A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Digital Photography » Digital Photography
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Sharpening



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old April 1st 13, 09:56 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
nospam
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 24,165
Default Sharpening

In article , Wolfgang
Weisselberg wrote:

Floyd L. Davidson wrote:
..snip..


I expect your apology and you to concede you were wrong.


from floyd?? don't hold your breath on that one.
  #22  
Old April 1st 13, 10:52 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
nospam
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 24,165
Default Sharpening

In article , Wolfgang
Weisselberg wrote:

Have you tried High Pass sharpening?
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/tu...arpening.shtml


Thanks for this pointer. It is my new favorite method of sharpening.
Because
it is a layer, it is entirely reversible at any time, unlike USM.


You can put USM (set on the strong side) on a separate layer and
change it's opacity. And of course you can use a layer mask
to only apply at the edges.


with a non-destructive workflow, everything is reversible and
adjustable at any time, including usm.
  #23  
Old April 2nd 13, 07:54 PM
Harold Gough Harold Gough is offline
Member
 
First recorded activity by PhotoBanter: Mar 2008
Posts: 31
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nospam View Post
In article , Wolfgang
Weisselberg
wrote:

Have you tried High Pass sharpening?
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/tu...arpening.shtml


Thanks for this pointer. It is my new favorite method of sharpening.
Because
it is a layer, it is entirely reversible at any time, unlike USM.


You can put USM (set on the strong side) on a separate layer and
change it's opacity. And of course you can use a layer mask
to only apply at the edges.


with a non-destructive workflow, everything is reversible and
adjustable at any time, including usm.
I find some of the options in Topaz Detail 2 less coarse than USM, notably Feature Enhancement or Micro Contrast Enhancement.
  #24  
Old April 3rd 13, 06:57 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
Douglas Johnson[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 107
Default Sharpening

Tony Cooper wrote:.

Why "unlike USM"? When I use any form of sharpening I make it on a
new layer. If I don't like the effect, I delete the layer.


I learned something today. Thanks.
-- Doug
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
RAW and sharpening BF Digital SLR Cameras 6 January 11th 08 05:40 PM
Sharpening Ockham's Razor Digital Photography 11 February 6th 07 09:35 PM
Am I over-sharpening? Walter Dnes (delete the 'z' to get my real address Digital Photography 12 February 9th 06 07:58 AM
RAW sharpening embee Digital Photography 11 December 24th 04 04:43 PM
D70 on-camera sharpening vs. Photoshop sharpening john Digital Photography 7 July 23rd 04 10:55 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.