A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Photo Equipment » Large Format Photography Equipment
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Buildings are not always level



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 18th 04, 04:59 PM
jjs
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Buildings are not always level


While I think of it - for new viewcamera people - So you leveled your
camera, made perfect rise, triple checked all levels and the building is
still not level in the frame? Newsflash. Many old buildings are not
level! You might level the roof and find some doors, walls or windows
canted, or visa-versa. Funny how we don't always notice that in the frame,
but at the leisure of the lighttable, *argh*.

So, is it better to just show the building As Is or go to the fantastic
trouble of making it "look right"? Your decision.


  #2  
Old September 18th 04, 06:43 PM
Jean-David Beyer
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

jjs wrote:
While I think of it - for new viewcamera people - So you leveled your
camera, made perfect rise, triple checked all levels and the building is
still not level in the frame? Newsflash. Many old buildings are not
level! You might level the roof and find some doors, walls or windows
canted, or visa-versa. Funny how we don't always notice that in the frame,
but at the leisure of the lighttable, *argh*.

So, is it better to just show the building As Is or go to the fantastic
trouble of making it "look right"? Your decision.


Hey! By adjusting the camera properly, you can make the leaning tower of
Pisa stand up straight. ;-)

Actually, you could not because it started to lean as they were building
it and they tried to compensate. But if you could correct it, you would
remove all interest from the image.

--
.~. Jean-David Beyer Registered Linux User 85642.
/V\ Registered Machine 241939.
/( )\ Shrewsbury, New Jersey http://counter.li.org
^^-^^ 13:40:00 up 10 days, 23 min, 3 users, load average: 4.38, 4.18, 4.11

  #3  
Old September 18th 04, 06:43 PM
Jean-David Beyer
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

jjs wrote:
While I think of it - for new viewcamera people - So you leveled your
camera, made perfect rise, triple checked all levels and the building is
still not level in the frame? Newsflash. Many old buildings are not
level! You might level the roof and find some doors, walls or windows
canted, or visa-versa. Funny how we don't always notice that in the frame,
but at the leisure of the lighttable, *argh*.

So, is it better to just show the building As Is or go to the fantastic
trouble of making it "look right"? Your decision.


Hey! By adjusting the camera properly, you can make the leaning tower of
Pisa stand up straight. ;-)

Actually, you could not because it started to lean as they were building
it and they tried to compensate. But if you could correct it, you would
remove all interest from the image.

--
.~. Jean-David Beyer Registered Linux User 85642.
/V\ Registered Machine 241939.
/( )\ Shrewsbury, New Jersey http://counter.li.org
^^-^^ 13:40:00 up 10 days, 23 min, 3 users, load average: 4.38, 4.18, 4.11

  #4  
Old September 18th 04, 06:43 PM
Jean-David Beyer
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

jjs wrote:
While I think of it - for new viewcamera people - So you leveled your
camera, made perfect rise, triple checked all levels and the building is
still not level in the frame? Newsflash. Many old buildings are not
level! You might level the roof and find some doors, walls or windows
canted, or visa-versa. Funny how we don't always notice that in the frame,
but at the leisure of the lighttable, *argh*.

So, is it better to just show the building As Is or go to the fantastic
trouble of making it "look right"? Your decision.


Hey! By adjusting the camera properly, you can make the leaning tower of
Pisa stand up straight. ;-)

Actually, you could not because it started to lean as they were building
it and they tried to compensate. But if you could correct it, you would
remove all interest from the image.

--
.~. Jean-David Beyer Registered Linux User 85642.
/V\ Registered Machine 241939.
/( )\ Shrewsbury, New Jersey http://counter.li.org
^^-^^ 13:40:00 up 10 days, 23 min, 3 users, load average: 4.38, 4.18, 4.11

  #5  
Old September 19th 04, 02:04 AM
jjs
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Jean-David Beyer" wrote in message
...

Hey! By adjusting the camera properly, you can make the leaning tower of
Pisa stand up straight. ;-)


As you mentioned (Snipped, sorry), the Piza is truly remarkable. They made
all kinds of adjustments in its balance to make it work out. Left, right,
down balance, the works. Kinda reminds me of American History writers.


  #6  
Old September 19th 04, 02:04 AM
jjs
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Jean-David Beyer" wrote in message
...

Hey! By adjusting the camera properly, you can make the leaning tower of
Pisa stand up straight. ;-)


As you mentioned (Snipped, sorry), the Piza is truly remarkable. They made
all kinds of adjustments in its balance to make it work out. Left, right,
down balance, the works. Kinda reminds me of American History writers.


  #7  
Old September 19th 04, 04:34 AM
Jorge Gasteazoro
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"jjs" wrote in message ...
While I think of it - for new viewcamera people - So you leveled your
camera, made perfect rise, triple checked all levels and the building is
still not level in the frame? Newsflash. Many old buildings are not
level! You might level the roof and find some doors, walls or windows
canted, or visa-versa. Funny how we don't always notice that in the frame,
but at the leisure of the lighttable, *argh*.

So, is it better to just show the building As Is or go to the fantastic
trouble of making it "look right"? Your decision.



This is very prevalent here in Mexico. you can stay trying to level
everything until the cows come home and you will always get a door
way, column, or wall leaning one way or other. The trick is to balance
everything so that the composition is pleasant. In photo.net, there is
athread about a person buying a special gizmo to level the camera to
the tune of $500, he better not come to Mexico or he is going to be
very frustrated....:-)
  #8  
Old September 19th 04, 04:34 AM
Jorge Gasteazoro
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"jjs" wrote in message ...
While I think of it - for new viewcamera people - So you leveled your
camera, made perfect rise, triple checked all levels and the building is
still not level in the frame? Newsflash. Many old buildings are not
level! You might level the roof and find some doors, walls or windows
canted, or visa-versa. Funny how we don't always notice that in the frame,
but at the leisure of the lighttable, *argh*.

So, is it better to just show the building As Is or go to the fantastic
trouble of making it "look right"? Your decision.



This is very prevalent here in Mexico. you can stay trying to level
everything until the cows come home and you will always get a door
way, column, or wall leaning one way or other. The trick is to balance
everything so that the composition is pleasant. In photo.net, there is
athread about a person buying a special gizmo to level the camera to
the tune of $500, he better not come to Mexico or he is going to be
very frustrated....:-)
  #9  
Old September 19th 04, 05:05 AM
Argon3
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Well, I think that I rremember that even ol' Ansel admonished us that we should
keep some distortion in a photograph because it looks unnatural when a building
appears to be completely rectilinear.

argon
  #10  
Old September 19th 04, 05:05 AM
Argon3
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Well, I think that I rremember that even ol' Ansel admonished us that we should
keep some distortion in a photograph because it looks unnatural when a building
appears to be completely rectilinear.

argon
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Canon i560 Ink Level Indicator Jeff Digital Photography 6 September 7th 04 04:27 PM
Linhof Technica back movements jjs Large Format Photography Equipment 25 August 19th 04 04:34 AM
Entry level body with spot metering? OnePrivateIndividual 35mm Photo Equipment 4 June 18th 04 09:21 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:12 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.