7D2 vs D7100 @ 6400

In article ,
Whisky-dave wrote:

On Wednesday, 1 October 2014 15:42:01 UTC+1, android wrote:
In article ,

Whisky-dave wrote:



On Wednesday, 1 October 2014 09:44:30 UTC+1, Sandman wrote:

In article , android wrote:



In article ,



Sandman:



I really do know, as opposed to you.







android:



It's some Canon, right? ;-p







Sandman:



Nope.







Not??? Do you care to enlighten us?





I already have, a week past. It's not "some" Canon, it's a very
specific

Canon.





Well here's your post exactly what specific canon are you refering to.

But you'll wriggle around yet again ...



----------------------------------------

Sandman

Sep 21

In article , android wrote:



http://www.imaging-resource.com has got a "Beta" of the 7D2 and

posted jpegs of their test targets in their camera "comperometer".

Here's a screen capture of the 7D2 vs the D7100 at ISO 6400... The

Canon's on the left: http://tinyurl.com/mhpwv5m I'm a RAW kind of

guy but it's a preview. "Half frame" fanatics should be ecstatic!



Yeah, like I said - the 7D is trounced by the D7100, and you wanted to

compare it to the D750, where it would be obliterated.



ISO6400 is Max ISO for the D7100 and the 7D goes one step further, yet at

6400 the 7D doesn't really look that much better. A pity, why can't Canon

handle image noise as good as Nikon?



I'm not W Dave...

He's not I am.

Good to know...
--
teleportation kills
http://tinyurl.com/androidphotography

In article , Whisky-dave wrote:

Sandman:
I already have, a week past. It's not "some" Canon, it's a very
specific Canon.

Well here's your post exactly what specific canon are you refering
to. But you'll wriggle around yet again ...

I explained that on 21 of september, Dave. Here are all the posts you've
made since my explanation where you still don't understand:

01: 2014-09-22


02: 2014-09-22


03: 2014-09-22


04: 2014-09-23


05: 2014-09-23


06: 2014-09-24


07: 2014-09-24


08: 2014-09-25


09: 2014-09-25


10: 2014-09-26


11: 2014-09-26


12: 2014-09-26


13: 2014-09-29


14: 2014-10-01


15: 2014-10-01





--
Sandman[.net]

In article , android wrote:

In article ,

android:
In article ,

Sandman:
I really do know, as opposed to you.

android:
It's some Canon, right? ;-p

Sandman:
Nope.

android:
Not??? Do you care to enlighten us?

Sandman:
I already have, a week past. It's not "some" Canon, it's a very
specific Canon.

Ahh... You're talking 'bout 7d and not 7d! That clears everything up
neatly. Not the 1dx or something, obviously. You're soo padded cell
material!

So, you didn't understand the plain english post I made on september 21st
either? You and drunk Dave are in the padded cell together, mayhaps?




--
Sandman[.net]

In article , android wrote:

In article ,
Sandman wrote:

In article ,
Whisky-dave wrote:

Sandman:
I really do know, as opposed to you.

snip quote of me knowing what I'm talking about

Let's repeat, here is where I explained myself:

Sandman
7D2 vs D7100 @ 6400
09/21/2014

"It's all you've got, troll. I've been talking about the Mark
II the entire time. I just think Canon's naming scheme is
stupid. It's the new version of the 7D. Focus on irrelevant
things instead of staying focused on facts, Android."

That's on 21 of september, these are the posts you posted where you're
still confused:

I'm not W Dave...

Who said you were? Showcasing your poor reading comprehension again?


--
Sandman[.net]

In article ,
Sandman wrote:

In article , android wrote:

In article ,

android:
In article ,

Sandman:
I really do know, as opposed to you.

android:
It's some Canon, right? ;-p

Sandman:
Nope.

android:
Not??? Do you care to enlighten us?

Sandman:
I already have, a week past. It's not "some" Canon, it's a very
specific Canon.

Ahh... You're talking 'bout 7d and not 7d! That clears everything up
neatly. Not the 1dx or something, obviously. You're soo padded cell
material!

So, you didn't understand the plain english post I made on september 21st
either?

For the record:

In article , android
wrote:

In article ,
Sandman wrote:

Why can't you read? The 7D is *slightly* better

The thread is still about the 7D2 and D7100. Not the 7D and whatever...
--
teleportation kills
http://tinyurl.com/androidphotography

In article ,
Sandman wrote:

"It's all you've got, troll. I've been talking about the Mark
II the entire time. I just think Canon's naming scheme is
stupid. It's the new version of the 7D. Focus on irrelevant
things instead of staying focused on facts, Android."

---
I'm not W Dave...

Who said you were? Showcasing your poor reading comprehension again?

You're a silly old fart...
--
teleportation kills
http://tinyurl.com/androidphotography

In article , android wrote:

android:
Ahh... You're talking 'bout 7d and not 7d! That clears
everything up neatly. Not the 1dx or something, obviously.
You're soo padded cell material!

Sandman:
So, you didn't understand the plain english post I made on
september 21st either?

For the record:

A simple "No, English is way too hard for me" would have sufficed.


--
Sandman[.net]

In article , Whisky-dave wrote:

Sandman:
So, you didn't understand the plain english post I made on
september 21st either? You and drunk Dave are in the padded cell
together, mayhaps?

It takes someone or incredible stuipidity to not understand what
plain English is when others point it out and they still don't get
it.

Indeed - and here you are, being incredibly stupid.

Well done sandman

Thank you. I aim to please.


--
Sandman[.net]

In article , android wrote:

In article ,

Sandman:
"It's all you've got, troll. I've been talking about the Mark
II the entire time. I just think Canon's naming scheme is
stupid. It's the new version of the 7D. Focus on irrelevant
things instead of staying focused on facts, Android."

android:
I'm not W Dave...

Sandman:
Who said you were? Showcasing your poor reading comprehension
again?

You're a silly old fart...

Why can't you answer the question?


--
Sandman[.net]

In article ,
Sandman wrote:

In article , android wrote:

In article ,

Sandman:
"It's all you've got, troll. I've been talking about the Mark
II the entire time. I just think Canon's naming scheme is
stupid. It's the new version of the 7D. Focus on irrelevant
things instead of staying focused on facts, Android."

android:
I'm not W Dave...

Sandman:
Who said you were? Showcasing your poor reading comprehension
again?

You're a silly old fart...

Why can't you answer the question?

Showcasing your poor reading comprehension again?
--
teleportation kills
http://tinyurl.com/androidphotography