A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Digital Photography » Digital Photography
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

NYT article - GPS tagging of digital photos



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 16th 04, 08:46 PM
Alan Browne
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default NYT article - GPS tagging of digital photos

The idea is not exacly fresh, and has been discussed in both NG's. I myself
thought of this (and others did too) back in the late 80's before GPS had a user
friendly constellation (or indeed before cheap receivers were available). [Then
the idea would have been to 'stamp' the negative/slide with the lat/long,
similar to the date marking systems].

One item I think would be useful would be to add the heading (direction the
camera is pointing) to the tags. This would of course require a heading sensor,
perhaps attached to the base of the camera (mag+gyro). Or perhaps simply
recording the GPS TRK, and the operator has to take care to move in the
direction of the scene prior to taking the photo. The focus distance is already
a tagged item.

It occurs to me that in digital systems with serial data interfaces (USB,
Firewire, other) a firmware upgrade would be all that is neccesary to retrofit
the capability of Rx'ing GPS data.

Anyway, good reading.

Cheers,
Alan
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


December 16, 2004
Digital Bread Crumbs for Your Photos
By AARON WEISS
New York Times

WHEN you release the shutter on a digital camera, it records more than just Aunt
Millie's toothy smile. With each photograph, the camera attaches descriptive
data - information like date and time, make and model, white balance settings
and whether the flash was used. Among the 300 or more types of data that can be
attached are Global Positioning System coordinates, pinpointing where the
photograph was taken.

Most digital cameras cannot be connected to a G.P.S. receiver, so they cannot
automatically tag images with coordinates. But interest in the combination is
growing.

When Frederik Ramm, a software engineer in Karlsruhe, Germany, strapped a
digital camera and separate G.P.S. receiver to his car and drove around northern
Scotland, he posted his results to the Web in the form of a geographically
navigable travelogue.

"I found myself driving just because I wanted to know what a certain road would
be like, what views it would offer," Mr. Ramm said. "I first thought of a way to
mount the camera inside, then of shooting photos while driving."

Using the G.P.S. receiver, he added, "seemed like the logical next step."

Visitors to Mr. Ramm's site can view his photos moving in any direction, or
watch an automated slide show retracing his journey in its original sequence.

Geocoding digital photos is catching on beyond fancy vacation slide shows.
Relating pictures to precise locations has obvious applications for
archaeologists and cartographers, but also for real estate agents compiling
listings and law enforcement officers conducting investigations.

Researchers can measure population distributions of plant species with highly
accurate photojournals, or document the changing landscape of the California
coastline, as Kenneth and Gabrielle Adelman have done with a helicopter, a
digital camera, a G.P.S. receiver and a laptop computer.

As part of an effort called the California Coastal Records Project
(www.californiacoastline.org), Mr. Adelman has taken more than 20,000 aerial
photographs of the coast (except for a restricted area around Vandenberg Air
Force Base near Santa Barbara) from a helicopter flown by his wife.
"Photographing particular parts of the coast for the Sierra Club led to the
idea," he said. "It was the digital photography and the G.P.S. interface that
made it practical."

Mr. Adelman uses a Nikon D1x digital camera, a high-end professional digital
model and one of the few that can directly communicate with a G.P.S. receiver.
Currently available for around $3,500 (without the receiver, which can run a
couple of hundred dollars more), the six-megapixel D1x is not an inexpensive
solution to combining location information with digital photography. Nor is its
newer replacement model, the 12-megapixel Nikon D2x (at a cost expected to be
near $5,000), which Mr. Adelman plans to evaluate when it is released early next
year.

A less expensive option is the three-megapixel Ricoh Caplio Pro G3, which has an
optional integrated G.P.S. receiver and costs $1,000 for the bundle.

Aside from the limited choice and high cost of G.P.S.-ready digital cameras, the
physical tethers can also be unwieldy, complicating mobile operations. More
often, geocoding enthusiasts favor the lower-tech solution used by Mr. Ramm -
simply traveling with both their preferred digital camera and an inexpensive
G.P.S. receiver, separate and unconnected.

Small G.P.S. receivers such as the hand-held Garmin eTrex series ($110 to $250)
or wris****ch-based Forerunner series ($80 to $120) will record positions in a
track log, updated at frequent intervals for up to several hours or more
depending on the model. Because the digital camera records the date and time
with each picture, as does the G.P.S. with each track point, the two can be
compared later to produce G.P.S. coordinates for each photo.

