What's the deal with Diesel or Dustin?

"David B." "David news:hsEYD.16061$gQ1.6668
@fx01.fr7 Mon, 07 Jan 2019 08:53:32 GMT in alt.privacy.spyware,
wrote:

On 29/08/2018 07:38, Diesel wrote:
An individual who prefers to post via remailers that happily goes
by
the nym AnonCoward has some kind of issue with me (only in it's
head) and somehow thinks that by flooding various newsgroups that
I
post in with completely bull**** stories (see below) and/or
selectively taken out of context material, it can convince you to
have a problem with me as well. Ayep, It's the grade school they
don't like me and it's not okay if you don't have a problem with
me
too.

I concede that the 'AnonCoward' does get SOME things wrong about
you
but, on the whole, he's pretty accurate.

No, he isn't. And, you know that. You're perfectly okay with lieing
about me and supporting anyone else who does as well. And, that's
easy to verify too, should you try to deny it.

He sure is right about a Leopard not changing it's spots!

No, he isn't. And, quoting a section of a post that you asked me
about in email a long time ago isn't exactly being very honest of
you, either. Especially when I provided you an answer to your
question of did I write that years ago. You just can't help but lie
and besmirch me every chance you get. So, not only did you share a
piece of a post I wrote, neglecting to include the background on it,
that I provided you in email, and dropping my first, last names as
well as city and state.

You're such a dishonest **** that you neglected to mention the
section of the post you shared was written in the late 90s. As in,
1990s. You also neglected to mention that you found that post while
you were stalking me, prior to sending me your first email; trying to
'be my friend'.-- A friend as in, hacker for hire, or so you thought.
That's why you reached out to me. It was never to get help with
BugHunter, despite your intial emails implying you were emailing for
assistance and had questions about it.

How do you sleep at night being such a shady mother****er?


--
Any clod can have the facts, but having opinions is an art.

On Wed, 13 Feb 2019 23:08:51 +0000, "David B." "David
wrote:

I'm doing God's work as best I can.

That's the very same excuse the drunk down the road gave the
police after he beat and almost killed his wife.
The judge didn't accept it as proof of mental illness.
That "bad guy" is in jail.
Don't worry, you'll have your trial too, one day, if the booze
doesn't kill you.
PS I'm praying you don't die first.
HTH

https://web.archive.org/web/20190205...ks-stalker.php
[]'s

OT up. Delusions are not on topic in the original groups you
posted to.
--
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy - Google 2012

Shadow
Thu, 14 Feb 2019 00:53:08 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On Wed, 13 Feb 2019 23:08:51 +0000, "David B." "David
wrote:

I'm doing God's work as best I can.

That's the very same excuse the drunk down the road gave the
police after he beat and almost killed his wife.
The judge didn't accept it as proof of mental illness.
That "bad guy" is in jail.
Don't worry, you'll have your trial too, one day, if the
booze
doesn't kill you.
PS I'm praying you don't die first.
HTH

Either would work for me, but, I'd be pleased to see him go through a
trial and naturally, lose.


--
Optimist: Someone who doesn't know all the facts yet.

On 2/14/19 PDT 12:18 PM, Diesel wrote:
Shadow
Thu, 14 Feb 2019 00:53:08 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On Wed, 13 Feb 2019 23:08:51 +0000, "David B." "David
wrote:

I'm doing God's work as best I can.

That's the very same excuse the drunk down the road gave the
police after he beat and almost killed his wife.
The judge didn't accept it as proof of mental illness.
That "bad guy" is in jail.
Don't worry, you'll have your trial too, one day, if the
booze
doesn't kill you.
PS I'm praying you don't die first.
HTH

Either would work for me, but, I'd be pleased to see him go through a
trial and naturally, lose.

Pleased to see no cross posting. FU set

David in Devon Sat, 09 Mar 2019 10:49:30 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On 08/03/2019 16:04, Diesel wrote:
David in Devon
Fri, 08 Mar 2019 10:34:20 GMT
in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

Drank enough so that the characters on the screen are really
blurry and you can't make out the headers now? Good, drink
another bottle as fast as you possibly can, and, by all means
follow that with another.

