If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
"Capt Donkey Smile" wrote in message oups.com... Hello, Please correct me where I am wrong. I understand that the focal length of the lens can be varied and in doing so you change the "zoom" of the lens. Well, with a zoom lens you can change the focal length, yes. That's what zoom lens means. Changing the focal length changes the image size in direction proportion, e.g. 2x the focal length = 2x the image size. I understand that 50mm sees things pretty much as I see it. Actually, NO camera lens really "sees thing pretty much as [you] see it," for a lot of reasons. Your visual angle of view (assuming normal eyesight) is much wider than the field of view of a 50mm lens, as you can easily see for yourself. On the other hand, most of what you can see over that wide field of view (typically about 180 degrees horizontally) you cannot see very sharply, while the 50mm lens covers everything sharply. Also, your eye's "film," the retina, is essentially the inside of a hemisphere whereas in a film or digital camera the corresponding sensor is flat. So there is just no way any conventional camera can really see as your eye sees. The 50mm lens (on a 35mm camera) has been regarded as "normal" for decades. That doesn't mean the camera with such a lens sees as your eye sees, only that it produces an image that "looks about right," neither too wide nor too narrow in angle of view. Actually the 50mm lens is a little long for "normal" on a 35, since traditionally "normal" has meant equivalent to the diagonal of the negative--which would be about 43mm on a 35. "Normal" lenses for 35s have been made with all sorts of focal lengths, from 40 to 58mm at least. There is nothing sacred or cosmically significant about 50mm. I have a 1.6x crop so to see things through the camera as I see it, I 'd shoot at 50/1.6= ~30mm. Right, a 30mm lens on such a camera would give you the equivalent of 50mm on a 35. Just don't take that focal length as being too important, as it is not. If I wanted 10x zoom, would I be looking for an effective focal length of 500mm? Depends. Most zoom lenses are somewhat wide angle at the short end, not "normal." If you assume that you want a zoom that STARTS at around "normal" then yes, something equivalent to 50-500mm would be the 10x zoom you'd look for. But much more usual is a 10x zoom somewhat wider at the short end, like 38-380mm. Thanks N. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
"Charles Schuler" wrote in message ... I understand that the focal length of the lens can be varied and in doing so you change the "zoom" of the lens. Prime lenses are fixed in FL and zoom lenses allow a range of FLs. No offense, but there are already so many well-meaning people ignorantly misusing "prime lens" in this way, it sure would be nice if we could stop encouraging innocent newbies to parrot the same mistake. A prime lens is THE CAMERA LENS, as opposed to some other optical device used with it. A zoom lens is a prime lens just as much as a fixed focal length (FFL) lens is. "Prime" is correctly used here in the sense of primary, chief or original. There is NO definition for "prime" that means fixed focal length or fixed anything else. N. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
"Charles Schuler" wrote in message ... I understand that the focal length of the lens can be varied and in doing so you change the "zoom" of the lens. Prime lenses are fixed in FL and zoom lenses allow a range of FLs. No offense, but there are already so many well-meaning people ignorantly misusing "prime lens" in this way, it sure would be nice if we could stop encouraging innocent newbies to parrot the same mistake. A prime lens is THE CAMERA LENS, as opposed to some other optical device used with it. A zoom lens is a prime lens just as much as a fixed focal length (FFL) lens is. "Prime" is correctly used here in the sense of primary, chief or original. There is NO definition for "prime" that means fixed focal length or fixed anything else. N. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
"Nostrobino" wrote in message m... "Charles Schuler" wrote in message ... I understand that the focal length of the lens can be varied and in doing so you change the "zoom" of the lens. Prime lenses are fixed in FL and zoom lenses allow a range of FLs. No offense, but there are already so many well-meaning people ignorantly misusing "prime lens" in this way, it sure would be nice if we could stop encouraging innocent newbies to parrot the same mistake. Prime lens. A lens with a fixed focal length - its field of view cannot be changed. At least, not without the addition of supplemental lenses or teleconverters. Generally, prime lenses are lighter, sharper, cheaper and of higher optical quality than zoom lenses, since it's easier to build a prime lens than a zoom. By tradition, common prime lenses used by 35mm cameras are lenses with 28, 50, 85, 100 and 135mm focal lengths. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Nostrobino wrote:
