If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Eclipse of the Moon
Dear Readers:
Any thoughts regarding photographing the eclipse of the moon tonight? An article in Sky & Telescope advised against using exposures longer than a few seconds with a stationarily mounted 500 mm telephoto lens; who has any thoughts on this? The same article gave a tremendous range of possible exposure times depending on the depth of the shadow, so the only thing to do it seems is massive bracketing. Since my telephoto lens is limited to f/8, I'm going to try to push Fujicolor 1600 one stop to EI 3200; is this a bad idea? Cheers, --travis |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"Travis Porco" wrote in message ... Dear Readers: Any thoughts regarding photographing the eclipse of the moon tonight? An article in Sky & Telescope advised against using exposures longer than a few seconds with a stationarily mounted 500 mm telephoto lens; who has any thoughts on this? Anything longer than 1 second (with a 500-mm lens) will show some trailing as the moon moves across the sky. It probably won't be objectionable unless you go beyond about 3 seconds. The same article gave a tremendous range of possible exposure times depending on the depth of the shadow, so the only thing to do it seems is massive bracketing. Right. You may be able to classify it as a light or dark eclipse after totality begins. Exposure calculator at www.covingtoninnovations.com/astromenu.html. Since my telephoto lens is limited to f/8, I'm going to try to push Fujicolor 1600 one stop to EI 3200; is this a bad idea? Haven't tried that film. Of course, a grainy picture is better than no picture at all! -- Clear skies, Michael A. Covington Author, Astrophotography for the Amateur www.covingtoninnovations.com/astromenu.html |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Travis Porco wrote:
Dear Readers: Any thoughts regarding photographing the eclipse of the moon tonight? An article in Sky & Telescope advised against using exposures longer than a few seconds with a stationarily mounted 500 mm telephoto lens; who has any thoughts on this? The same article gave a tremendous range of possible exposure times depending on the depth of the shadow, so the only thing to do it seems is massive bracketing. Since my telephoto lens is limited to f/8, I'm going to try to push Fujicolor 1600 one stop to EI 3200; is this a bad idea? Cheers, --travis It is probably too late, but: 1.) The moon occupies about 1/2 degree in the sky. 2.)The moon (and almost everything else) moves 15 degrees an hour. So you can figure an exposure of 1/30 hour will make a thing twice as long as it is wide (assuming a square moon). So two minutes exposure is surely too long. 3.) The moon reflects about 250 cd/ft^2, so your exposure might as well be 1/250 second using an aperture equal to the square root of your film speed, or equivalent. Say your film speed is ASA64. Square root of that is 8, so an exposure of 1/250 at f/8 would work. You need not stop down anymore because how much depth of field could you need with something a quarter million miles away? And opening it up should not be necessary because you should not need more shutter speed. -- .~. Jean-David Beyer Registered Linux User 85642. /V\ Registered Machine 241939. /( )\ Shrewsbury, New Jersey http://counter.li.org ^^-^^ 21:55:00 up 4 days, 23:47, 3 users, load average: 2.16, 2.24, 2.12 |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"Jean-David Beyer" wrote in message ... 3.) The moon reflects about 250 cd/ft^2, so your exposure might as well be 1/250 second using an aperture equal to the square root of your film speed, or equivalent. Say your film speed is ASA64. Square root of that is 8, so an exposure of 1/250 at f/8 would work. You need not stop down anymore because how much depth of field could you need with something a quarter million miles away? And opening it up should not be necessary because you should not need more shutter speed. Impressively accurate! But those calculations, alas, are for the uneclipsed moon... With a digital camera set to ISO 200, my exposures at f/10 were about 1/125 during penumbral phases, up to 2 seconds during the outer part of totality. I'm not trying to photograph deep totality. See: www.covingtoninnovations.com/michael/blog (October 27 entry). I'm doing very similar film photos, but of course they aren't developed yet A digital camera makes an excellent exposure meter for difficult subjects. Clear skies, Michael |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Travis Porco wrote:
Dear Readers: Any thoughts regarding photographing the eclipse of the moon tonight? An article in Sky & Telescope advised against using exposures longer than a few seconds with a stationarily mounted 500 mm telephoto lens; who has any thoughts on this? The same article gave a tremendous range of possible exposure times depending on the depth of the shadow, so the only thing to do it seems is massive bracketing. Since my telephoto lens is limited to f/8, I'm going to try to push Fujicolor 1600 one stop to EI 3200; is this a bad idea? S & T is a group of astronomers, not astro-photographers...... One thing to remember, the moon is a fairly light coloured object, lit directly by the sun, so often the best exposures are the same as for any other sun-lit object. It's not uncommon to, with 200ASA film, to use a shutter speed of 1/250th @ f/16 and get a pretty good shot. With the eclipse, your looking at an object in shadow, it should be darker then the same object when fully lit, so maybe add 1 or 2 stops, be careful though, it's easy to way over-expose it. With a lunar eclipse, the last thing you want to do is severally overexpose it, or you will simply wash it out and lose the effect of the eclipse, you want it darker then normal, but not so dark that you lose the detail. If you take (took)a whole roll, warn your lab, they will go nuts trying to compensate for printing, and often you get a washed out moon on a medium gray background...... W |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