No, not at all.

Clearly you have. You made accusations without anything to back them
up.

It looks like your 'Anonymous' friend is providing the evidence for
everyone to read on the 'alt.comp.freeware' group!

You think so? Let's go over a few of it's posts, then. I'm
grateful for the opportunity to disprove them in front of all the
viewers. G It'll also give the newbies a chance to see how you and
Anoncoward actually work, so as to be able to hone in their bull****
detection abilities that much more.

First, the MID of their post that's not accurate:

MID: ers.net
http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=155217776500

Message-ID:
References:
Injection-Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 17:04:12 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: deiselpower.eternal-september.org; posting-host="ba171807bb0f844e9d156845b16e6055";

**** end header paste

My handle is clearly misspelled in the MID and the injection line ;
because the properly spelled one is reserved and belongs to this
account. Nobody else posting through ES can make use of it. I
created the fqdn after the individual began forging other posts of
mine; only because they are a little harder to spot. The first part
of their 'posting account' doesn't match ANY of mine. As I said, a
little harder to spot, but still possible. An improperly spelled
FQDN which is used to generate the message ID? HAha, I think not.

I'm not the only one who caught the few posts the forger bothered
doing with that fqdn line, either. It went south for them almost
immediately; writing style wasn't right, which caused people to look
at headers and compare them. Oops. Proper ****ed, they be.

Anoncoward doesn't seem to realize, people can locate and read the
thread the posts are being lifted from and check for themselves, in
full context. It's not even a difficult thing to do, for christs
sake, you can do it with google! if you're too ****ing lazy to use a
real client/server configuration.

Those forged posts were all done by the person claiming to be Rijko;
it was NOT that individual, David. I know the real one, and, they
wouldn't have been so stupid as this one was with the mistakes in
the header and the writing style. The outright COPY/PASTE effort
from posts I actually did write was icing on the cake; someone else
spotted that and commented before I even had the chance to do so.
ROFL!

Here's three more claims which are complete bull****, all by the Anoncoward:

MID:
http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=153173161400
He is on probation for hosting the Melissa Virus.

MID:
http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=153173179500
He lied about not hosting Melissa. So why believe this lying
****tard when he says he was not put on probation for hosting
viruses, including Melissa? His probation period is over, but
he's been warned that if they EVER catch him doing the virus
**** again, he's toast. His next conviction will result in prison
time.

http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=150749973600
MID:
However, I do have a "friend" or two who are intimately
personally) familiar with the facts regarding his arrest
and conviction. The(y) got him. Pure and simple, they got him.

**** end three more clear examples of Anoncowards credibility going to zero.

The Anoncoward has slacked off on repeating those particular posts ever since
I opted to ask inquire about their content and provided urls as I did so, clearly
showing the claims below are 100% made up, LIES written entirely by the AnonCoward.

You remember those questions don't you David? It's okay if you
don't, I included them below. I repeat, the above four examples
posted by the Anoncoward are entirely LIES!

ALL LIES intended to besmirch and slime, used to flood various
newsgroups hundreds of times. Here's a repeat of those questions
they never could provide ANY response to:

Let's show the audience how we both know Anoncoward lied their ass off,
multiple times, about me...

If any of that was true, the following couldn't be (yet, it is):

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Melissa_(computer_virus)

David Smith was fuxored in March of 1999, and they came to see him
April 1st, 1999. He pleaded guilty and was sentenced on December
10th, 1999. Remember those dates, they're important.

Don't trust wikipedia? That's okay, there's also this:

https://www.justice.gov/archive/crim...elissaSent.htm

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=toadie+virus
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=irok+virus

The Toadie family:

07/05/1999 05:24 PM 18,936 TOAD10.ZIP
07/28/1999 10:41 PM 19,619 TOAD11.ZIP
08/17/1999 04:01 PM 28,903 TOAD12.ZIP
08/27/1999 01:33 PM 20,803 TOAD12B.ZIP

The IRoK family:

02/19/2000 07:50 PM 16,579 IROK10.ZIP
02/28/2000 10:30 PM 10,737 IROK11.ZIP
03/08/2000 11:35 PM 20,400 IROK11A.ZIP
03/30/2000 10:27 PM 20,445 IROK11B.ZIP
06/04/2000 04:10 PM 18,801 IROK11C.ZIP

I went ahead and asked the following questions.
Obviously, the AnonCoward isn't going to be able to respond
to them due to the fact the entire story they wrote concerning
my arrest, conviction, resulting probation, etc is entirely,
made up and completely untrue.

