I made lemonade this morning.

On 9/8/2014 5:46 PM, John McWilliams wrote:
On 9/8/14 PDT, 2:27 PM, PeterN wrote:
On 9/7/2014 3:48 AM, Sandman wrote:
In article , PeterN wrote:

I wanted to catch the sunrise this morning. A moderate fog came in,
so I took fog images. As usual all constructive comments are welcome

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/97242118/dumbo%20at%20dawn_6447.jpg



For the pixel peepers, The image ws not sharpened and all
adjustments were made in ACR & PS.

Why such low res? I'd much prefer to see the full res image. It looks
to be
quite a good image.


Sorry. Any image I may have furthr use for will be shown only in low
res, for obvious reasons.

Lo rez, fine, but at least make it fill a browser page. Or put a
watermark on it. Are your images that sought after??


I've heard complaints here about watermarks.
There was a recent occurance, and I made a decision to use low res. You
are right I could increase the pixel count in low res. but, in some
competitions thre is a limit of 750 pixels on the longest side. So also
call it habit.


--
PeterN

On 2014-09-08 21:46:48 +0000, John McWilliams said:

On 9/8/14 PDT, 2:27 PM, PeterN wrote:
On 9/7/2014 3:48 AM, Sandman wrote:
In article , PeterN wrote:

I wanted to catch the sunrise this morning. A moderate fog came in,
so I took fog images. As usual all constructive comments are welcome

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/97242118/dumbo%20at%20dawn_6447.jpg


For the pixel peepers, The image ws not sharpened and all
adjustments were made in ACR & PS.

Why such low res? I'd much prefer to see the full res image. It looks
to be
quite a good image.


Sorry. Any image I may have furthr use for will be shown only in low
res, for obvious reasons.

Lo rez, fine, but at least make it fill a browser page. Or put a
watermark on it.

Yup! I find using a height dimension of 860–960p and a width of
1100–1800p works quite well and should fit most browsers.

This one is 1296 x 940:
https://db.tt/9wSZENOY

Are your images that sought after??

;-)

--
Regards,

Savageduck

On 2014-09-08 22:07:50 +0000, PeterN said:

On 9/8/2014 5:46 PM, John McWilliams wrote:
On 9/8/14 PDT, 2:27 PM, PeterN wrote:
On 9/7/2014 3:48 AM, Sandman wrote:
In article , PeterN wrote:

I wanted to catch the sunrise this morning. A moderate fog came in,
so I took fog images. As usual all constructive comments are welcome

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/97242118/dumbo%20at%20dawn_6447.jpg



For the pixel peepers, The image ws not sharpened and all
adjustments were made in ACR & PS.

Why such low res? I'd much prefer to see the full res image. It looks
to be
quite a good image.


Sorry. Any image I may have furthr use for will be shown only in low
res, for obvious reasons.

Lo rez, fine, but at least make it fill a browser page. Or put a
watermark on it. Are your images that sought after??


I've heard complaints here about watermarks.

I don't use watermarks, and I am not particularly paranoid about
sharing my images.
Maybe I should start watermarking. ;-)
https://db.tt/1hNERVG2


There was a recent occurance, and I made a decision to use low res. You
are right I could increase the pixel count in low res. but, in some
competitions thre is a limit of 750 pixels on the longest side. So also
call it habit.

750p!!! ...and you are shooting with a D800. What sort of competitions
are you entering that all they want are not much better than postage
stamps?

BTW: What "recent occurrence"?

There was a time when size limits really mattered with online sharing &
monitor display, when there were bandwidth concerns, and some
limitations on monitors of the day. Those days are past when 750p on
the longest edge is silly given the current display sizes and
resolutions. In the past that 750p might fill a dispaly, today not so
much.

--
Regards,

Savageduck

In article 2014090817052143404-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom,
Savageduck wrote:

In the past that 750p might fill a dispaly, today not so
much.

icons are bigger than that now.

On 2014-09-09 00:06:26 +0000, nospam said:

In article 2014090817052143404-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom,
Savageduck wrote:

In the past that 750p might fill a dispaly, today not so
much.

icons are bigger than that now.

Strange, I was thinking along the same lines.

--
Regards,

Savageduck

In article , PeterN wrote:

PeterN:
I wanted to catch the sunrise this morning. A moderate fog came
in, so I took fog images. As usual all constructive comments are
welcome

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/97242118/dumbo%20at%20dawn_6447.jpg

For the pixel peepers, The image ws not sharpened and all
adjustments were made in ACR & PS.

Sandman:
Why such low res? I'd much prefer to see the full res image. It
looks to be quite a good image.

Sorry. Any image I may have furthr use for will be shown only in low
res, for obvious reasons.

No reasons that are obvious to me, no.

--
Sandman[.net]

In article , Sandman
wrote:

I wanted to catch the sunrise this morning. A moderate fog came
in, so I took fog images. As usual all constructive comments are
welcome

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/97242118/dumbo%20at%20dawn_6447.jpg

For the pixel peepers, The image ws not sharpened and all
adjustments were made in ACR & PS.

Sandman:
Why such low res? I'd much prefer to see the full res image. It
looks to be quite a good image.

Sorry. Any image I may have furthr use for will be shown only in low
res, for obvious reasons.

No reasons that are obvious to me, no.

he thinks people are going to steal his photos.

On 9/9/2014 11:08 AM, nospam wrote:
In article , Sandman
wrote:

I wanted to catch the sunrise this morning. A moderate fog came
in, so I took fog images. As usual all constructive comments are
welcome

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/97242118/dumbo%20at%20dawn_6447.jpg

For the pixel peepers, The image ws not sharpened and all
adjustments were made in ACR & PS.

Sandman:
Why such low res? I'd much prefer to see the full res image. It
looks to be quite a good image.

Sorry. Any image I may have furthr use for will be shown only in low
res, for obvious reasons.

No reasons that are obvious to me, no.

he thinks people are going to steal his photos.


You always know what someone else is thinking.
I have posted play photos, and you don't even have the guts to play. You
have never posted anything.


--
PeterN

Is it me or was there suddenly a big drop in the number of posts to this
group each day?

On 2014-09-10 18:18:42 +0000, "PAS" said:

Is it me or was there suddenly a big drop in the number of posts to
this group each day?


Yup!

--
Regards,

Savageduck