If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
Lightroom 6
In article ,
Savageduck wrote: There is also the rumor that LR6 will be the last standalone edition of Lightroom with only new RAW profile being added to the LR ACR engine. that rumour is nothing more than uninformed idiots spreading fud. adobe has said on numerous occasions that lightroom will always be available in both standalone and subscription. end of story. obviously that could change, as can anything. adobe could even cancel lightroom entirely. there are no guarantees. however, that's highly unlikely since lightroom is extremely popular. in other words, there will be a lightroom 7 and beyond. The rumor was started by Scott Kelby. the rumour strated with adobe saying no new features in lightroom 6. some people have taken to mean there won't be any more releases of lightroom, ever. that's pure nonsense. what it actually means is that lightroom 6 users must wait until lightroom 7 is released for new features, while lightroom cc users get the new features as they are developed and released. that's one of the key differences between cc and non-cc. you don't have to wait 18-24 months to get updates. He feels that it is easier for Adobe to manage further Lightroom development using the CC model. That it has taken over two years to get to this LR 6/CC release with all it has that is new. That the CC along with the CC libraries will improve PS-LR integration, allowing for incremental updates as needed rather than the long wait for a new major release. He seems to feel that LR6 will join PS CS6 for those folks who don't want to buy into the CC model, and which will only be supported with new ACR RAW profiles. He might be right, but for now it is just speculation. he's wrong. |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Lightroom 6
On 2015-04-22 16:07:32 +0000, nospam said:
In article , Savageduck wrote: There is also the rumor that LR6 will be the last standalone edition of Lightroom with only new RAW profile being added to the LR ACR engine. that rumour is nothing more than uninformed idiots spreading fud. adobe has said on numerous occasions that lightroom will always be available in both standalone and subscription. end of story. obviously that could change, as can anything. adobe could even cancel lightroom entirely. there are no guarantees. however, that's highly unlikely since lightroom is extremely popular. in other words, there will be a lightroom 7 and beyond. The rumor was started by Scott Kelby. the rumour strated with adobe saying no new features in lightroom 6. In or after? There are certainly new features in LR6. some people have taken to mean there won't be any more releases of lightroom, ever. that's pure nonsense. They have taken that to mean there will be no more standalone Lightroom releases, whether that turns out to be fact is something we shall have to see what the future will bring. There will certainly be new releases of Lightroom for CC subscribers. Perhaps in another two years, Lightroom 6 might be considered Adobe's "D300S". One of those things that is waited for with painful anticipation, and which never materializes. what it actually means is that lightroom 6 users must wait until lightroom 7 is released for new features, while lightroom cc users get the new features as they are developed and released. ....and your interpretation of just what Adobe actually means, and intends is just as speculative as anything you have stated here. that's one of the key differences between cc and non-cc. you don't have to wait 18-24 months to get updates. Agreed! ...and the price of updates for PS & LR is more than the cost of a CC subscription. He feels that it is easier for Adobe to manage further Lightroom development using the CC model. That it has taken over two years to get to this LR 6/CC release with all it has that is new. That the CC along with the CC libraries will improve PS-LR integration, allowing for incremental updates as needed rather than the long wait for a new major release. He seems to feel that LR6 will join PS CS6 for those folks who don't want to buy into the CC model, and which will only be supported with new ACR RAW profiles. He might be right, but for now it is just speculation. he's wrong. Too soon to tell. -- Regards, Savageduck |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Lightroom 6
In article ,
Savageduck wrote: the rumour strated with adobe saying no new features in lightroom 6. In or after? There are certainly new features in LR6. after. the new features will appear in lightroom 7. lightroom cc users get them as they happen, without needing to wait for a release cycle. some people have taken to mean there won't be any more releases of lightroom, ever. that's pure nonsense. They have taken that to mean there will be no more standalone Lightroom releases, whether that turns out to be fact is something we shall have to see what the future will bring. There will certainly be new releases of Lightroom for CC subscribers. there's no need to wait. adobe has repeatedly said lightroom will continue to be offered in both standalone and subscription. they could be lying but that is not likely. |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Lightroom 6
