If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
actual printers vs dye transfer prints
On Wed, 12 Oct 2005 09:41:13 -0400, Robert Feinman
wrote: Anything you could do as an adjustment can now be done easier and better with digital editing. Easier no doubt but better is highly subjective and questionable. New inkjet inks (both dye and pigment) are claimed to have good stability as well. So I don't see any reason to pine after the "good old days" of dye transfer. Claiming longevity is one thing, being archival is usually completely another. As has been pointed out time and again, with digital there are a lot of factors other then just the type of inks being used. The carrier for pigments is one significant concern. === Regards, John Douglas - Formula, Documents & Manuals for the Silver Darkroom Websites : http://www.darkroompro.com - http://www.puresilver.org |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
actual printers vs dye transfer prints | [email protected] | Digital Photography | 0 | October 14th 05 12:13 PM |
ISO and actual sensitivity in DSLR's (D70, *istD, 20D, S3...) | Alan Browne | Digital SLR Cameras | 138 | March 30th 05 07:28 PM |
Transfer image to canvas | Tim | Digital Photography | 22 | October 12th 04 06:07 PM |
Digital darkroom | Paul Friday | Medium Format Photography Equipment | 84 | July 9th 04 05:26 AM |
Archival inksets for inkjet printers. | Steve House | In The Darkroom | 29 | February 10th 04 10:52 PM |