If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Your opinion of Canon 400D
Todd H. wrote:
"Pete D" writes: Don't over-generalize, it's usually wrong. :^) Generally speaking of course! ;-) And the corollary: Nearly half of all people you meet are below average. .....of the population of the people I meet. But many of us are fortunate enough to not have to meet a lot of people of average or below average intelligence, and that applies to many NGs.... == -- john mcwilliams |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Your opinion of Canon 400D
"Pete D" writes:
Don't over-generalize, it's usually wrong. :^) Generally speaking of course! ;-) And the corollary: Nearly half of all people you meet are below average. Best Regards, -- Todd H. http://www.toddh.net/ |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Your opinion of Canon 400D
MarkČ wrote:
I would never wish to require an overly-bright screen, The killer defect on the 30D is the far-too-dim color screen. It is barely invisible in sunny areas even if you shade it and shield your eyes. And it is **THE** vital feature, since it is what has the histogram to tell if you overexposed something. With the dead-end cutoff of brightness levels of digital, you need to check every shot. Doug McDonald |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Your opinion of Canon 400D
On Tue, 23 Jan 2007 07:44:34 -0600, Doug McDonald
wrote: MarkČ wrote: I would never wish to require an overly-bright screen, The killer defect on the 30D is the far-too-dim color screen. It is barely invisible in sunny areas even if you shade it and shield your eyes. And it is **THE** vital feature, since it is what has the histogram to tell if you overexposed something. With the dead-end cutoff of brightness levels of digital, you need to check every shot. I am curious as to what kind of photography you do that requires that you check every shot. Personally if it's a stationary subject I autobracket and worry about it later, and if it's a transient subject then I can't reshoot it anyway. But then I'm used to working with cameras that don't even have a meter. Doug McDonald |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Your opinion of Canon 400D
Doug McDonald wrote:
MarkČ wrote: I would never wish to require an overly-bright screen, The killer defect on the 30D is the far-too-dim color screen. It is barely invisible in sunny areas even if you shade it and shield your eyes. And it is **THE** vital feature, since it is what has the histogram to tell if you overexposed something. With the dead-end cutoff of brightness levels of digital, you need to check every shot. Doug McDonald My 300D has variable brightness for the lcd screen, accessible in the menu. I run mine at 2 (out of 5), and it's adequately bright. Have you tried increasing the 30D's lcd brightness? - assuming you have one, and are not just commenting on a quick look in a camera store, where the brightness could have been fiddled anywhere. Colin D. -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Your opinion of Canon 400D
Colin_D wrote:
My 300D has variable brightness for the lcd screen, accessible in the menu. I run mine at 2 (out of 5), and it's adequately bright. Have you tried increasing the 30D's lcd brightness? - assuming you have one, and are not just commenting on a quick look in a camera store, where the brightness could have been fiddled anywhere. Oh I have one, and I have it set to max brightness. It's OK except in sunlight (and no, looking away from the sun and shielding the screen with my hands just isn't quite good enough). Doug McDonald |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Your opinion of Canon 400D
On Tue, 23 Jan 2007 17:40:19 -0600, Doug McDonald
wrote: Colin_D wrote: My 300D has variable brightness for the lcd screen, accessible in the menu. I run mine at 2 (out of 5), and it's adequately bright. Have you tried increasing the 30D's lcd brightness? - assuming you have one, and are not just commenting on a quick look in a camera store, where the brightness could have been fiddled anywhere. Oh I have one, and I have it set to max brightness. It's OK except in sunlight (and no, looking away from the sun and shielding the screen with my hands just isn't quite good enough). Doug McDonald I don't have a real problem with my 30D. I'm thinking this must be a personal thing. I don't have this problem with my FX01, or our S2IS, either, though some insist they can't see a thing in their LCDs in the sun. -- Washington Post humorist Art Buchwald was eulogized by friends Friday after a long and hilarious career. Reports of his death may be exaggerated. Every comedian thought he had died and gone to heaven when Hillary Clinton announced she is running for president. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Your opinion of Canon 400D
"Doug McDonald" wrote in message
... Oh I have one, and I have it set to max brightness. It's OK except in sunlight (and no, looking away from the sun and shielding the screen with my hands just isn't quite good enough). Hopefully this isn't too stupid of a question, but are you wearing polarized sunglasses to see the LCD? The light coming from an LCD is polarized and if the angle is right, it will go black with sunglasses. |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Your opinion of Canon 400D
Doug McDonald wrote:
Colin_D wrote: My 300D has variable brightness for the lcd screen, accessible in the menu. I run mine at 2 (out of 5), and it's adequately bright. Have you tried increasing the 30D's lcd brightness? - assuming you have one, and are not just commenting on a quick look in a camera store, where the brightness could have been fiddled anywhere. Oh I have one, and I have it set to max brightness. It's OK except in sunlight (and no, looking away from the sun and shielding the screen with my hands just isn't quite good enough). Doug McDonald My 5D has the same screen, and it's fine, though certainly not "pretty" in bright sunlight. But honestly, here...anyone relying on the displayed IMAGE is kidding themselves if they're using that to determine proper exposure--if for no other reason than the fact that conditions will ALWAYS effect the accuracy...not the least of which being your brightness settings. The only real and trustworthy indicator on ANY camera's review screen is of understanding and use of the histgram display (info disdplay on Canons). The simple histogram display is certainly readable in even the brightest of conditions. -- Images (Plus Snaps & Grabs) by MarkČ at: www.pbase.com/markuson |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Your opinion of Canon 400D
default wrote:
"Doug McDonald" wrote in message ... Oh I have one, and I have it set to max brightness. It's OK except in sunlight (and no, looking away from the sun and shielding the screen with my hands just isn't quite good enough). Hopefully this isn't too stupid of a question, but are you wearing polarized sunglasses to see the LCD? The light coming from an LCD is polarized and if the angle is right, it will go black with sunglasses. I'm sure there are plenty of people who have no clue what's going on when wearing their Maui Jims... -- Images (Plus Snaps & Grabs) by MarkČ at: www.pbase.com/markuson |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Canon 400D | [email protected] | Digital SLR Cameras | 7 | November 12th 06 08:53 PM |
Canon 400d RAW conversions | Bill Hilton | Digital Photography | 5 | November 6th 06 03:34 PM |
which lens to get for Canon 400D? | Stimp | Digital Photography | 15 | October 14th 06 06:02 AM |
Canon 400D | Jack | Digital SLR Cameras | 54 | August 29th 06 09:38 PM |
Canon 400D - DSLR | sharkbait999 | Digital Photography | 25 | August 26th 06 06:17 AM |