Sigma foveon very odd

In article ,
RichA wrote:

If the RGB additive process means better colour fidelity, why do people shot
with it look like they need liver transplants and why is the camera so
terribly noisy?


https://www.dpreview.com/articles/89...udio-test-scen
e#viewComments

why did you put sigma foveon in the subject then babble about something
else?

In article ,
RichA wrote:

If the RGB additive process means better colour fidelity, why do people
shot
with it look like they need liver transplants and why is the camera so
terribly noisy?



https://www.dpreview.com/articles/89...o-studio-test-
scen
e#viewComments
why did you put sigma foveon in the subject then babble about something
else?

I was talking about Foveon. What else are you referring to?

the link is about the sony a1.

In article ,
RichA wrote:

why did you put sigma foveon in the subject then babble about something
else?

I was talking about Foveon. What else are you referring to?
the link is about the sony a1.

The comparison I did on their site unfortunately can't be linked, you can
only link the cameras they've chosen to illustrate.
I was contrasting the foveon against the Sony, Nikon, etc.

foveon is unmitigated garbage, with a delusional cult following.

Interesting thing
about the Sony; not as clean as the newest
Canon so Canon has really improved the noise characteristics of their sensors lately.

everyone has, except foveon, which can't.