If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
EFKE film - suitable filters
Yes, these films, as I said, are only slightly less red-sensitive than
Plus-X or Tri-X. Peter Irwin wrote: seog wrote: wrote in message oups.com... I would appreciate advice on filters to use with this "ortho-panchromatic" film. "Orthopanchromatic" means "correct panchromatic" rather than a cross between orthochromatic and panchromatic. Many years ago there used to be many "hyper-panchromatic" films which were oversensitive to red. Kodak calls orthopanchromatic films "type B" and hyperpanchromatic films "type C." The Efke films are a bit less sensitive to red than most "type B" films. (Kodak's "type A" films were the old pre-1931 panchromatic films which were strongly oversensitive to blue.) If you want the ortho look try a blue filter with regular film. A blue filter (such as a #47) will give you a colour-blind look rather than an ortho look. Ortho films are quite sensitive to green and yellow so that grass comes out a reasonably light shade on ortho films instead of quite dark as it appears on colour-blind materials. A #44A minus-red filter would give you the ortho look, but it is a hard filter to find in anything other than a gel. Maco PO-100 is a good choice for a fine grained ortho film is you really want that look. I've used it and it is nice for what it is, but most of the time I'm not too keen on reds appearing really dark. The dark reds can sometimes give a nice effect on brick buildings. Old-fashioned means different things to different people. 1930s 35mm film was generally panchromatic, but rather grainy except for the really slow films. Most plates for large format were color-blind (blue sensitive only) though both ortho and panchromatic plates were reasonably common in the early twentieth century. The most common old rollfilms were orthochromatic, though the early Kodak NC films were only slightly sensitive to green. Panchromatic rollfilm was readily obtainable in the 1930s, but wasn't as popular as the highly orthochromatic films like Verichrome which had plenty of sensitivity to green, but none to red. I think it would help if the OP specified what kind of look he was going for, a reference to well known photographs or the work of a particular photographer might be helpful. Peter. -- |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
EFKE film - suitable filters
G- Blank wrote:
You need and old fashioned one. What exactly did "they suggest". OK, I'm no expert and have never used the stuff. I do however have a copy of 'The Dictionary of Photography', 17th edition, third impression 1952. The dust jacket proclaims it has been in print over 60 years. Orthochromatic film is covered under 'colour-sensative emulsions'. It discussed 'modern orthochromatic emulsions' so it might be the sort of reference book you need. If you are using Orthochromatic film of type 'B', which has a dip in sensativity at the blue/green part of its response it suggests a 'yellow filter of quite moderate depth'. Further, for type C orthochromatic film which does not have the dip in the blue green sensativity but has a reduced blue sensativity it suggests a 'still paler yellow filter'. Note that the aim with the above is to obtain a realistic representation. It also notes the lack of red sensativity. Pete -- http://www.petezilla.co.uk |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
EFKE film - suitable filters
These films are panchromatic, not orthochromatic.
Peter Chant wrote: G- Blank wrote: You need and old fashioned one. What exactly did "they suggest". OK, I'm no expert and have never used the stuff. I do however have a copy of 'The Dictionary of Photography', 17th edition, third impression 1952. The dust jacket proclaims it has been in print over 60 years. Orthochromatic film is covered under 'colour-sensative emulsions'. It discussed 'modern orthochromatic emulsions' so it might be the sort of reference book you need. If you are using Orthochromatic film of type 'B', which has a dip in sensativity at the blue/green part of its response it suggests a 'yellow filter of quite moderate depth'. Further, for type C orthochromatic film which does not have the dip in the blue green sensativity but has a reduced blue sensativity it suggests a 'still paler yellow filter'. Note that the aim with the above is to obtain a realistic representation. It also notes the lack of red sensativity. Pete -- http://www.petezilla.co.uk |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
EFKE film - suitable filters
UC wrote:
These films are panchromatic, not orthochromatic. OK, but is does not make much difference: It states that ortho-panchromatic film, also known as recte-panchromatic film is adjusted to give without a filter the closes possible approach to correct production of colours in monochrome. It then notes in most cases there is an excessive sensitivity to blue and therefore a yellow filter of moderate depth should be used. -- http://www.petezilla.co.uk |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
EFKE film - suitable filters
On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 14:50:37 GMT, "Nicholas
O. Lindan" wrote: .... the mood of the pictu Heavy, black, grainy for the Comecon look; Sparkling and sunny for Arts & Crafts; Smokey and wet for Viennese moderne; Black and wet for Weimar Berlin; Heavy, black and not so grainy for Bill Brandt's London. .... January 28, 2006, from Lloyd Erlick, Oh, thank you! --le (hey, what about Karsh's Ottawa??) but it won't turn Santa Cruz into the Balkans. You're on such a roll -- please continue with this one... regards, --le ________________________________ Lloyd Erlick Portraits, Toronto. voice: 416-686-0326 email: net: www.heylloyd.com ________________________________ -- |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
EFKE film - suitable filters
On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 14:50:37 GMT, "Nicholas O. Lindan"
wrote: Taking the picture on Croatian film may add to the mood of the photographer and make it easier to 'get in the groove' but it won't turn Santa Cruz into the Balkans. Yeah but one good rumble of mother Nature's belly and it might make the Balkans look like paradise. == John - Photographer & Webmaster www.puresilver.org - www.xs750.net |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
EFKE film - suitable filters
