There could still be hope! 4 a D7200!!!

Nikon Rumors is betting their ass... http://tinyurl.com/nf5rhjc
--
teleportation kills

In article , android wrote:

Nikon Rumors is betting their ass... http://tinyurl.com/nf5rhjc

Yeah, but will it really be a D500 replacement? :-D

(just kidding)

--
Sandman

In article ,
Sandman wrote:

Yeah, but will it really be a D500 replacement?

Considering that that you've posted in that other thread... Sure! Just
wait a decade or so. I think that dropped the "4" in favor of a "5" just
because... It's sign of the time!
--
teleportation kills

On Thu, 19 Feb 2015 11:08:43 +0100, android wrote:

In article ,
Sandman wrote:

Yeah, but will it really be a D500 replacement?

Considering that that you've posted in that other thread... Sure! Just
wait a decade or so. I think that dropped the "4" in favor of a "5" just
because... It's sign of the time!
--

Regards,

Eric Stevens

On Thu, 19 Feb 2015 06:01:46 +0100, android wrote:

Nikon Rumors is betting their ass... http://tinyurl.com/nf5rhjc

Too late. I just pulled the trigger on a D810/24-120 bundle.

In article ,
Bowser wrote:

On Thu, 19 Feb 2015 06:01:46 +0100, android wrote:

Nikon Rumors is betting their ass... http://tinyurl.com/nf5rhjc

Too late. I just pulled the trigger on a D810/24-120 bundle.

That'll tell all them losers that think that half frame is the future of
digital photography. ;-)
The EOS M is still my carry around solution though...
--
teleportation kills

On Tue, 24 Feb 2015 08:55:48 +0100, android wrote:

In article ,
Bowser wrote:

On Thu, 19 Feb 2015 06:01:46 +0100, android wrote:

Nikon Rumors is betting their ass... http://tinyurl.com/nf5rhjc

Too late. I just pulled the trigger on a D810/24-120 bundle.

That'll tell all them losers that think that half frame is the future of
digital photography. ;-)
The EOS M is still my carry around solution though...

Well, I'm keeping the GH3 and my m4/3 kit. Still does a great job and
can't be beat as a travel cam. Love those light 2.8 zooms.

But I have a few things coming up over the next two years that really
call for higher IQ.

Bowser Wrote in message:
On Tue, 24 Feb 2015 08:55:48 +0100, android wrote:

In article ,
Bowser wrote:

On Thu, 19 Feb 2015 06:01:46 +0100, android wrote:

Nikon Rumors is betting their ass... http://tinyurl.com/nf5rhjc

Too late. I just pulled the trigger on a D810/24-120 bundle.

That'll tell all them losers that think that half frame is the future of
digital photography. ;-)
The EOS M is still my carry around solution though...

Well, I'm keeping the GH3 and my m4/3 kit. Still does a great job and
can't be beat as a travel cam. Love those light 2.8 zooms.

But I have a few things coming up over the next two years that really
call for higher IQ.

The sensor in mft is really tiny. Quarterframe...
--
Bats can't tell us apart!


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/

On 25/02/2015 18:29, android wrote:
Bowser Wrote in message:
[]
Well, I'm keeping the GH3 and my m4/3 kit. Still does a great job and
can't be beat as a travel cam. Love those light 2.8 zooms.

But I have a few things coming up over the next two years that really
call for higher IQ.

The sensor in mft is really tiny. Quarterframe...

So what, /if/ that sensor can deliver the desired image quality? As
Bowser suggests, if you need more get a bigger sensor. For all my
needs, today's micro-four-thirds sensors and lenses are quite adequate,
and remarkable considering the size and weight benefits.

Example: I just bought the Olympus fish-eye lens - weighs 50g and is
about the size of a lens cap! Less than GBP 100 as well.

--
Cheers,
David
Web: http://www.satsignal.eu

David Taylor Wrote in message:
On 25/02/2015 18:29, android wrote:
Bowser Wrote in message:
[]
Well, I'm keeping the GH3 and my m4/3 kit. Still does a great job and
can't be beat as a travel cam. Love those light 2.8 zooms.

But I have a few things coming up over the next two years that really
call for higher IQ.

The sensor in mft is really tiny. Quarterframe...

So what, /if/ that sensor can deliver the desired image quality? As
Bowser suggests, if you need more get a bigger sensor. For all my
needs, today's micro-four-thirds sensors and lenses are quite adequate,
and remarkable considering the size and weight benefits.

Example: I just bought the Olympus fish-eye lens - weighs 50g and is
about the size of a lens cap! Less than GBP 100 as well.

A quarterframe sensor can only deliver half of the information of
a half frame one, like in the EOS M or a quarter of a fullframe
one, like in a D810. Any other statement is pure
BS.
--
Bats can't tell us apart!


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/