If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
10 fps versus 5 fps
Toby wrote:
"Alan Browne" schrieb im Newsbeitrag ... Stefan Patric wrote: If you're a good still photographer, 3 to 4 frames per second is all you really need to get great action sequences. However, if all you really want is "peak action," great photographers have been doing that for 60 years and without motor drives. The least useful specs that get people to fork over cash: * fps * start up time * high number of focus points That totally depends on what you shoot. If you are a sports shooter high burst rates are critical. You will not find a single pro at the Olympics shooting with a camera that does under 8 fps. And most photojournalists I know here in Asia shoot bracketed bursts of three shots for every frame. Getting one good shot pays for the body, and more. Of course if you don't do this kind of stuff you can live with a couple of fps and never miss it. And that's the point, isn't it? Most DSLR buyers are not sports shooters who "need" high fps. And its value to sports shooters is not as high as you may believe. But as a worm on the hook for Johnny-bucks-in-pants, fps followed by other marginal spec items gets the plastic out. And guess what? A lot of great sports photography was made before motor drives appeared... that took talent and specific knowledge of the sport. A "better" sports camera was the Canon 1n RS (pellicule mirror) as its shutter delay was on the order of 5ms ... 10x faster than D/SLR's at the mere cost of a stop of light in the VF and onto the film. I'm disappointed Canon have not rolled this out in a DSLR esp. as the clean higher ISO images overwhelm the stop of light loss. An article a few years ago about SI shooters at the super bowl producing 10's of thousands of photos that were considered crap by the photo editor belies the notion of high fps shooting being the way to shoot sports. Talent is better than high fps. -- -- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm -- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm -- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin -- e-meil: Remove FreeLunch. -- usenet posts from gmail.com and googlemail.com are filtered out. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
TV screens big versus Small LCD versus Plasma. | Little Green Eyed Dragon | Digital Photography | 0 | March 2nd 07 08:04 PM |
5D versus 20D | Rich | Digital SLR Cameras | 14 | October 29th 05 02:14 AM |
4:3 versus 3:2 | Rich | Digital SLR Cameras | 21 | October 28th 05 03:46 AM |
Expected versus Taken | [email protected] | Digital Photography | 30 | March 30th 05 01:09 PM |
17-40 L versus 17-85 EFS | Don | Digital Photography | 5 | January 6th 05 04:58 AM |