quoted above), referring to users not being able to install apps. Yep! now you are claiming you did not. you are a liar. Do learn to read. i learned to read long ago. i also learned to catch liars long ago. |
#74
|
|||
|
|||
Mac users - be aware
In article , PeterN
wrote: Is this the same nospam who, about a few year ago, that OSX was not subject to hacker attacks. i never said anything even close to that. Wrong. it's not wrong, because i never said anything of the sort. either link to the actual post or just admit you're babbling. |
#75
|
|||
|
|||
Mac users - be aware
In article , PeterN
wrote: Actually he doesn't appear know the difference between a developer and a publisher. the difference does not matter and it's usually the same anyway. you're playing word games because you know you're full of ****. |
#76
|
|||
|
|||
Mac users - be aware
On 8/7/2015 3:41 AM, Sandman wrote:
In article , PeterN wrote: AnthonyL: It strikes me as being bad form to let users have physical access to their computers and even worse form to allow them permissions to install anything on them. Bring back the mainframe I say. PeterN: Many software publishers would like to see that happen. Except, what you call mainframe, they call the cloud. nospam: no they wouldn't. PeterN: The all knowing speaks again, for all publishers. nospam: as if you do? PeterN: Never claimed that, you proposed to speak for all. nospam: selling apps is big business. apps use the cloud. apps are not going away. PeterN: twisting. nospam: there is no twisting. you said 'many software publishers would like to see that happen' (quoted above), referring to users not being able to install apps. Yep! nospam: that is flat out *false*. How do you KNOW that. One of your biggest problems is your total failure to distinguish fact from opinion. You have absolutely no proof of what all software developers This is your claim: "Many software publishers would like to see that happen." This is nospam's response: "no they wouldn't." So you're making a claim about what "many" wants, and nospam is saying they don't, yet you are questioning his certainty but not your own. Ironic. The difference is I am stating an opinion. nospam is claiming his statement to be a fact. Ironic that you are ignoring that slight difference. Of course you wouldn't be trolling again, or would you. -- PeterN |
#77
|
|||
|
|||
Mac users - be aware
In article , PeterN
wrote: This is your claim: "Many software publishers would like to see that happen." This is nospam's response: "no they wouldn't." So you're making a claim about what "many" wants, and nospam is saying they don't, yet you are questioning his certainty but not your own. Ironic. The difference is I am stating an opinion. nospam is claiming his statement to be a fact. you're backpedalling. |
#78
|
|||
|
|||
Mac users - be aware
On 8/7/2015 1:19 PM, nospam wrote:
In article , PeterN wrote: you said 'many software publishers would like to see that happen' (quoted above), referring to users not being able to install apps. Yep! that is flat out *false*. How do you KNOW that. because i'm a software developer and know far more about what goes on in the industry than you ever will. One of your biggest problems is your total failure to distinguish fact from opinion. You have absolutely no proof of what all software developers i never said anything about all software developers. more of your lies and twists. you said 'many software developers' want it, which is totally false. I did not say that. you are a liar. you absolutely did say that: In article , PeterN wrote: It strikes me as being bad form to let users have physical access to their computers and even worse form to allow them permissions to install anything on them. Bring back the mainframe I say. Many software publishers would like to see that happen. Except, what you call mainframe, they call the cloud. Bring back dumb terminals. and then you confirmed it again (quoted above): you said 'many software publishers would like to see that happen' (quoted above), referring to users not being able to install apps. Yep! now you are claiming you did not. you are a liar. Do learn to read. i learned to read long ago. i also learned to catch liars long ago. It's obvious you do not know the difference between a software publisher and developer. Keep ranting though, that's your style. EOD -- PeterN |
#79
|
|||
|
|||
Mac users - be aware
On 8/7/2015 1:19 PM, nospam wrote:
In article , PeterN wrote: Is this the same nospam who, about a few year ago, that OSX was not subject to hacker attacks. i never said anything even close to that. Wrong. it's not wrong, because i never said anything of the sort. either link to the actual post or just admit you're babbling. So you now say. -- PeterN |
#80
|
|||
|
|||
Mac users - be aware
On 8/7/2015 1:19 PM, nospam wrote:
In article , PeterN wrote: Actually he doesn't appear know the difference between a developer and a publisher. the difference does not matter and it's usually the same anyway. you're playing word games because you know you're full of ****. Something you never do. You tried to twist, got caught, and now you accuse me of playing word games. You are pathetic -- PeterN |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Apple-Verizon's latest ingratiating, self-aware, pandering iPhone ad | Savageduck[_3_] | Digital Photography | 4 | May 14th 14 01:29 AM |
Are you aware about your health?? | [email protected] | Digital Photography | 1 | May 21st 07 06:53 PM |
ICM-aware image viewer? | [email protected] | Digital Photography | 7 | April 20th 06 07:59 AM |
ACDSee 7 ICC Aware? | Nathan Gutman | Digital Photography | 5 | January 6th 06 05:59 PM |
viewer/album software that is version aware and can tag photos? | peter | Digital Photography | 6 | August 12th 04 09:50 PM |