7D2 vs D7100 @ 6400

Savageduck wrote:
On 2014-09-28 22:50:42 +0000, Eric Stevens said:

On Sun, 28 Sep 2014 10:57:44 +0200, android wrote:

You obviously don't know what ad hock is.
Of course I do. It's a German white wine dished out by
advertising
agencies.

Oh! For a moment I thought it might be advertising
material traded for cash at a pawnshop.

Aren't all these definitions, including Android's, just a little
but Ad Hoc?


--
Floyd L. Davidson http://www.apaflo.com/
Ukpeagvik (Barrow, Alaska)

On 2014-09-28 23:34:08 +0000, (Floyd L. Davidson) said:

Savageduck wrote:
On 2014-09-28 22:50:42 +0000, Eric Stevens said:

On Sun, 28 Sep 2014 10:57:44 +0200, android wrote:

You obviously don't know what ad hock is.
Of course I do. It's a German white wine dished out by
advertising
agencies.

Oh! For a moment I thought it might be advertising
material traded for cash at a pawnshop.

Aren't all these definitions, including Android's, just a little
but Ad Hoc?

You might say android's extraneous "K" was just too tempting as a target. ;-)

--
Regards,

Savageduck

Savageduck wrote:
On 2014-09-28 23:34:08 +0000, (Floyd L. Davidson) said:

Savageduck wrote:
On 2014-09-28 22:50:42 +0000, Eric Stevens said:

On Sun, 28 Sep 2014 10:57:44 +0200, android wrote:

You obviously don't know what ad hock is.
Of course I do. It's a German white wine dished out by
advertising
agencies.
Oh! For a moment I thought it might be advertising
material traded for cash at a pawnshop.
Aren't all these definitions, including Android's,
just a little
but Ad Hoc?

You might say android's extraneous "K" was just too tempting as a target. ;-)

Poor guy missed on all counts with that silly crack.

--
Floyd L. Davidson http://www.apaflo.com/
Ukpeagvik (Barrow, Alaska)

In article ,
(Floyd L. Davidson) wrote:

Savageduck wrote:
On 2014-09-28 23:34:08 +0000, (Floyd L. Davidson) said:

Savageduck wrote:
On 2014-09-28 22:50:42 +0000, Eric Stevens said:

On Sun, 28 Sep 2014 10:57:44 +0200, android wrote:

You obviously don't know what ad hock is.
Of course I do. It's a German white wine dished out by
advertising
agencies.
Oh! For a moment I thought it might be advertising
material traded for cash at a pawnshop.

It's also a fish! ;-p

Aren't all these definitions, including Android's,
just a little
but Ad Hoc?

You might say android's extraneous "K" was just too tempting as a target. ;-)

You need something to do. Get yourself a better camera...

Poor guy missed on all counts with that silly crack.

Spling aside... Spelling contests are fun arn't they? Nevermind...
You don't now the meaning of ad hoc nor in general or in context.
Your own writing proves that!
--
teleportation kills
http://tinyurl.com/androidphotography

android wrote:
In article ,
(Floyd L. Davidson) wrote:

Savageduck wrote:
On 2014-09-28 23:34:08 +0000, (Floyd L. Davidson) said:

Savageduck wrote:
On 2014-09-28 22:50:42 +0000, Eric Stevens said:

On Sun, 28 Sep 2014 10:57:44 +0200, android wrote:

You obviously don't know what ad hock is.
Of course I do. It's a German white wine dished out by
advertising
agencies.
Oh! For a moment I thought it might be advertising
material traded for cash at a pawnshop.

It's also a fish! ;-p

Aren't all these definitions, including Android's,
just a little
but Ad Hoc?

You might say android's extraneous "K" was just too tempting as a target. ;-)

You need something to do. Get yourself a better camera...

Poor guy missed on all counts with that silly crack.

Spling aside... Spelling contests are fun arn't they? Nevermind...
You don't now the meaning of ad hoc nor in general or in context.
Your own writing proves that!

The fact is that *every* conversion from raw sensor data
to any specific image is Ad Hoc. There is no general
correct conversion configuration, and there are no rules
for what will produce a correct image. In fact almost
any conversion, regardless of the configuration, is just
as correct as the next. It's just an Ad Hoc decision
based on specifics decided by the person configuring the
RAW converter for that specific image.

Which is to say, it's about as Ad Hoc as anything can
be.

--
Floyd L. Davidson http://www.apaflo.com/
Ukpeagvik (Barrow, Alaska)

On 2014-09-29 02:32:43 +0000, android said:

In article ,
(Floyd L. Davidson) wrote:

Savageduck wrote:
On 2014-09-28 23:34:08 +0000, (Floyd L. Davidson) said:

Savageduck wrote:
On 2014-09-28 22:50:42 +0000, Eric Stevens said:

On Sun, 28 Sep 2014 10:57:44 +0200, android wrote:

You obviously don't know what ad hock is.
Of course I do. It's a German white wine dished out by
advertising
agencies.
Oh! For a moment I thought it might be advertising
material traded for cash at a pawnshop.

It's also a fish! ;-p

Aren't all these definitions, including Android's,
just a little
but Ad Hoc?