"The Wogster" wrote in message ... One thing to remember, the moon is a fairly light coloured object, lit directly by the sun, so often the best exposures are the same as for any other sun-lit object. It's not uncommon to, with 200ASA film, to use a shutter speed of 1/250th @ f/16 and get a pretty good shot. With the eclipse, your looking at an object in shadow, it should be darker then the same object when fully lit, so maybe add 1 or 2 stops, be careful though, it's easy to way over-expose it. With a lunar eclipse, the last thing you want to do is severally overexpose it, or you will simply wash it out and lose the effect of the eclipse, you want it darker then normal, but not so dark that you lose the detail. But remember the penumbra! No part of the partially eclipsed moon is as bright as the normal full moon. If you take (took)a whole roll, warn your lab, they will go nuts trying to compensate for printing, and often you get a washed out moon on a medium gray background...... Yes, they need to know that the background is black. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Well, now that it's past, I hope you got some decent shots. I tried it
with my Hasselblad using provia 100f and a 150mm f4 lens. Last time I took pictures was with a Rolleiflex 2.8F (80mm) using the same film and exposures of about 10-15 seconds. The results were great. Not perfect as some celestial movement did occur during the exposure. What really made them neat was the path of the airplanes flying though the frame so I have a few slides of the eclipse, as well as the red and white lights from the planes. Oh, and the stars too.. One thing to remember when shooting the moon is what it's reflecting.. The sun. The eclipse, of course, is the earth blocking the light path from the sun to the moon. If it's something you'd want to play with more, there are all kinds of tracking devices that can be built to follow the paths of your subjects.. 8) Jeff (Travis Porco) wrote in message ... Dear Readers: Any thoughts regarding photographing the eclipse of the moon tonight? An article in Sky & Telescope advised against using exposures longer than a few seconds with a stationarily mounted 500 mm telephoto lens; who has any thoughts on this? The same article gave a tremendous range of possible exposure times depending on the depth of the shadow, so the only thing to do it seems is massive bracketing. Since my telephoto lens is limited to f/8, I'm going to try to push Fujicolor 1600 one stop to EI 3200; is this a bad idea? Cheers, --travis |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
"Jean-David Beyer" wrote in message
3.) The moon reflects about 250 cd/ft^2, so your exposure might as well be 1/250 second using an aperture equal to the square root of your film speed, or equivalent. Does this 1/(cd/sqft)seconds @ f-sqrt(ASA) produce an 18% grey? It does produce a 'sunny 16' exposure for the moon. -- Nicholas O. Lindan, Cleveland, Ohio Consulting Engineer: Electronics; Informatics; Photonics. Remove spaces etc. to reply: n o lindan at net com dot com |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
Michael A. Covington wrote: "Travis Porco" wrote in message ... Dear Readers: Any thoughts regarding photographing the eclipse of the moon tonight? An article in Sky & Telescope advised against using exposures longer than a few seconds with a stationarily mounted 500 mm telephoto lens; who has any thoughts on this? Anything longer than 1 second (with a 500-mm lens) will show some trailing as the moon moves across the sky. It probably won't be objectionable unless you go beyond about 3 seconds. The same article gave a tremendous range of possible exposure times depending on the depth of the shadow, so the only thing to do it seems is massive bracketing. Right. You may be able to classify it as a light or dark eclipse after totality begins. Exposure calculator at www.covingtoninnovations.com/astromenu.html. Since my telephoto lens is limited to f/8, I'm going to try to push Fujicolor 1600 one stop to EI 3200; is this a bad idea? Haven't tried that film. Of course, a grainy picture is better than no picture at all! Thanks for your thoughts and to everyone else who responded. cheers, --travis |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Eclipse of moon on Oct. 27 | Jerry Gunnett | Digital Photography | 132 | October 23rd 04 05:40 AM |
Eclipse of moon on Oct. 27 | b4 | 35mm Photo Equipment | 143 | October 23rd 04 05:40 AM |
Eclipse of moon on Oct. 27 | b4 | Digital Photography | 0 | October 16th 04 08:37 AM |
Eclipse of moon on Oct. 27 | Jerry Gunnett | 35mm Photo Equipment | 0 | October 16th 04 06:15 AM |