If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
David Nebenzahl wrote:
On 2/23/2005 3:02 AM spake thus: .... Just one thing--you don't re-use the blotters too many times, do you? Seems like a big risk of contamination otherwise (from residual chemistry in the prints). If you have residual chemistry in the print, then it has not been washed sufficiently, and the print is no good, so you might as well ditch it. Steve |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Gregory Blank wrote:
: In article , : Tom Phillips wrote: : You're likely using a screen that is not chemically inert : (as far as drying anyway.) : How do you figure that? : Drying screens should not leave : impressions in the emulsion. : No they shouldn't but it may have been a different : screen set than the current nylon? screen I use now : and what I am doing works so I ain't gonna fix it by : putting the prints face down :-) I dry my fiber prints face down on screens from Calumet (zone VI) and when I remove the dry prints prints they have the screen pattern on them. It looks like the screen made indentations in the soft wet emulsion. I am of course carefull not to drag the wet print on the screens. I've also noticed that the with time the marks fade. I've always attributed it to the emulsion relaxing with time. I'm sure that I'm all wet with what the screen pattern is and why it fades with time. All I know for sure is that the screen pattern is there when the prints first dry and after a while the screen patterns fade. My biggest problem is when I get lint, dust, etc on the screens and I don't notice until the prints are dry and the junk from the screen is embedded in the emulsion of the print. I've ruined more prints then I care to think about that way. -- Keep working millions on welfare depend on you ------------------- |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
On 2/23/2005 4:00 PM Steven spake thus:
David Nebenzahl wrote: On 2/23/2005 3:02 AM spake thus: ... Just one thing--you don't re-use the blotters too many times, do you? Seems like a big risk of contamination otherwise (from residual chemistry in the prints). If you have residual chemistry in the print, then it has not been washed sufficiently, and the print is no good, so you might as well ditch it. Well, of course; what I was getting at was the possibility that residual chemistry can be absorbed by a blotter and accumulate over time, so that eventually you have a *lot* of junk which can transfer back to prints, even if the prints have been reasonably well washed. -- "I know I will go to hell, because I pardoned Richard Nixon." - Former President Gerald Ford to his golf partners, as related by the late Hunter S. Thompson |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
In article . com,
wrote: After all else has been done prior to drying, the blotter may coax some minute additional chemistry from the print. Yes and over time those minute amounts contaminate the prints unless one chucks the blotter. -- LF Website @ http://members.verizon.net/~gregoryblank "To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public."--Theodore Roosevelt, May 7, 1918 |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
Frank Pittel wrote: Gregory Blank wrote: : In article , : Tom Phillips wrote: : You're likely using a screen that is not chemically inert : (as far as drying anyway.) : How do you figure that? : Drying screens should not leave : impressions in the emulsion. : No they shouldn't but it may have been a different : screen set than the current nylon? screen I use now : and what I am doing works so I ain't gonna fix it by : putting the prints face down :-) I dry my fiber prints face down on screens from Calumet (zone VI) and when I remove the dry prints prints they have the screen pattern on them. It looks like the screen made indentations in the soft wet emulsion. I am of course carefull not to drag the wet print on the screens. I've also noticed that the with time the marks fade. I've always attributed it to the emulsion relaxing with time. I'm sure that I'm all wet with what the screen pattern is and why it fades with time. All I know for sure is that the screen pattern is there when the prints first dry and after a while the screen patterns fade. My biggest problem is when I get lint, dust, etc on the screens and I don't notice until the prints are dry and the junk from the screen is embedded in the emulsion of the print. I've ruined more prints then I care to think about that way. See given enough time you always find two people that will agree :-D -- LF Website @ http://members.verizon.net/~gregoryblank "To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public."--Theodore Roosevelt, May 7, 1918 |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Gregory Blank wrote:
: In article , : Frank Pittel wrote: : Gregory Blank wrote: : : In article , : : Tom Phillips wrote: : : : You're likely using a screen that is not chemically inert : : (as far as drying anyway.) : : : How do you figure that? : : : Drying screens should not leave : : impressions in the emulsion. : : : No they shouldn't but it may have been a different : : screen set than the current nylon? screen I use now : : and what I am doing works so I ain't gonna fix it by : : putting the prints face down :-) : : I dry my fiber prints face down on screens from Calumet (zone VI) : and when I remove the dry prints prints they have the screen pattern : on them. It looks like the screen made indentations in the soft wet : emulsion. I am of course carefull not to drag the wet print on the : screens. I've also noticed that the with time the marks fade. I've : always attributed it to the emulsion relaxing with time. : : I'm sure that I'm all wet with what the screen pattern is and why it : fades with time. All I know for sure is that the screen pattern is there : when the prints first dry and after a while the screen patterns fade. : : My biggest problem is when I get lint, dust, etc on the screens and I : don't notice until the prints are dry and the junk from the screen is : embedded in the emulsion of the print. I've ruined more prints then I : care to think about that way. : See given enough time you always find two people that will agree :-D :-) -- Keep working millions on welfare depend on you ------------------- |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 13:49:50 GMT, PGG
wrote: I simply hang the prints by clipping it at the corner with a binder clip. Leaves a little mark, but nothing that bothers me. Regardless, how will your customer feel if you send him a unmounted, curled fiber print? Even if you use drying screens, blotters, etc, the print will still curl without dry-mounting it. I'd wondered about that but assmed that shipping it in plastic sandwiched between stiff cardboard would not permit re-curling. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
"David Nebenzahl" wrote in message
... Well, of course; what I was getting at was the possibility that residual chemistry can be absorbed by a blotter and accumulate over time, so that eventually you have a *lot* of junk which can transfer back to prints, even if the prints have been reasonably well washed. Air dry them on vinyl screen. Press them flat between archival paper layers in a book press. I have to believe you can find a book press. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 13:49:50 GMT, PGG
Regardless, how will your customer feel if you send him a unmounted, curled fiber print? Even if you use drying screens, blotters, etc, the print will still curl without dry-mounting it. I don't know what kind of drying or paper you are using, but it is not truly a problem making flat, air-dried prints. Not at all. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Bought HP 4x6 Premium Plus photo paper that cost me 17 cents per sheet | Renee | Digital Photography | 0 | January 24th 05 03:04 PM |
Don't bother with Ilford paper & Canon i9950 | BenOne© | Digital Photography | 13 | December 1st 04 05:33 AM |
Light struck colour paper? | Ken Hart | In The Darkroom | 1 | September 20th 04 11:06 PM |
contact print exposure time | John Bartley | Large Format Photography Equipment | 16 | July 12th 04 10:47 PM |
Durst RCP20 color-B/W daylight paper processo for sale. | Ilija Kovacevic | 35mm Equipment for Sale | 0 | September 30th 03 07:15 PM |