If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
"Mojtaba" wrote in message ... I neither red nor participate Mojtaba nor spell correctly. Do you own a Nikon? |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
"Brian Baird" wrote in message .. . In article , says... Smarterstats shows me that a total of 283 visitors looked at the page I put up showing the photo of the plane crash on the 23rd. Interesting... I wonder how many people read these groups but don't participate. Any photos of mine that get posted here regularly get 300+ hits. I think there are a lot of bots scanning the newsgroups, although I'm sure some actual lurkers may look at things. I'm always looking for pictures of naked ladies, myself...... |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Rox-off wrote:
Smarterstats shows me that a total of 283 visitors looked at the page I put up showing the photo of the plane crash on the 23rd. Interesting... I wonder how many people read these groups but don't participate. Does it show how many repeat visits? I ended up going back to it several times between other sites while looking up stuff that caught my interest while reading the group. Say 10 hits with the back button. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
"no one" wrote in message ... Rox-off wrote: Smarterstats shows me that a total of 283 visitors looked at the page I put up showing the photo of the plane crash on the 23rd. Interesting... I wonder how many people read these groups but don't participate. Does it show how many repeat visits? I ended up going back to it several times between other sites while looking up stuff that caught my interest while reading the group. Say 10 hits with the back button. Hitting a "back" button doesn't register as a hit, because it doesn't require accessing the server. Most often, that page is in your computer's memory, unless you have actively disabled this. Many services are smart enough to identify your IP, and won't keep counting you (like when you participate in an on-line poll or vote, for example...they know you'vebeen there). I'm sure hitting the back button won't keep registering, but it's quite possible (likely) that return visits (other than the back button) count. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
says...
In article , says... Smarterstats shows me that a total of 283 visitors looked at the page I put up showing the photo of the plane crash on the 23rd. Interesting... I wonder how many people read these groups but don't participate. Any photos of mine that get posted here regularly get 300+ hits. I think there are a lot of bots scanning the newsgroups, although I'm sure some actual lurkers may look at things. Per day? -- Save Photography | Shoot some film today! Email: drop rods and insert surfaces |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
says...
In article , says... Of course the ******s reserve this treatment for anyone not claiming to be a deciple to the God of EOS. If that stopped, all the wise people of the world who avoid Canon like the plague, might discover Usenet all over again. Huh! hell will freeze over first. While the relentless, unthinking Canon-worship bothers me as much as anyone, if you really think that's why people get on your case... it's not. You'd get the same thing if you were a Canon loyalist. Actually, he got most of the trouble while he was using Canon gear. He's just off his rocker. I hope you're not referring to me. FWIW, during the three years I shot with Canon equipment I did notice that I had less hassle on here than previously (except for the Polson-Dallas wars, which I now regret having subjected the group to). As soon as I went back to using Nikon things definitely heated up again! -- Save Photography | Shoot some film today! Email: drop rods and insert surfaces |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
says... "Brian Baird" wrote in message .. . In article , says... Smarterstats shows me that a total of 283 visitors looked at the page I put up showing the photo of the plane crash on the 23rd. Interesting... I wonder how many people read these groups but don't participate. Any photos of mine that get posted here regularly get 300+ hits. I think there are a lot of bots scanning the newsgroups, although I'm sure some actual lurkers may look at things. I'm always looking for pictures of naked ladies, myself...... Look to your hearts content: www.ethoseros.com -- Save Photography | Shoot some film today! Email: drop rods and insert surfaces |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
"Rox-off" wrote in message ... In article , says... In article , says... Of course the ******s reserve this treatment for anyone not claiming to be a deciple to the God of EOS. If that stopped, all the wise people of the world who avoid Canon like the plague, might discover Usenet all over again. Huh! hell will freeze over first. While the relentless, unthinking Canon-worship bothers me as much as anyone, if you really think that's why people get on your case... it's not. You'd get the same thing if you were a Canon loyalist. Actually, he got most of the trouble while he was using Canon gear. He's just off his rocker. I hope you're not referring to me. FWIW, during the three years I shot with Canon equipment I did notice that I had less hassle on here than previously (except for the Polson-Dallas wars, which I now regret having subjected the group to). It wasn't *what* you shot that got hassled...it was your methods of carrying on about how crappy Canon was ad nauseum... But you and I agreed to stay clear of that (and we're both happier for it!), so I shall now shutteth my moutheth. Thounth like I'm lithping, doethn't it? As soon as I went back to using Nikon things definitely heated up again! Nah... Canon criticism is fine and good when it is somewhat deserved...and they have often deserved it. You received terrible customer service from them for some reason, and you deserved to be very very irritated. I've hurled many a frustration at Canon myself over the years on this forum... -No spot meter...CRAPPY raw software for years (though I just noticed it has finally improved), and etc. Part of what is happening here is that Canon became the market leader over Nikon somewhere in there. Canon also has raging success in the point-and-shoot market, especially compared with Nikon. That doesn't mean they are better, but it means that there are far more Canon users here than Nikon. Here's one indication: I tend to notice the part of dpreview's page that ranks the percentage of "clicks" different cameras get on their site, and they are ranked 1-10 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
very interesting...DONT PASS THIS UP! | shane | Digital Photography | 6 | January 13th 05 09:45 PM |
Now this is interesting... | Lisa Horton | Digital Photography | 1 | October 31st 04 07:06 AM |
Interesting fact LCD panels... | Mark M | Digital Photography | 18 | August 28th 04 02:48 AM |
Interesting | Awushi Stolton | 35mm Photo Equipment | 0 | August 21st 04 02:48 PM |
interesting technique | Rusty Wright | Photographing People | 5 | November 24th 03 12:28 AM |