If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Photographing eyeballs.
Anybody ever took a photo of the
interior of the eye? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Photographing eyeballs.
"irwell" wrote in message ... Anybody ever took a photo of the interior of the eye? Yep. Owner was dead. H. (Med photographer at one time) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Photographing eyeballs.
irwell wrote: Anybody ever took a photo of the interior of the eye? Yes, but the guy whose eye I cut open was really ****ed about it when he woke up! |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Photographing eyeballs.
irwell wrote: Anybody ever took a photo of the interior of the eye? It is almost a routine check these days for glaucoma suffers or people at risk and over 40. Many opticians have suitable kit for this. I think mostly made by Nikon. Obviously they only image the retina (which is the active sensor part at high risk). Regards, Martin Brown |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Photographing eyeballs.
On Tue, 05 Sep 2006 18:54:26 +0100, irwell wrote:
Anybody ever took a photo of the interior of the eye? Ophthalmologists do it every day. See here http://webvision.med.utah.edu/sretina.html or do a google image search for retina -- Gautam Majumdar Please send e-mails to |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Photographing eyeballs.
irwell wrote: Anybody ever took a photo of the interior of the eye? Do it every day why? Tom |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Photographing eyeballs.
Martin Brown wrote: irwell wrote: Anybody ever took a photo of the interior of the eye? It is almost a routine check these days for glaucoma suffers or people at risk and over 40. Many opticians have suitable kit for this. I think mostly made by Nikon. Obviously they only image the retina (which is the active sensor part at high risk). Regards, Martin Brown Actually Nikon is out of the business. My equipment is Canon and Zeiss, software by a specialty company, camera back an industrial 5mp. Other manufacturers are Topcon and Kowa, Olympus outside the US. Tom |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Photographing eyeballs.
The ophthalmogist see different patients every day and they want to
record the state of the patient's retina for caparison at a later date to see if there is improvement in the patients condition or not. Much like a dentist keep x-rays of your mouth take at different times. You may see him only look at the current, but sometimes they look at before and after images to evaluate the progress that has been made. tomm42 wrote: irwell wrote: Anybody ever took a photo of the interior of the eye? Do it every day why? Tom |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Photographing eyeballs.
Let me be a little more specific, I have been photographing retinas and
photographing other aspects of ophthalmology for 30 years. Since the question is about retinal photography here it is in a nutshell. The retina is photographed mostly by a camera with a very complex optical design. What has to be done is creating the image and illuminating the image theough the same aperture, the dilated pupil, without refections, or stray light in the image.This is done by placing a ring of light on the outside edge of the pupil and using the area inside the to send the image back to the sensor, film or digital (about 70 % digital now). We photograph both passive and active tests. We do these images for 1) documentation of a condition 2) to give the MD a guide for laser treatment of the retina Beside glaucoma this test is done for diseases such as diabetes, macular degeneration, high blood pressure, ms and other systemic diseases. If you have any other questions just ask. Tom |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Photographing eyeballs.
irwell wrote:
Anybody ever took a photo of the interior of the eye? Yes. I am a borderline diabetic and the hospital takes annual shots of my retinas to check for any problems - none so far, thank god. But, they use a digital camera system with an absolutely humungus flash that almost incinerated my eye. The first time, I reeled back and said 'Jesus H Christ, what the f*** was that for?' The operator was a bit shocked at my reaction, so I invited him to sit where I was and I would give him a dose to see what he thought. I told him I was a photographer, and that amount of flash was enough to light up the bloody City Hall, let alone an eyeball. I'd already had atropine drops to enlarge the iris, and I was literally blind for some time after the flash. Next time I must ask him whether the flash is filtered for UV and IR, both of which could cause permanent damage. They use high-power flash to kill hair follicles, so what will it do to your retina, I ask? Colin D. -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Photographing the Sun with a D70s | Robert | Digital SLR Cameras | 12 | March 28th 06 04:32 AM |
Photographing the public in public displays - Legalities and more? | WhoTurnedOffTheLights | Digital Photography | 44 | November 16th 05 07:52 AM |
Photographing Inscriptions: Nikon Coolpix 8800 or Canon Dig Rebel XT? | dmango1 | Digital SLR Cameras | 6 | July 2nd 05 01:34 AM |
Books on Composition, developing an "Eye"? | William J. Slater | General Photography Techniques | 9 | April 7th 04 04:22 PM |
photographing moose in the "Anchorage Hillside" area? | Bill Hilton | Photographing Nature | 4 | March 9th 04 08:03 PM |