No offense, but there are already so many well-meaning people ignorantly misusing "prime lens" in this way, it sure would be nice if we could stop encouraging innocent newbies to parrot the same mistake. No offence, but if you could start spelling "offence" properly -- as it was originally spelled in English -- and not encouraging linguistic neophytes from propagating the same mistake, maybe your argument would have slightly more than the zero force it presently has? A prime lens is THE CAMERA LENS, as opposed to some other optical device used with it. A zoom lens is a prime lens just as much as a fixed focal length (FFL) lens is. "Prime" is correctly used here in the sense of primary, chief or original. There is NO definition for "prime" that means fixed focal length or fixed anything else. Tilt on, man! Tilt on! |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
No offense, but there are already so many well-meaning people ignorantly misusing "prime lens" in this way, it sure would be nice if we could stop encouraging innocent newbies to parrot the same mistake. No offense taken, but you have stated one point of view. From the dictionary at PhotoNotes.Org: "Prime lens. A lens with a fixed focal length - its field of view cannot be changed. At least, not without the addition of supplemental lenses or teleconverters. Generally, prime lenses are lighter, sharper, cheaper and of higher optical quality than zoom lenses, since it's easier to build a prime lens than a zoom. By tradition, common prime lenses used by 35mm cameras are lenses with 28, 50, 85, 100 and 135mm focal lengths." Check other sources ... the definition of a prime lens, as presented, is widely used. Cheers |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
No offense, but there are already so many well-meaning people ignorantly misusing "prime lens" in this way, it sure would be nice if we could stop encouraging innocent newbies to parrot the same mistake. No offense taken, but you have stated one point of view. From the dictionary at PhotoNotes.Org: "Prime lens. A lens with a fixed focal length - its field of view cannot be changed. At least, not without the addition of supplemental lenses or teleconverters. Generally, prime lenses are lighter, sharper, cheaper and of higher optical quality than zoom lenses, since it's easier to build a prime lens than a zoom. By tradition, common prime lenses used by 35mm cameras are lenses with 28, 50, 85, 100 and 135mm focal lengths." Check other sources ... the definition of a prime lens, as presented, is widely used. Cheers |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
"Capt Donkey Smile" wrote in
oups.com: Hello, Please correct me where I am wrong. I understand that the focal length of the lens can be varied and in doing so you change the "zoom" of the lens. I understand that 50mm sees things pretty much as I see it. I have a 1.6x crop so to see things through the camera as I see it, I 'd shoot at 50/1.6= ~30mm. no. "sees things as i see it" depends more than on just the focal length. also, using digital instead of film doesn't change focal lengths. nor would it adjust the scale of things as you view them through the viewfinder. -- http://www.neopets.com/refer.phtml?username=moosespet |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
"Randy L." wrote in
: Capt, My understanding is that the 50mm = 1x rule is correct for 35mm film cameras, but that for digital SLR's it more like a focal length of 35mm = 1x due to the smaller size of the CCD. That's not correct. the size of your capture area doesn't change how much magnification is produced by your lense, nor does it change what you see through the viewfinder. If you had a ccd that was the identical size of a 35mm negative, and then replaced it with one that was only 1/4 the size, you wouldn't then need a different lense to get the same image proportions. -- http://www.neopets.com/refer.phtml?username=moosespet |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
wrote in message oups.com... Nostrobino wrote: No offense, but there are already so many well-meaning people ignorantly misusing "prime lens" in this way, it sure would be nice if we could stop encouraging innocent newbies to parrot the same mistake. No offence, but if you could start spelling "offence" properly -- as it was originally spelled in English -- Many words are spelled differently in American English than in British English, and this is one of them. Many are pronounced differently too; for example we say and write "aluminum" where they use "aluminium." We also say "fenders" where the Brits say "wings," they call "petrol" what we call "gasoline," and so on. It is not the SPELLING of "prime" I'm objecting to, but its misusage. Spell it "pryme" if you like. Just don't use it for "fixed focal length," please. N. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Newbie question - Correct exposure for Velvia | Dmitry | 35mm Photo Equipment | 34 | September 13th 04 01:35 PM |
Newbie question (need advice!) | GameFan72 | Digital Photography | 18 | September 11th 04 01:03 AM |
One more Newbie Question | MATT WILLIAMS | Large Format Photography Equipment | 6 | July 15th 04 04:12 AM |
Newbie question: metering the GG | MikeWhy | Large Format Photography Equipment | 4 | February 2nd 04 03:55 AM |
Newbie question: lenses | MikeWhy | Large Format Photography Equipment | 13 | February 1st 04 08:24 PM |