If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Consider sticking with your Hassie and scanning negs with a good scanner.
You might like this method of going digital. If you like digital after that, I hope you'll consider Canon before you commit to a Nikon. "Gregory Blank" wrote in message ... In article .com, "tangent" wrote: Greg, you're a sharp man. I was going to swap from Nikon to Canon because they were leading the digital race, but to sell all of my favourite lenses and find new ones when 6 months later....who knows? Meanwhile I pay the mortgage with 6x4.5 Velvia. I wish it was 6x7. (my 6x6 Bronica EC is ready for the bin) but I bought the camera cheap from a starving photographer, there's plenty of them about. By nature I think we photographers like new gadgets, we also second guess ourselves a lot in trying to decide what equipment will make us great or at least known. I remember an article a while back that said in essence, would you rather buy a brand new camera that might take up to 5 years to pay for or go someplace great and stay a week each year of those 5 years creating the very images that "WILL" make you known. Mind you I am not trying to influence your choice, but before consider move from shooting MF completely there would have to be a $3k digital SLR able to shoot 14MP at least and it should be full featured and lighter than my Bronica 6x6. Its a little ways off. But I don't know whether I would get rid of paid for equipment,....depends on whether I could sell it at a good enough price I guess. Thats not to say you can't buy something like a D70 and use those lenses. -- LF Website @ http://members.verizon.net/~gregoryblank "To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public."--Theodore Roosevelt, May 7, 1918 |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
I'm stoked (Australian for happy) I have a fantastic looking portrait i
took on 120 that just looks awesome. It's on a very high gsm laminate stock cover of a new magazine. Then I look inside and there's some half decent shots, but taken digitally... , even the journo's now understand and say that the digi shots "..stand out like dogs balls." (another Aussie expression) I don't think they mean they stand out in a good way. Go the hassy mate, if they want digi, they deserve digi, but at least show them how good a 120 velvia50 can scan. Asking a photographer to use digital is like asking a chef to use a packet mix. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How to Buy a Digital Camera | [email protected] | Digital Photography | 6 | January 18th 05 10:01 PM |
How should I permanently store digital photographs? | Bill Hilton | Digital Photography | 182 | January 3rd 05 03:21 PM |
NYT article - GPS tagging of digital photos | Alan Browne | Digital Photography | 4 | December 22nd 04 07:36 AM |
Digital Imaging vs. (Digital and Film) Photography | Bob Monaghan | Medium Format Photography Equipment | 9 | June 19th 04 05:48 PM |
Which is better? digital cameras or older crappy cameras thatuse film? | Michael Weinstein, M.D. | In The Darkroom | 13 | January 24th 04 09:51 PM |