On Wed, 22 Apr 2015 12:39:45 -0400, nospam
wrote: In article , Savageduck wrote: the rumour strated with adobe saying no new features in lightroom 6. In or after? There are certainly new features in LR6. after. the new features will appear in lightroom 7. lightroom cc users get them as they happen, without needing to wait for a release cycle. some people have taken to mean there won't be any more releases of lightroom, ever. that's pure nonsense. They have taken that to mean there will be no more standalone Lightroom releases, whether that turns out to be fact is something we shall have to see what the future will bring. There will certainly be new releases of Lightroom for CC subscribers. there's no need to wait. adobe has repeatedly said lightroom will continue to be offered in both standalone and subscription. they could be lying but that is not likely. This whole thing might go back to something I read at least a couple of years ago, probably in the WSJ. They reported that Adobe had announced that all of their software was moving online, and that there would be no more boxed or standalone software. In fact, that was supposed to be imminent, so something was wrong with that report, it seems. |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Lightroom 6
In article , Bill W
wrote: This whole thing might go back to something I read at least a couple of years ago, probably in the WSJ. They reported that Adobe had announced that all of their software was moving online, and that there would be no more boxed or standalone software. In fact, that was supposed to be imminent, so something was wrong with that report, it seems. i don't know what you read but what they're doing depends on the product. photoshop and the rest of the creative suite is now subscription only, but they are continuing to offer cs6 for those who want standalone. cs6 won't be getting any new features, so there's a clear drawback to choosing that should you want one or more of the new features. the only thing that will be updated is camera raw (which is shared between lr/ps) so those with new cameras are not stuck (historically an upgrade was needed). lightroom is offered in either standalone or subscription. some features only exist with the subscription version, such as sharing between desktop and mobile. those who choose standalone will need to wait for lightroom 7 for new features (18-24 months, usually), while those who choose subscription get them when they're released. other apps are only standalone. |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Lightroom 6
On 4/21/2015 6:20 PM, Tony Cooper wrote:
On Tue, 21 Apr 2015 14:56:52 -0700, Savageduck wrote: But then again, I'm getting ready to fire up PS and LR to start my free trial. Once I saw that PS does motion blur correction, I just had to try it. Most of the other newer features of both programs are really of no use to me, though, and I'm sure that applies to a whole lot of people. But for $10/month, why not? Now that you are on board I suggest taking a look at some of the many tutorials: http://tv.adobe.com/show/adobe-evangelists-terry-white/ http://blogs.adobe.com/jkost/ http://tv.adobe.com/product/photoshop/ https://helpx.adobe.com/photoshop/tutorials.html http://kelbytv.com/photoshopusertv/ http://tv.adobe.com/videos/julieanne%2Dkost/ http://www.jkost.com/lightroom.html I'm getting offers every day for a free 30 day trial of Lynda.com's tutorial programs as a result of my purchase of the new Wacom tablet. I haven't signed up yet because I want a 30 window in order to utilize it, and I've got some other things coming up. I do wonder about Bill's faith in the motion blur correction filter. I hope he's not expecting a silk purse out of a sow's ear of a photo. Lynda provides some of the best and most comprehensive tutorials. -- PeterN |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Lightroom 6
On 2015-04-22 22:09:24 +0000, PeterN said:
On 4/21/2015 6:20 PM, Tony Cooper wrote: On Tue, 21 Apr 2015 14:56:52 -0700, Savageduck wrote: But then again, I'm getting ready to fire up PS and LR to start my free trial. Once I saw that PS does motion blur correction, I just had to try it. Most of the other newer features of both programs are really of no use to me, though, and I'm sure that applies to a whole lot of people. But for $10/month, why not? Now that you are on board I suggest taking a look at some of the many tutorials: http://tv.adobe.com/show/adobe-evangelists-terry-white/ http://blogs.adobe.com/jkost/ http://tv.adobe.com/product/photoshop/ https://helpx.adobe.com/photoshop/tutorials.html http://kelbytv.com/photoshopusertv/ http://tv.adobe.com/videos/julieanne%2Dkost/ http://www.jkost.com/lightroom.html I'm getting offers every day for a free 30 day trial of Lynda.com's tutorial programs as a result of my purchase of the new Wacom tablet. I haven't signed up yet because I want a 30 window in order to utilize it, and I've got some other things coming up. I do wonder about Bill's faith in the motion blur correction filter. I hope he's not expecting a silk purse out of a sow's ear of a photo. Lynda provides some of the best and most comprehensive tutorials. Agreed, and many of those are available free via the Adobe support pages. -- Regards, Savageduck |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