You might say android's extraneous "K" was just too tempting as a target. ;-)

You need something to do. Get yourself a better camera...

https://db.tt/Bu6Igvz5



--
Regards,

Savageduck

In article ,
(Floyd L. Davidson) wrote:

android wrote:
In article ,
(Floyd L. Davidson) wrote:

Savageduck wrote:
On 2014-09-28 23:34:08 +0000, (Floyd L. Davidson) said:

Savageduck wrote:
On 2014-09-28 22:50:42 +0000, Eric Stevens
said:

On Sun, 28 Sep 2014 10:57:44 +0200, android wrote:

You obviously don't know what ad hock is.
Of course I do. It's a German white wine dished out by
advertising
agencies.
Oh! For a moment I thought it might be advertising
material traded for cash at a pawnshop.

It's also a fish! ;-p

Aren't all these definitions, including Android's,
just a little
but Ad Hoc?

You might say android's extraneous "K" was just too tempting as a target.
;-)

You need something to do. Get yourself a better camera...

Poor guy missed on all counts with that silly crack.

Spling aside... Spelling contests are fun arn't they? Nevermind...
You don't now the meaning of ad hoc nor in general or in context.
Your own writing proves that!

The fact is that *every* conversion from raw sensor data
to any specific image is Ad Hoc. There is no general
correct conversion configuration, and there are no rules
for what will produce a correct image. In fact almost
any conversion, regardless of the configuration, is just
as correct as the next. It's just an Ad Hoc decision
based on specifics decided by the person configuring the
RAW converter for that specific image.

No, ad hoc is make do... A raw conversion without profiling is only half
done. Using other cameras profiles is make do, i e ad hoc.
--
teleportation kills
http://tinyurl.com/androidphotography

In article 201409281953108623-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom,
Savageduck wrote:

On 2014-09-29 02:32:43 +0000, android said:

In article ,
(Floyd L. Davidson) wrote:

Savageduck wrote:
On 2014-09-28 23:34:08 +0000, (Floyd L. Davidson) said:

Savageduck wrote:
On 2014-09-28 22:50:42 +0000, Eric Stevens
said:

On Sun, 28 Sep 2014 10:57:44 +0200, android wrote:

You obviously don't know what ad hock is.
Of course I do. It's a German white wine dished out by
advertising
agencies.
Oh! For a moment I thought it might be advertising
material traded for cash at a pawnshop.

It's also a fish! ;-p

Aren't all these definitions, including Android's,
just a little
but Ad Hoc?

You might say android's extraneous "K" was just too tempting as a target.
;-)

You need something to do. Get yourself a better camera...

https://db.tt/Bu6Igvz5

;-p
--
teleportation kills
http://tinyurl.com/androidphotography

android wrote:
In article ,
(Floyd L. Davidson) wrote:

android wrote:
In article ,
(Floyd L. Davidson) wrote:

Savageduck wrote:
On 2014-09-28 23:34:08 +0000, (Floyd L. Davidson) said:

Savageduck wrote:
On 2014-09-28 22:50:42 +0000, Eric Stevens
said:

On Sun, 28 Sep 2014 10:57:44 +0200, android wrote:

You obviously don't know what ad hock is.
Of course I do. It's a German white wine dished out by
advertising
agencies.
Oh! For a moment I thought it might be advertising
material traded for cash at a pawnshop.

It's also a fish! ;-p

Aren't all these definitions, including Android's,
just a little
but Ad Hoc?

You might say android's extraneous "K" was just too tempting as a target.
;-)

You need something to do. Get yourself a better camera...

Poor guy missed on all counts with that silly crack.

Spling aside... Spelling contests are fun arn't they? Nevermind...
You don't now the meaning of ad hoc nor in general or in context.
Your own writing proves that!

The fact is that *every* conversion from raw sensor data
to any specific image is Ad Hoc. There is no general
correct conversion configuration, and there are no rules
for what will produce a correct image. In fact almost
any conversion, regardless of the configuration, is just
as correct as the next. It's just an Ad Hoc decision
based on specifics decided by the person configuring the
RAW converter for that specific image.

No, ad hoc is make do... A raw conversion without profiling is only half
done. Using other cameras profiles is make do, i e ad hoc.

"Make do" has nothing to do with Ad Hoc. Whether a conversion is
done with or without profiling (which isn't even a part of the
conversion anyway) has nothing to do with whether it is Ad Hoc.
Even if it were half done, that has nothing to do with Ad Hoc.

Look it up in a dictionary!

Ad Hoc means it is a specific instance, improvised or impromptu or
for a specific purpose. That is as opposed to one that follows a
general pattern, is totally planned ahead of time and is not at
all customized.

--
Floyd L. Davidson http://www.apaflo.com/
Ukpeagvik (Barrow, Alaska)

In article ,
(Floyd L. Davidson) wrote:

"Make do" has nothing to do with Ad Hoc. Whether a conversion is
done with or without profiling (which isn't even a part of the
conversion anyway) has nothing to do with whether it is Ad Hoc.
Even if it were half done, that has nothing to do with Ad Hoc.

Look it up in a dictionary!

Learn to read.

Ad Hoc means it is a specific instance, improvised or impromptu or
for a specific purpose.

Another way to spell make do...

That is as opposed to one that follows a
general pattern, is totally planned ahead of time and is not at
all customized.

As said...
--
teleportation kills
http://tinyurl.com/androidphotography