Question #1:
If I was arrested for hosting the Melissa virus, why was my
website allowed to remain online?

Question #2:
Why wasn't I previously arrested for hosting other viruses?

Question #3:
Why after serving probation for having hosted the Melissa virus
was I allowed to write and publish nine additional viruses on my
website?

Question #4:
When all nine of my viruses, written after the author of the
Melissa virus was busted went wild, wasn't I arrested for any of
them?

Question #5:
Why wasn't I arrested when Sophos confirmed the Toadie virus,
which was known to be have been written by me, infected and
brought to it's knees a major client of theres one particular
weekend?

Question #6:
When the Toadie virus went wild and was being discussed on pegasus
mailing lists and usenet newsgroups, why wasn't I arrested?

Question #7:
When Toadie (or Irok) were being discussed on alt.comp.virus and I
was responding to various queries, concerns, wasn't I arrested for
having written and hosted them? It was obvious I was the author of
both families, I took full credit for both families each time they
came up in alt.comp.virus

0wn your totally bull**** stories, Anoncoward. Admit you made it all
up, that you lied about the entire arrest, probation, etc story. The
whole nine yards. You don't personally know anybody familiar with
any so called arrest and conviction because no such thing took
place. And, I've provided urls that directly support what I wrote
and completely prove without any ****ing doubt that you've been
lying about the entire thing from the first post about it.


That was fun. BIG SMILE You've once again been caught showing
support of a known liar, David. That's two you've made friends with
at some point now. Pcbutts and Anoncoward. Neither of which have a
very good record of being truthful concerning anything they've
written or posted online.

Wait, I've got one more. ROFL!!! it's claimed that kim Neely
interviewed me, but anyone can see by reading the article, my
interview haha, consisted of her copying things I wrote on usenet. I
provided her no interview. Hence, the slime writeup about me;
consisting once again, of things things I posted to usenet and some
replies written to me on usenet. I don't know where Anoncoward
thinks an interview takes place, because Kim is honest enough in the
article to state it's a post, not something I wrote to her, not
something I discussed with her. Still, slime article though.

And that's because I forced her offline for a short period of time
and supposedly caused her to lose some typing time on an unsaved
article. I don't personally believe that to be true, who uses a word
processor (even then) that wasn't autosaving every few mins and/or
didn't have some recovery option in the event your power flaked out?

In any event, she should have left without requiring we KB and/or
opt for option #2 (weapons deployment, lolz)

When she returned, a short time later, I told her to stay out of
that particular channel or the next option wasn't as nice. She
complied and what you read in her article was her response to the
way she felt I treated her. I wasn't itching for any spotlight and
neither was anyone else, aside from Opic. None of us wanted her in
channel and multiple people asked her nicely to leave. When she
wouldn't, I take full responsibility for the malformed packet which
caused her computers Operating System to crash when trying to
process it on her end. She was in a room with Vx and other Hacker
types, what did she think was going to happen? You'll leave one way
or another if you have to be asked to do so. It's best you comply,
the first time you're asked or told.

It's impossible to tell which real-life person actually MAKES the
posts I read on Usenet.

No, it's not.

It is for me. :-( I've not yet learned how to send control messages.

Almost all things are for you. That's what you get for years of
extensive drinking, David.

I expect YOU get somewhat confused too.

Nope, I don't. I understand how it works.

Maybe I'll get to know before I fall off my perch. ;-)

Not at the rate you're going. In the mean time, enjoy this reply. I
enjoyed writing it.


--
You don't need to bring your adversaries to their knees, just to their senses.