If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
How would you crop this?
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
How would you crop this?
223rem wrote: http://i11.tinypic.com/43785ts.jpg Depends on what you're trying to show.. I'd get rid of the bottom foreground.. All that grass is unappealing and unnecessary.. And it makes the picture boring. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
How would you crop this?
"223rem" wrote in message ups.com... http://i11.tinypic.com/43785ts.jpg Hi! I suppose, there's a way of doing it. I did try it. But to tell you the truth, there isn't much interest in that scenery. I did a 4 x 6, but it begs for a point of interest. As it is, whatever you try, it is a mishmash... I wonder why you would want to crop this? I would have shelved that photo myself. Anyway, there's my crack at it ;-) http://celestart.com/images/publiques/crop.jpg Marcel |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
How would you crop this?
223rem wrote:
http://i11.tinypic.com/43785ts.jpg Open the file, Select All | Edit Clear would be the place to start with that one. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
How would you crop this?
223rem wrote:
http://i11.tinypic.com/43785ts.jpg Very little to work with, frankly. The tree in the middle is a problem... I cropped it like this, but there really isn't much interest here. Cropping is a nice option to have, but you've still got to "design" the scene a bit in terms of the perspective/vantage point you initially choose. Here's what I'd probably crop it to: http://upload.pbase.com/image/69564691/original -- Images (Plus Snaps & Grabs) by MarkČ at: www.pbase.com/markuson |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
How would you crop this?
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
How would you crop this?
Thanks. Not bad at all! As to the reason for taking this shot: I liked
the contrast between the colorful "rural" foreground and the foggy urban background |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
How would you crop this?
frederick wrote:
223rem wrote: http://i11.tinypic.com/43785ts.jpg Open the file, Select All | Edit Clear would be the place to start with that one. That's a little more extreme than this, which will get you an 8x10-proportioned print of dubious quality: http://www.fototime.com/F569F2CA79B83C2/orig.jpg The photo isn't much good as originally submitted, and I don't see a way to improve it much, even though there are some potentially interesting elements. What I see in this butchering is a contrast between the traditional steeple, whose origin may have been centuries in the past, and the new and striking bridge-cum-freeway off there in the haze. I think a longer lens, a viewpoint moved to the left, and framing that eliminated the foreground tree and everything other than the steeple and bridge/road might have had some potential. We might never know. Ah, well. So many perceptions, so little time to record them. -- Frank ess (Do you think the 'e-consonant-e' in their names contributes to the way Frederick and the Jeremies comport themselves?) |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
How would you crop this?
Annika1980 wrote: http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/69565598 I think I'm with you on this one. When I looked at it, that's about what I thought. I think that little pine in the middle has to go to make it much more interesting. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
How would you crop this?
Frank ess wrote:
frederick wrote: 223rem wrote: http://i11.tinypic.com/43785ts.jpg Open the file, Select All | Edit Clear would be the place to start with that one. That's a little more extreme than this, which will get you an 8x10-proportioned print of dubious quality: http://www.fototime.com/F569F2CA79B83C2/orig.jpg The photo isn't much good as originally submitted, and I don't see a way to improve it much, even though there are some potentially interesting elements. What I see in this butchering is a contrast between the traditional steeple, whose origin may have been centuries in the past, and the new and striking bridge-cum-freeway off there in the haze. I think a longer lens, a viewpoint moved to the left, and framing that eliminated the foreground tree and everything other than the steeple and bridge/road might have had some potential. We might never know. Ah, well. So many perceptions, so little time to record them. I'm not normally so straight to the point - and don't have a ticket on my own images. But a dull image taken on a dull day of a dull subject really doesn't do it for me. I was going to get smart-arsed and suggest cropping to a single pixel of a colour that I liked, but I couldn't even find that in the image. Your crop is an improvement - perhaps it would be better with 3:2 ratio and a little more to the right of the bridge shown. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Will 1.x Crop Cameras Go the Way of the Betamax? | [email protected] | Digital SLR Cameras | 10 | September 7th 06 05:02 PM |
2X or 1.4X converters on DSLRs, and the 'crop factor' | Phil Stripling | Digital Photography | 8 | February 20th 05 05:46 AM |
Equivalent focal lengths and crop factors... | Will D. | Digital SLR Cameras | 66 | January 7th 05 06:44 AM |
EOS 20D...1.6x Crop Factor...Do you actually see it while shooting? | Jay Beckman | Digital SLR Cameras | 42 | January 5th 05 10:57 AM |