If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
The Most Mysterious Mansion in London is For Sale (some interesting photos) so not too OT
On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 08:54:54 -0700 (PDT), Whisky-dave
wrote: On Friday, 17 June 2016 10:18:33 UTC+1, Eric Stevens wrote: On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 17:08:08 -0700, Savageduck wrote: On 2016-06-16 23:27:38 +0000, Eric Stevens said: On 16 Jun 2016 18:28:14 GMT, Whiskers wrote: On 2016-06-16, RichA wrote: On Wednesday, 15 June 2016 07:50:03 UTC-4, Whiskers wrote: Batteries need charging, and if there was any old electric installation I'd hope that it had been replaced by modern stuff as one of the first things they did, if only so that they could use power tools for all the repairs and restoration. I think buildings of 'that age' would have had no electricity or gas when built. This one has (it says) been uninhabited for over a century so it's likely that no gas or electricity installation had been made at all. It does seem to have some indoor plumbing though. If the wiring in the walls was the old cloth-covered stuff, you could probably charge an iPad by induction... WWI wiring (ie what would be the latest likely installation if the place has been unoccupied for 100 years) might well be un-insulated 'knob and tube' intended for whatever DC voltage the local power station (Shoreditch?) could have got that far - likely less than 100 volts. (London's original power companies were very local, so DC was fine for them). I thought it was the other way around. Power supplies were DC and could only service local consumers. Tesla had yet to win his war with Edison. The Edison-Tesla war was a US Civil War and more legend than fact, I don't believe that true impact of that was felt until in the UK until it was decided. Umm: err ...? Also, Tesla was more of a catalyst in a war between Edison and Westinghouse. Tesla was the technical brain behind Westinghouse. Westinghouse was the financial muscle. That said a check of the timeline of the UK electricity supply has the following chronological events: 1882, the Electric Lighting Act 1882 allowed the setting up of supply systems by persons, companies or local authorities. 1888, amendment to the 1882 Act making the setting up of a supply company easier. 1891, London Electric Supply Corporation (LESCo) opened Deptford Power Station, UK's first AC power system. 1901, Newcastle-On-Tyne Electric Supply Company (NESCo) opened Neptune Bank Power Station, the first in the UK to supply three-phase electric power. I couldn't find any history of extensive UK domestic DC electric supply prior to that timeline, though I am sure there had to be some sort of impact of Faraday's work and the advent of the industrial revolution. It is worth noting that Tesla only started working for Edison in 1884 and quit in 1886. By 1888 Edison had lost the AC-DC power transmission war to Westinghouse, and the dirrection in Europe was toward AC generation/transmission. AC was the only way to go. The technical limitations of DC meant that it should have been a non-starter. -- Regards, Eric Stevens DC was better for small scale stuff and easir and cheaper. Just think how much a problem it'd be to use AC as power to your camera. Just think how difficult it would be to supply a steel mill power if you only had DC. Threre's some evidence that DC was used by the Egyptians if not earlier civerlisations had DC. -- Regards, Eric Stevens |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|