If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Don't forget to send your favorites!
Annika1980 wrote:
But you are correct about the cheerleaders. I have learned that besides posting Bible verses on banners one of the other long held traditions at that school is cheerleaders getting pregnant. By good Christian boys, no doubt. I always find it ironic that "Right to Life" anti-abortion Christians also don't want frank sex education in schools and especially not discussion of effective birth control beyond abstinence. Abstinence is 100% effective to be sure, except when it isn't practiced. Mother nature has not equipped teenagers with a strong ability to overcome natural urges. The tiny amount of brain power left when they're horny is just enough to put on a condom. Here kids can get condoms openly - some pharmacies give them out for free to teens. School health teachers/nurses give them out on demand. (I do remember a couple girls suddenly switching schools back in the day ....) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Don't forget to send your favorites!
"Alan Browne" wrote in message ... Annika1980 wrote: But you are correct about the cheerleaders. I have learned that besides posting Bible verses on banners one of the other long held traditions at that school is cheerleaders getting pregnant. By good Christian boys, no doubt. I always find it ironic that "Right to Life" anti-abortion Christians also don't want frank sex education in schools and especially not discussion of effective birth control beyond abstinence. Abstinence is 100% effective to be sure, ... Oh I dunno. Ask Mary... (or Joseph) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Don't forget to send your favorites!
Jeff R. wrote:
"Alan Browne" wrote in message ... Annika1980 wrote: But you are correct about the cheerleaders. I have learned that besides posting Bible verses on banners one of the other long held traditions at that school is cheerleaders getting pregnant. By good Christian boys, no doubt. I always find it ironic that "Right to Life" anti-abortion Christians also don't want frank sex education in schools and especially not discussion of effective birth control beyond abstinence. Abstinence is 100% effective to be sure, ... Oh I dunno. Ask Mary... (or Joseph) The greatest cuckold? Anyone who believes that story really needs a does of objectivity. But even the most deeply bathed in the blood Baptist would not suspect God of impregnating their precious little virgin. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Don't forget to send your favorites!
"Alan Browne" wrote in message ... Jeff R. wrote: Abstinence is 100% effective to be sure, ... Oh I dunno. Ask Mary... (or Joseph) The greatest cuckold? Anyone who believes that story really needs a does of objectivity. But even the most deeply bathed in the blood Baptist would not suspect God of impregnating their precious little virgin. Yet even that -parthenogenesis- is conceivably ( sorry - :-| ) one of the easist to believe and, maybe, more likely of the necessary beliefs. Heck - I talk to the reptiles in my backyard, and they regularly reply in very eloquent hisses. What was this thread about? -- Jeff R. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Don't forget to send your favorites!
Jeff R. wrote:
"Alan Browne" wrote in message ... Jeff R. wrote: Abstinence is 100% effective to be sure, ... Oh I dunno. Ask Mary... (or Joseph) The greatest cuckold? Anyone who believes that story really needs a does of objectivity. But even the most deeply bathed in the blood Baptist would not suspect God of impregnating their precious little virgin. Yet even that -parthenogenesis- is conceivably ( sorry - :-| ) one of the easist to believe and, maybe, more likely of the necessary beliefs. Surely. But in the time since it would likely have occurred numerous times. Has it? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Don't forget to send your favorites!
"Alan Browne" wrote in message ... Jeff R. wrote: Yet even that -parthenogenesis- is conceivably ( sorry - :-| ) one of the easist to believe and, maybe, more likely of the necessary beliefs. Surely. But in the time since it would likely have occurred numerous times. Has it? I think so. I *cannot* believe that some of the mothers I see with kids in tow have *ever* had sex. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Don't forget to send your favorites!
On 2009-10-31 15:43:57 -0700, "Jeff R." said:
"Alan Browne" wrote in message ... Jeff R. wrote: Yet even that -parthenogenesis- is conceivably ( sorry - :-| ) one of the easist to believe and, maybe, more likely of the necessary beliefs. Surely. But in the time since it would likely have occurred numerous times. Has it? I think so. I *cannot* believe that some of the mothers I see with kids in tow have *ever* had sex. Some of them didn't. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Invitro_fertilization -- Regards, Savageduck |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Don't forget to send your favorites!
Savageduck wrote:
On 2009-10-31 15:43:57 -0700, "Jeff R." said: "Alan Browne" wrote in message ... Jeff R. wrote: Yet even that -parthenogenesis- is conceivably ( sorry - :-| ) one of the easist to believe and, maybe, more likely of the necessary beliefs. Surely. But in the time since it would likely have occurred numerous times. Has it? I think so. I *cannot* believe that some of the mothers I see with kids in tow have *ever* had sex. Some of them didn't. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Invitro_fertilization Doesn't obviate sex. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Don't forget to send your favorites!
On 2009-11-01 07:13:14 -0800, Alan Browne
said: Savageduck wrote: On 2009-10-31 15:43:57 -0700, "Jeff R." said: "Alan Browne" wrote in message ... Jeff R. wrote: Yet even that -parthenogenesis- is conceivably ( sorry - :-| ) one of the easist to believe and, maybe, more likely of the necessary beliefs. Surely. But in the time since it would likely have occurred numerous times. Has it? I think so. I *cannot* believe that some of the mothers I see with kids in tow have *ever* had sex. Some of them didn't. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Invitro_fertilization Doesn't obviate sex. It does if you use the cruder definition of sex as actual coitus, as opposed to fertilization and cell division. Especially since the female in this case wouldn't even have to meet the sperm donor, let alone be intimate. I doubt many men would call invitro, without penetration, sex. Let's see you sit back and be gratified by that? -- Regards, Savageduck |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Don't forget to send your favorites!
"Savageduck" wrote in message news:2009110108235680278-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom... On 2009-11-01 07:13:14 -0800, Alan Browne said: Savageduck wrote: On 2009-10-31 15:43:57 -0700, "Jeff R." said: "Alan Browne" wrote in message ... Jeff R. wrote: Yet even that -parthenogenesis- is conceivably ( sorry - :-| ) one of the easist to believe and, maybe, more likely of the necessary beliefs. Surely. But in the time since it would likely have occurred numerous times. Has it? I think so. I *cannot* believe that some of the mothers I see with kids in tow have *ever* had sex. Some of them didn't. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Invitro_fertilization Doesn't obviate sex. It does if you use the cruder definition of sex as actual coitus, as opposed to fertilization and cell division. Especially since the female in this case wouldn't even have to meet the sperm donor, let alone be intimate. I doubt many men would call invitro, without penetration, sex. Let's see you sit back and be gratified by that? -- No "after" cigarette either. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Don't forget to send your favorites! | Alan Browne | Digital Photography | 1 | October 30th 09 01:12 PM |
Don't forget to send your favorites! | Alan Browne | Digital SLR Cameras | 1 | October 30th 09 01:12 PM |
Don't forget to send your favorites! | Alan Browne | 35mm Photo Equipment | 0 | October 29th 09 08:30 PM |