A #44A minus-red filter would
give you the ortho look, but it is a hard filter to find in anything other than a gel. Maco PO-100 is a good choice for a fine grained ortho film is you really want that look. I've used it and it is nice for what it is, but most of the time I'm not too keen on reds appearing really dark. The dark reds can sometimes give a nice effect on brick buildings. Old-fashioned means different things to different people. 1930s 35mm film was generally panchromatic, but rather grainy except for the really slow films. Most plates for large format were color-blind (blue sensitive only) though both ortho and panchromatic plates were reasonably common in the early twentieth century. The most common old rollfilms were orthochromatic, though the early Kodak NC films were only slightly sensitive to green. Panchromatic rollfilm was readily obtainable in the 1930s, but wasn't as popular as the highly orthochromatic films like Verichrome which had plenty of sensitivity to green, but none to red. I think it would help if the OP specified what kind of look he was going for, a reference to well known photographs or the work of a particular photographer might be helpful. Peter. -- Thanks for all the advice received. I'm not entirely certain about the exact type of image I'd like to end up with (this will be my first trip to Eastern Europe) but I'd like to take some pictures that look as if they might have been taken in the 1920/30s. I'd like to include some street scenes with people in the historic parts of Prague, Vienna and Budapest, (though I suspect it will be difficult to come across anybody who isn't dressed like a typical Westerner, these days). I think Viennese Moderne sounds closer to what I'd like to achieve; I'm not keen to take depressing pictures which are reminiscent of the Communist era). I can't think of a particular photographer that I'd like to emulate but perhaps Andre Kertesz comes closest and I'd like to achieve the tonality of Frantisek Drtikol and Anton Josef Trcka's photos but I don't know whether it has anything to do with the type of film they were shooting. By the way, I haven't been able to find what the filter factor would be for a cyan 44a. Thanks again - Phil Lamerton |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
EFKE film - suitable filters
wrote: -- Thanks for all the advice received. I'm not entirely certain about the exact type of image I'd like to end up with (this will be my first trip to Eastern Europe) but I'd like to take some pictures that look as if they might have been taken in the 1920/30s. I'd like to include some street scenes with people in the historic parts of Prague, Vienna and Budapest, (though I suspect it will be difficult to come across anybody who isn't dressed like a typical Westerner, these days). I think Viennese Moderne sounds closer to what I'd like to achieve; I'm not keen to take depressing pictures which are reminiscent of the Communist era). I can't think of a particular photographer that I'd like to emulate but perhaps Andre Kertesz comes closest and I'd like to achieve the tonality of Frantisek Drtikol and Anton Josef Trcka's photos but I don't know whether it has anything to do with the type of film they were shooting. Not really. Just use good film and strive to get the best results you can. By the way, I haven't been able to find what the filter factor would be for a cyan 44a. Thanks again - Phil Lamerton |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
EFKE film - suitable filters
wrote:
I'm not entirely certain about the exact type of image I'd like to end up with (this will be my first trip to Eastern Europe) but I'd like to take some pictures that look as if they might have been taken in the 1920/30s. I'd like to include some street scenes with people in the historic parts of Prague, Vienna and Budapest, (though I suspect it will be difficult to come across anybody who isn't dressed like a typical Westerner, these days). Panchromatic film will be correct for the 1930s stuff. Some of Andre Kertesz's earliest works looks like it was taken on plates which were mostly sensitive to blue, but the ones from the 1930s look panchromatic to me. For many people the most familiar images of the 1930s are from old B&W movies, and it is interesting to note that 1930s B&W movies were all on panchro film. The transition to sound films in the late 1920s required hissy Klieg lights to be replaced by tungsten lights which were rich in red and required panchromatic film to make efficient use of the light. I'm pretty certain that the rapid rise in popularity of panchromatic film for still cameras had a lot to do with people seeing improved colour rendering in the cinema. By the way, I haven't been able to find what the filter factor would be for a cyan 44a. Filter factor for the #44A minus-red should be 3 for daylight and 5 for tungsten for most panchromatic films. A minus-red filter or ortho film has the somewhat counter-intuitive effect of drawing attention to red. Faces will often look rougher, which is sometimes desired in male portraiture. Red bricks will come out darker than one might expect and this may show patterns in brickwork more clearly than colour film would. Red in flags, uniforms and other clothing may be reproduced as almost black and show up rather better than if red were reproduced as a light shade of gray. But, unless you know that you want a contrast filter to show reds as dark, you are best off using panchromatic film with either no filter, a yellow #8(K2) or a panchromatic green #11 (X1) correction filter. Strong contrast filters can sometimes have a different effect than the one you were planning on. If you are on vacation, you won't be able to easily retake the picture, so if you do use a filter, take another picture without the filter at the same time. Peter. -- |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Efke vs. TP film | [email protected] | In The Darkroom | 9 | January 22nd 06 10:21 PM |
Efke 50 film and PMK developing times | Steve | In The Darkroom | 0 | July 19th 05 10:06 PM |
is it a forgone conclusion... | Robert S. Dean | In The Darkroom | 123 | March 18th 05 04:15 AM |
8Mp Digital The Theoretical 35mm Quality Equivelant | Matt | Digital Photography | 1144 | December 17th 04 09:48 PM |
Focal plane vs. leaf shutters in MF SLRs | KM | Medium Format Photography Equipment | 724 | December 7th 04 09:58 AM |