A variety of software packages can download the track log from the G.P.S.
receiver and apply the G.P.S. coordinates to the photo metadata - in effect
retroactively tagging the pictures just as the expensive cameras do in real
time. Free software such as StuffWare Photo Studio, World Wide Media Exchange
Utilities, and OziPhotoTool can all update photo tags with track logs from
popular G.P.S. receivers.

Once G.P.S. data has been tagged to digital photos, commercial software like
G.P.S. Photo-Link ($229) and TopoFusion ($40) can generate maps using
topographic or aerial data. With a photo record superimposed on a world map, you
can quickly and easily relive a travel journey, see the distribution of photo
subjects or visualize a historical record.

In the near future, more digital cameras will come with wireless Bluetooth
capability, allowing them to communicate directly with Bluetooth-enabled G.P.S.
receivers for instant geocoding with no wires.

Mr. Ramm predicts the trend will evolve both "from the bottom end of image
quality, driven by mobile phones that are already commonly equipped with a
camera and sometimes with G.P.S.," and "from the top of the quality scale, where
digital cameras will be hooked to notebooks for immediate image processing."

Indeed, Mr. Adelman is already considering replacing his current setup with a
higher-quality medium-format camera without direct G.P.S. input. But with it he
plans to have a computer that can later match the G.P.S. data against the time
stamps in the images.

END
  #2  
Old December 17th 04, 12:41 AM
Reg
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Alan Browne" wrote

The idea is not exacly fresh, and has been discussed in both NG's.

I myself
thought of this (and others did too) back in the late 80's before

GPS had a user
friendly constellation (or indeed before cheap receivers were

available). [Then
the idea would have been to 'stamp' the negative/slide with the

lat/long,
similar to the date marking systems].


I already do this. I have recently taken many pictures of my local
village and the W.W.II local airfield.

I use my eMap and Casio watch built-in compass to mark position and
direction. Slow but a much better historical record.

Reg.

  #3  
Old December 17th 04, 12:41 AM
Reg
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Alan Browne" wrote

The idea is not exacly fresh, and has been discussed in both NG's.

I myself
thought of this (and others did too) back in the late 80's before

GPS had a user
friendly constellation (or indeed before cheap receivers were

available). [Then
the idea would have been to 'stamp' the negative/slide with the

lat/long,
similar to the date marking systems].


I already do this. I have recently taken many pictures of my local
village and the W.W.II local airfield.

I use my eMap and Casio watch built-in compass to mark position and
direction. Slow but a much better historical record.

Reg.

  #4  
Old December 22nd 04, 04:20 AM
Scott Evans
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I just recently used my GPS...to do something similar. The model I use
Garmin Vista...has a built in compass...and therefore if you ARE standing
stationary...it will still give you data on what direction you are
pointing...or the camera if it was attached to it.

"Juergen Nieveler" wrote in message
. ..
Alan Browne wrote:

One item I think would be useful would be to add the heading
(direction the camera is pointing) to the tags. This would of course
require a heading sensor, perhaps attached to the base of the camera
(mag+gyro).


I've had the same idea some time ago. With exact position and heading
added to the pictures, and a large enough collection of pictures of a
certain area (taken from different angles), you could easily build a 3-
dimensional model of that area.

I've once tested a software that allowed you to manually match several
pictures to a 3-dimensional model ("Canoma", IIRC, BICBW), but it would
be much easier if all the position data would be in the pictures.

Juergen Nieveler
--
Officer: 'Why did you shoot that terrorist 27 times?'
SAS Trooper's reply: 'I ran out of bullets, sir'



  #5  
Old December 22nd 04, 07:36 AM
btooth
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


imagine the security issue though. as many pics are shared/published
online knowingly or not, we need to make sure that the photographer and
the subjects knows that their location is being recorded.

"look, this guy has a nice stereo system." "oh yeah, they are located
in xxx.xxxx, let's drive the truck over."


--
btooth
brought to you by http://www.wifi-forum.com/

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Digital preservation article LR Kalajainen In The Darkroom 2 November 11th 04 04:21 PM
Digital B&W photos eNo Digital Photography 13 November 9th 04 09:00 PM
Digital Photo Album (Tagging) A Bazin Digital Photography 3 October 29th 04 06:36 AM
Which is better? digital cameras or older crappy cameras thatuse film? Michael Weinstein, M.D. In The Darkroom 13 January 24th 04 09:51 PM
Which is better? digital cameras or older crappy cameras that use film? [email protected] Film & Labs 20 January 24th 04 09:51 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.