If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
question about chemical developers
hi.
i was reading the safety sheets of some development chemicals products for film and for papers. in every sheet that i've read, there's always a paragraph like this : "Irritating to eyes, respiratory system and skin. Limited evidence of a carcinogenic effect. May cause sensitisation by skin contact. Possible risk of irreversible effects. Carcinogen Category 3. Mutagen Category 3." do you know if it's possible to find safe development products, without the risk of carcinogenic effects ? i've heard that there are some ecological developers, without a substance called "hidroquinone". do you think these products without hidroquinone can be safe from this point of view (i mean, without the risk of carcinogenic effects ) ? please, let me know, thanks !!! |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"Beppe Albor?" wrote:
hi. i was reading the safety sheets of some development chemicals products for film and for papers. in every sheet that i've read, there's always a paragraph like this : "Irritating to eyes, respiratory system and skin. Limited evidence of a carcinogenic effect. May cause sensitisation by skin contact. Possible risk of irreversible effects. Carcinogen Category 3. Mutagen Category 3." do you know if it's possible to find safe development products, without the risk of carcinogenic effects ? i've heard that there are some ecological developers, without a substance called "hidroquinone". do you think these products without hidroquinone can be safe from this point of view (i mean, without the risk of carcinogenic effects ) ? First of all everything is dangerous. Don't drink the stuff. Don't take a bath in it. Some developers use Ascorbic Acid [Vitamin C] in place of Hydroquine. That should be safer. I'll bet your house is full of stuff more dangerous then your photochemicals. The important thing is safe handling. Nick |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"Beppe Alborč" wrote in message
... hi. i was reading the safety sheets of some development chemicals products for film and for papers. in every sheet that i've read, there's always a paragraph like this : "Irritating to eyes, respiratory system and skin. Limited evidence of a carcinogenic effect. May cause sensitisation by skin contact. Possible risk of irreversible effects. Carcinogen Category 3. Mutagen Category 3." do you know if it's possible to find safe development products, without the risk of carcinogenic effects ? i've heard that there are some ecological developers, without a substance called "hidroquinone". do you think these products without hidroquinone can be safe from this point of view (i mean, without the risk of carcinogenic effects ) ? please, let me know, thanks !!! Hydroquinone is considered a carcinogen now. It has been used, and still be used, widely. If you don't put constantly your hands in liquid developers, don't breathe the dust from powder developers and work in a ventilated area, I consider these risks close to nil ... Hydroquinone is not the only hazardous chemical in a darkroom but using simple prevention habits limits the risk to the minimum. By the way, I'm sure you have household products that are certainly more dangerous than the great majority of the common photographic chemicals. There are developers more environment friendly like the developers using Ascorbic Acid (Vitamin C) as main development agent. The most common is XTol, used for films and this a great developer, my favourite for nearly all films from low to medium-high sensitivity. For papers, Agfa Neutol Plus also uses Vitamin C. These not the only ones. There are also formulas on the web using Vitamin C if you want to mix them from scratch, just do a Google search. Un salutone, -- Claudio Bonavolta http://www.bonavolta.ch |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"Beppe Alborč" wrote in message
... hi. i was reading the safety sheets of some development chemicals products for film and for papers. in every sheet that i've read, there's always a paragraph like this : "Irritating to eyes, respiratory system and skin. Limited evidence of a carcinogenic effect. May cause sensitisation by skin contact. Possible risk of irreversible effects. Carcinogen Category 3. Mutagen Category 3." do you know if it's possible to find safe development products, without the risk of carcinogenic effects ? i've heard that there are some ecological developers, without a substance called "hidroquinone". do you think these products without hidroquinone can be safe from this point of view (i mean, without the risk of carcinogenic effects ) ? please, let me know, thanks !!! Hydroquinone is considered a carcinogen now. It has been used, and still be used, widely. If you don't put constantly your hands in liquid developers, don't breathe the dust from powder developers and work in a ventilated area, I consider these risks close to nil ... Hydroquinone is not the only hazardous chemical in a darkroom but using simple prevention habits limits the risk to the minimum. By the way, I'm sure you have household products that are certainly more dangerous than the great majority of the common photographic chemicals. There are developers more environment friendly like the developers using Ascorbic Acid (Vitamin C) as main development agent. The most common is XTol, used for films and this a great developer, my favourite for nearly all films from low to medium-high sensitivity. For papers, Agfa Neutol Plus also uses Vitamin C. These not the only ones. There are also formulas on the web using Vitamin C if you want to mix them from scratch, just do a Google search. Un salutone, -- Claudio Bonavolta http://www.bonavolta.ch |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
I am neither a chemist, an environmentalist or a doctor but here is my
