A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Digital Photography » Digital Photography
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Back in Black



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 7th 09, 05:49 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
Dudley Hanks[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 629
Default Back in Black

The latest on-going attempt to perfect my portrait technique...

Portrait:
http://www.photography.dudley-hanks....1-bw-small.jpg (BW,
quick loading)
http://www.photography.dudley-hanks....rtrait1-bw.jpg (BW, full
size)
http://www.photography.dudley-hanks....lour-small.jpg
(colour, quick loading)
http://www.photography.dudley-hanks....it1-colour.jpg
(colour, full size)
http://www.photography.dudley-hanks..../Portrait1.cr2 (original RAW
image)

I think both the subject lighting and the DOF should be fairly good in this
one, but I'm wondering how the background appears. Does it look
artificially dark? Distracting?

It was just taken in my livingroom, in the middle of the afternoon. I
wanted to both blur and darken the background so that it wouldn't be an
issue.

What do you think?

Take Care,
Dudley


  #2  
Old April 7th 09, 06:23 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
Savageduck
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 724
Default Back in Black

On 2009-04-07 09:49:49 -0700, "Dudley Hanks"
said:

The latest on-going attempt to perfect my portrait technique...

Portrait:
http://www.photography.dudley-hanks....1-bw-small.jpg (BW,
quick loading)
http://www.photography.dudley-hanks....rtrait1-bw.jpg (BW, full
size)
http://www.photography.dudley-hanks....lour-small.jpg
(colour, quick loading)
http://www.photography.dudley-hanks....it1-colour.jpg
(colour, full size)
http://www.photography.dudley-hanks..../Portrait1.cr2 (original RAW
image)

I think both the subject lighting and the DOF should be fairly good in this
one, but I'm wondering how the background appears. Does it look
artificially dark? Distracting?

It was just taken in my livingroom, in the middle of the afternoon. I
wanted to both blur and darken the background so that it wouldn't be an
issue.

What do you think?

Take Care,
Dudley



Hi Dudley,

Well I think you got things right with this shot. I found both B&W and
colour to be efective and pretty good.

Nice work.
--
Regards,
Savageduck

  #3  
Old April 7th 09, 06:34 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
Dudley Hanks[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 629
Default Back in Black


"Savageduck" wrote in message
news:2009040710233479149-savageduck@savagenet...
On 2009-04-07 09:49:49 -0700, "Dudley Hanks"
said:

The latest on-going attempt to perfect my portrait technique...

Portrait:
http://www.photography.dudley-hanks....1-bw-small.jpg
(BW,
quick loading)
http://www.photography.dudley-hanks....rtrait1-bw.jpg (BW,
full
size)
http://www.photography.dudley-hanks....lour-small.jpg
(colour, quick loading)
http://www.photography.dudley-hanks....it1-colour.jpg
(colour, full size)
http://www.photography.dudley-hanks..../Portrait1.cr2 (original
RAW
image)

I think both the subject lighting and the DOF should be fairly good in
this
one, but I'm wondering how the background appears. Does it look
artificially dark? Distracting?

It was just taken in my livingroom, in the middle of the afternoon. I
wanted to both blur and darken the background so that it wouldn't be an
issue.

What do you think?

Take Care,
Dudley



Hi Dudley,

Well I think you got things right with this shot. I found both B&W and
colour to be efective and pretty good.

Nice work.
--
Regards,
Savageduck


Thanks, SD, it's slowly coming back. Although, I'm finding that there are
substantial differences from how my old lenses worked on my film cameras.

For instance, my much maligned 50mm f/1.8 lens which I barely used for film
turns out to be a nice portrait lens, clocking in at around 80mm effective
focal length. Ditto for my old 28mm - 80mm f/3.5 - 5.6 multipurpose zoom.
At it's mid-point, the latter lens is about 50mm f/4, which worked quite
well for this portrait.

Still, I hope I can find a way to get a bit more control on DOF so that I
can take advantage of the really narrow DOF of the 50mm lens at wide
apertures.

Take Care,
Dudley


  #4  
Old April 7th 09, 07:47 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
GregS[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 158
Default Back in Black

In article NuLCl.21897$PH1.7229@edtnps82, "Dudley Hanks" wrote:
The latest on-going attempt to perfect my portrait technique...

Portrait:
http://www.photography.dudley-hanks....1-bw-small.jpg (BW,
quick loading)
http://www.photography.dudley-hanks....rtrait1-bw.jpg (BW, full
size)
http://www.photography.dudley-hanks....lour-small.jpg
(colour, quick loading)
http://www.photography.dudley-hanks....it1-colour.jpg
(colour, full size)
http://www.photography.dudley-hanks..../Portrait1.cr2 (original RAW
image)

I think both the subject lighting and the DOF should be fairly good in this
one, but I'm wondering how the background appears. Does it look
artificially dark? Distracting?

It was just taken in my livingroom, in the middle of the afternoon. I
wanted to both blur and darken the background so that it wouldn't be an
issue.

What do you think


I find the background annoying as well as the foreground. Trying to read the shirt.
Too much darkness under eyebrows. Shadow from hair.

greg
  #5  
Old April 7th 09, 08:01 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
Dudley Hanks[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 629
Default Back in Black


"GregS" wrote in message
...
In article NuLCl.21897$PH1.7229@edtnps82, "Dudley Hanks"
wrote:
The latest on-going attempt to perfect my portrait technique...

Portrait:
http://www.photography.dudley-hanks....1-bw-small.jpg
(BW,
quick loading)
http://www.photography.dudley-hanks....rtrait1-bw.jpg (BW, full
size)
http://www.photography.dudley-hanks....lour-small.jpg
(colour, quick loading)
http://www.photography.dudley-hanks....it1-colour.jpg
(colour, full size)
http://www.photography.dudley-hanks..../Portrait1.cr2 (original
RAW
image)

I think both the subject lighting and the DOF should be fairly good in
this
one, but I'm wondering how the background appears. Does it look
artificially dark? Distracting?

It was just taken in my livingroom, in the middle of the afternoon. I
wanted to both blur and darken the background so that it wouldn't be an
issue.

What do you think


I find the background annoying as well as the foreground. Trying to read
the shirt.
Too much darkness under eyebrows. Shadow from hair.

greg


the background. Is it the darkness which is annoying, or the blurred
artifacts?

the T-shirt. I just snagged my daughter to test the configuration, so
I'm not too worried about her wardrobe. If I were doing ad copy, that would
change.

shadows. I tend to like shadows, so they've always been a part of my
work. I find that shadows do a lot to establish a particular mood or model
facial features. However, like anything, they can reach a point where
they're excessive. For this shot, I took a number of different pics at a
variety of lighting levels. My daughter, the subject, liked this one the
best. (I guess she inherited a bit of my likes and dislikes...)

Still, I'll wait to see what others say before I decide whether to lighten
up the shadowy areas.

Thanks for the feedback. It gives me something to work on.

Take Care,
Dudley


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Leica Camera back in the black! Tony Polson 35mm Photo Equipment 21 December 1st 07 10:47 AM
Leica Camera back in the black! Tony Polson Digital SLR Cameras 22 December 1st 07 10:47 AM
Black and white portrait black bg beeo Photographing People 5 February 21st 07 03:49 AM
Little Black Dot On Pix Logan Spitznauer Digital Photography 8 April 4th 05 04:02 PM
Epson 1290S - Black isn't black Chris Gilbert Digital Photography 17 August 21st 04 07:27 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.