Lightroom 6
On Wed, 22 Apr 2015 11:11:55 +1200, Eric Stevens
wrote: On Tue, 21 Apr 2015 18:20:35 -0400, Tony Cooper wrote: On Tue, 21 Apr 2015 14:56:52 -0700, Savageduck wrote: But then again, I'm getting ready to fire up PS and LR to start my free trial. Once I saw that PS does motion blur correction, I just had to try it. Most of the other newer features of both programs are really of no use to me, though, and I'm sure that applies to a whole lot of people. But for $10/month, why not? Now that you are on board I suggest taking a look at some of the many tutorials: http://tv.adobe.com/show/adobe-evangelists-terry-white/ http://blogs.adobe.com/jkost/ http://tv.adobe.com/product/photoshop/ https://helpx.adobe.com/photoshop/tutorials.html http://kelbytv.com/photoshopusertv/ http://tv.adobe.com/videos/julieanne%2Dkost/ http://www.jkost.com/lightroom.html I'm getting offers every day for a free 30 day trial of Lynda.com's tutorial programs as a result of my purchase of the new Wacom tablet. I haven't signed up yet because I want a 30 window in order to utilize it, and I've got some other things coming up. I do wonder about Bill's faith in the motion blur correction filter. I hope he's not expecting a silk purse out of a sow's ear of a photo. Here is an example: Original https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/...3-original.jpg Antiblur https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/...-antishake.jpg I'm impressed with those results. I have a lot of photos I'd like to try this on. I'm moving on to the tutorials right now. |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
Lightroom 6
On 4/22/2015 6:21 PM, Savageduck wrote:
On 2015-04-22 22:09:24 +0000, PeterN said: On 4/21/2015 6:20 PM, Tony Cooper wrote: On Tue, 21 Apr 2015 14:56:52 -0700, Savageduck wrote: But then again, I'm getting ready to fire up PS and LR to start my free trial. Once I saw that PS does motion blur correction, I just had to try it. Most of the other newer features of both programs are really of no use to me, though, and I'm sure that applies to a whole lot of people. But for $10/month, why not? Now that you are on board I suggest taking a look at some of the many tutorials: http://tv.adobe.com/show/adobe-evangelists-terry-white/ http://blogs.adobe.com/jkost/ http://tv.adobe.com/product/photoshop/ https://helpx.adobe.com/photoshop/tutorials.html http://kelbytv.com/photoshopusertv/ http://tv.adobe.com/videos/julieanne%2Dkost/ http://www.jkost.com/lightroom.html I'm getting offers every day for a free 30 day trial of Lynda.com's tutorial programs as a result of my purchase of the new Wacom tablet. I haven't signed up yet because I want a 30 window in order to utilize it, and I've got some other things coming up. I do wonder about Bill's faith in the motion blur correction filter. I hope he's not expecting a silk purse out of a sow's ear of a photo. Lynda provides some of the best and most comprehensive tutorials. Agreed, and many of those are available free via the Adobe support pages. My Lynda subscription is free, courtesy of my local library. I have access from any Internet access point using my library card and passward. There are only a few libraries that provide a subsctiption. -- PeterN |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
Lightroom 6
On Thu, 23 Apr 2015 06:58:07 -0700 (PDT), Whisky-dave
wrote: Original https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/...3-original.jpg Antiblur https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/...-antishake.jpg I'm impressed with those results. I have a lot of photos I'd like to try this on. I'm moving on to the tutorials right now. Those looked/reminded me very much of some of my first attemps in the mid 70s. I hung my airfix models from the washing line, and using my Praktica L with out of date HP3 'pushed' to 400 ASA. What reminded me was the fact that the propellors were stationary and I thought people might think the plans weren't real, so after a few attempts I gave up on teh idea. I even thought a bit of camera shake on the model blowing in the wind might make it look more real but it didn't. That was no Airfix model. It was a real one coming over the heads of the crowd at about 300mph and less than 100'. The skies were dark and the light was atrocious. the Mosquito was at the point where panning was becoming a problem. -- Regards, Eric Stevens |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
For those new to Lightroom 5 | Savageduck[_3_] | Digital Photography | 0 | January 5th 14 01:22 AM |
PS vs Lightroom | measekite | Digital Photography | 10 | January 17th 09 11:28 PM |
Lightroom 1.3 ? | SpookiePower | Digital Photography | 10 | March 27th 08 03:04 PM |
Why Do I need Lightroom? | Annika1980 | Digital Photography | 62 | May 31st 07 05:45 PM |
Why Do I need Lightroom? | Annika1980 | 35mm Photo Equipment | 62 | May 31st 07 05:45 PM |