personal take and opinion, backed up by 30 years in the darkroom. MSDS sheets are written by lawyers and are full of "CYA" (Cover Your A**). There are MSDS sheets for water and Oxygen both of which are essential for life but that can be hazardous when used incorrectly. And that new items get added to the mutagenic and carcinogenic lists all the time. Here is a link to a "worst case" MSDS for Dihydrogen Monoxide (aka water) http://www.hsegroup.com/hse/text/water.htm Having said that, keep in mind that if you limit your exposure to these substances you should be OK, Hydroquinone is used in some topical skin cremes but the MSDS warns about skin exposure! Metol used to be considered the "baddie", older literature had a lot to say about "metol poisoning" it's been found the problem was caused by impurities rather than Metol. I use tongs when processing prints but will reach into a tray when a print gets stuck, I just wash my hands after I do it. I don't smoke (talk about your carcinogens!) and advise against smoking in the darkroom, other than the smoke film on everything in the darkroom there's that whole hand to mouth thing. I won't eat in the darkroom either for the same reason--besides a break to get a snack in the middle of a session is smart anyway--gets you out into fresh air for a few minutes. So here are my rules: Don't eat, drink or smoke in the darkroom. If you smoke, you've already been exposed to more carcinogens that you will experience in a lifetime in the darkroom. Probably also true if you eat a lot of red meat or barbeque! Use tongs for prints. Frequently wash your hands! If you wear gloves, wash them frequently, too. Mix chemicals in another room, the dust is bad for you and your sensitized materials, too. Mix chemicals from liquid concentrates or if you mix from dry or bulk components wear a simple dust mask; a respirator and good ventilation is recommended for strong organic compounds like acetic acid. Use eye protection, gloves and a mask when mixing. Understand and use all chemical handling precautions, read the product labels, always add acids to water not the reverse, dilution of strong acids and bases require special techniques and extra care; Glacial Acetic acid, concentrated ammonia and sodium/potassium hydroxide are especially nasty and should not be attempted without understanding the extra precautions required. Be especially careful when compounding old formulas that use heavy metals or really toxic, nasty metallic salts. Mercury, selenium metal, mercuric chloride, sodium dichromate (or bichromate in old literature) come to mind but there's a lot of other nasty chemicals out there, too. There are a lot of really good chemists that are on this list (much better than me) if in doubt query the group. Wipe down your counters and clean your equipment immediately, whenever you use it, clean your counters after mixing chemicals, clean up all spills immediately, chemicals in solution are much easier to clear up than dried-on crud. Install good ventilation. Don't even think about using a mercury thermometer! Take frequent breaks away from the darkroom. Have GFCI outlets installed in your darkroom and adequate safelighting. Rubber floor mats are non-slip and good for your feet and back. Clean them frequently and the floor beneath your mats. If you MUST use safer products try Xtol film developer or others made with ascorbic acid/sodium ascorbate, D-23 uses only Metol no hydroquinone, use citric acid stop baths (or none), use alkaline fixers or fixers made from sodium thiosulfate rather than ammonium. Paper developers with phenidone rather than Metol (Ilford Bromophen or Multigrade Developer come to mind). -- darkroommike ---------- "Beppe Alborč" wrote in message ... hi. i was reading the safety sheets of some development chemicals products for film and for papers. in every sheet that i've read, there's always a paragraph like this : "Irritating to eyes, respiratory system and skin. Limited evidence of a carcinogenic effect. May cause sensitisation by skin contact. Possible risk of irreversible effects. Carcinogen Category 3. Mutagen Category 3." do you know if it's possible to find safe development products, without the risk of carcinogenic effects ? i've heard that there are some ecological developers, without a substance called "hidroquinone". do you think these products without hidroquinone can be safe from this point of view (i mean, without the risk of carcinogenic effects ) ? please, let me know, thanks !!! |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
"Mike King" wrote: I am neither a chemist, an environmentalist or a doctor but here is my personal take and opinion, backed up by 30 years in the darkroom. MSDS sheets are written by lawyers and are full of "CYA" (Cover Your A**). There are MSDS sheets for water and Oxygen both of which are essential for life but that can be hazardous when used incorrectly. And that new items get added to the mutagenic and carcinogenic lists all the time. Here is a link to a "worst case" MSDS for Dihydrogen Monoxide (aka water) http://www.hsegroup.com/hse/text/water.htm Snip other good stuff As well thought out and defined as that is, you should save it and repost it when ever the question or a similar one reappears :-) -- LF Website @ http://members.verizon.net/~gregoryblank "To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public."--Theodore Roosevelt, May 7, 1918 |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
"Mike King" wrote: I am neither a chemist, an environmentalist or a doctor but here is my personal take and opinion, backed up by 30 years in the darkroom. MSDS sheets are written by lawyers and are full of "CYA" (Cover Your A**). There are MSDS sheets for water and Oxygen both of which are essential for life but that can be hazardous when used incorrectly. And that new items get added to the mutagenic and carcinogenic lists all the time. Here is a link to a "worst case" MSDS for Dihydrogen Monoxide (aka water) http://www.hsegroup.com/hse/text/water.htm Snip other good stuff As well thought out and defined as that is, you should save it and repost it when ever the question or a similar one reappears :-) -- LF Website @ http://members.verizon.net/~gregoryblank "To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public."--Theodore Roosevelt, May 7, 1918 |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
I have never used ruber gloves and I put my hands in paper developer
all the time. No problem! |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
wrote in message ups.com... I have never used ruber gloves and I put my hands in paper developer all the time. No problem! Uhmm, That would be 'Rubber' gloves. Maybe one has something to do with the other;~)) |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
My fingurs don't reed two weel eithre!
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Basic film developer question. | Tom Gardner | In The Darkroom | 22 | August 1st 04 03:00 AM |
Chemical replenishment question | Jim Hutchison | In The Darkroom | 1 | June 30th 04 02:31 PM |
Comparison of developer components | Mike Schuler | In The Darkroom | 2 | May 30th 04 10:17 PM |
the effects of aging on developers | Robert J. Mathes | In The Darkroom | 7 | January 27th 04 12:01 AM |